• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Topping A50 III Headphone Amp Review

Rate this headphone amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 2 1.1%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 2 1.1%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 18 10.2%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 155 87.6%

  • Total voters
    177

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
48,822
Likes
286,074
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Topping A50III balanced headphone amplifier. It was sent to me by the company and costs US$199.
IMG_0005.jpg

The A50 III is solidly built and is about as thin as you want it to be. User interface is simple: short press of the power button cycles through three separate gain settings. Both 1/4 unblanaced and 4.4mm "balanced" (really differential) headphone jacks are provided. Volume control is purely analog. A very small external switching power supply is provided:

Topping A50 III Balanced Headphone Amplifier TRS Bal back panel review.jpg

Nice to see universal inclusion of trigger automation in Topping products. The toggle switch is easy to find by feel so not an issue for it being on the back as the single control.

Balanced is provided through 1/4 jacks. You can either get an adapter from XLR or do as I have: use a cable that is 1/4 at one end of XLR at the other. They are quite common and cheap.

Topping A50 III Measurements
I started with balanced input and output:
Topping A50 III Balanced Headphone Amplifier TRS Bal Measurement.png

While excellent with incredibly low distortion, results are still below the standard Topping has set. So I tested unbalanced input/output:
Topping A50 III Balanced Headphone Amplifier RCA 1-4 HP Out Measurement.png

Distortion is now stunningly low at -145 dB! Overall noise has gone down even though we now have a tiny bit of mains noise. The new SINAD places the A50 III shoulder to shoulder with other state of the art headphone amplifiers:
best headphone amplifier review measurement.png


Per company spec, you can achieve the above results with either balanced or unbalanced inputs. It is the balanced output which has slightly lower performance in exchange for a lot more power.

Noise performance with same unbalanced in and out is superb:
Topping A50 III Balanced Headphone Amplifier RCA 1-4 HP Out SNR Measurement.png


Indeed, at 50 mv output, it tops our charts:
Most best quiet headphone amp reviewed 2025.png


If you have a super sensitive IEM, this is the headphone amp for you!

Frequency response is exceptionally wide and flat:
Topping A50 III Balanced Headphone Amplifier RCA 1-4 HP Out Frequency Response Measurement.png


There is good bit of exceptionally clean power available using 1/4 unbalanced output:
Topping A50 III Balanced Headphone Amplifier RCA 1-4 HP Out Power 300 Measurement.png

Interestingly, the medium gain has better performance than low gain. Balanced output as mentioned, brings more power but at slightly penalty of objective performance:
Topping A50 III Balanced Headphone Amplifier TRS Bal Power 300 Measurement.png


Same story holds for 32 ohm load:
Topping A50 III Balanced Headphone Amplifier TRS UnBal Power 32 Measurement.png

Topping A50 III Balanced Headphone Amplifier TRS Bal Power 32 Measurement.png

Protection circuit kicked in when using balanced output, shutting the unit down. In this mode, the amp doesn't want to clip which made my power sweep test vs impedance difficult. So I ran it with unbalanced output:
Topping A50 III Balanced Headphone Amplifier RCA 1-4 HP Out Power vs Impedance vs Distortion M...png


Distortion increases above 1 volt which you can remedy by using balanced output.

Channel balance is excellent:
Topping A50 III Balanced Headphone Amplifier TRS Bal channel balance Measurement.png

Conclusions
Topping yet again meets the very high standard we expect from the company in A50 III: Budget prices with state of the art performance! There is a bit of trade off with balanced mode where you get more power but also a bit more noise. But if you need the power, the noise will not be material since the headphone is insensitive to it anyway.

It is my pleasure to recommend the Topping A50 III.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 
Last edited:
So much for "a high end HPA needs a linear PSU" :)
 
Well it measures great. What does it bring to the table vs other similar Topping products? Is it offering greater output for less price? I mean it measures as well as some of Toppings other past products.
 
I'm also a bit confused by their amp lineup.

The A50s apparently is the lowest one in the A-lineup; then there also is this A50 III.
The A30 Pro (which I have) is larger with more power despite having a lower model number.
The A90 has been the benchmark for the longest time now but the A70 Pro has way more power and a more modern design than the A90.

So higher model number means better except if its a "Pro" model, then the lower number model is better.
I don't even want to get started with their DACs, where the current lineup features 4 different D90 models
 
Top of the "roost" for 199$
 
So other than for looks/design this will get you 99,99% of perfomance. That's like offering a VW Golf for the price of a Hyundai i10 base model which will lap the Nurburgring 2 seconds slower than a Porsche 911 GT3 RS. :)
 
This is all quite lovely, but it makes me glad that I bought the Topping L30 five years ago.
 
So much for "a high end HPA needs a linear PSU" :)
It's actually pretty hard to get a linear PSU 100% clean and free of net residuals. A GOOD smps has all of it's disturbances well out of the audio range and is easier to filter.
No question what to use for high end when you are serious about it.
 
How does the inside look? In terms of heat sink / encapsulated parts ?

Can it be as recommended as Topping l30 ii and Topping L50 , @solderdude
 
I'm also a bit confused by their amp lineup.

The A50s apparently is the lowest one in the A-lineup; then there also is this A50 III.
The A30 Pro (which I have) is larger with more power despite having a lower model number.
The A90 has been the benchmark for the longest time now but the A70 Pro has way more power and a more modern design than the A90.

So higher model number means better except if its a "Pro" model, then the lower number model is better.
I don't even want to get started with their DACs, where the current lineup features 4 different D90 models
They have to be cannibalizing their own sales. The proliferation of so many essentially identical products can create consumer confusion and paralysis. At least Topping is not as bad as SMSL in this regard.
 
It's the same price as the new Fosi ZH3, but I think this Topping tops it in virtually all measured aspects? Amazing.
 
With this level of power, what headphones today would be difficult to drive for the A50 III, are there such a product?
 
Back
Top Bottom