fpitas
Master Contributor
Even sharing a supply, I have to question the practical disadvantages. A huge supply vs smaller supply is still cheaper than a separate amplifier enclosure etc.
Thanks MattMy local CJ importer went over them some time years ago (I think it ended up being a fuse), can't remember the cost. Otherwise it's just tube replacement. The input tubes went 22 years with only one tube having to be replaced - something like $40. Otherwise it was re-tube the power tubes, which have lasted quite a long time. Bought late 90's, re-tubed around 2008, then again around 2015, and then just for fun tried some different tubes last year, though the old ones still worked.
Being monos they take 8 power tubes, so that's a disadvantage for tube monoblocks, sometimes double the tube costs. I think it was around $700 each re-tube.
But tubes are currently more expensive now mostly due to the war. I stocked up before prices went nuts. (Though they seem to be coming back down for lots of tubes).
Purchased second hand Matt, can I ask what sort of costs you have needed to outlay on them since?
I ask because I have long looked at Quad tube amplifiers.
That link looks very useful.Sweet![]()
All things being equal, outside of cost and size, mono blocks only have performance and reliability advantages. While these advantages can be "engineered around" for the most part, especially with more modern Class D designs and switching supplies, for a Class AB amp with a linear supply a mono block makes things a lot easier. Routing , layout, cooling, and PS tweaking are all easier and all contribute to better performance with less engineering and more reliability.
I had a service agreement with CJ in the 90's and I never saw one piece of gear come in for repair. LOL. It was the, "Lonely Maytag repairman syndrome."My CJ monoblocks have mostly been rock solid for decades now.
I had a service agreement with CJ in the 90's and I never saw one piece of gear come in for repair. LOL. It was the, "Lonely Maytag repairman syndrome."
Also, designing the amplifier to have a high PSRR will also minimize effects of supply variation on the output signal.Even sharing a supply, I have to question the practical disadvantages. A huge supply vs smaller supply is still cheaper than a separate amplifier enclosure etc.
This is true. Of course, modern recordings seldom have isolated channels with no crosstalk. That just sounds kind of weird.Also, designing the amplifier to have a high PSRR will also minimize effects of supply variation on the output signal.