Honestly, I commend him for that which is more than I can say for a lot of reviewers out there. It takes a certain amount of humility to admit you have subjective biases and come to the conclusion that something else is on par or surpasses something you own that you already spent significantly more on. He spends a good time talking about specs, features, and feel/ergonomics of the unit, and comparison to another unit, which is infinitely more useful than talking about how the highs and lows sound.
I recently saw a review on one of the hypex or purifi class D module amps from one of the more popular "audiophile" reviewers and they kept going on about how sterile, thin, or bright the sound was despite the amp outclassing their own system in every metric while costing much less. They simply can't admit they are delusional, don't like the recordings they are listening to, prefer the sound of additional noise and distortion, or something of the sort. Of course those are the same people trying to tell you about special cables and how they prefer the sound of R2R dacs.
So it's nice to see a reviewer that isn't like this.