• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Time Domain measurements?

haraldo

Active Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
119
Likes
18
Location
West Norway
Interesting point and really wonder your meaning when you say: no one ever listen to .
Though Michel Jonasz is not my first taste, he is a well estimated singer in France ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Jonasz

This is an example of something I think is super-nice

On the other hand: how many out there are listening to "cannon-shots" and material that only serve the purpose of showing the dynamic range of the system
 
Last edited:

Harmonie

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 30, 2020
Messages
1,927
Likes
2,085
Location
France
Sorry, I must have misunderstood your earlier post.
We agree then.

Well maybe there are video game addicted players who just love hearing cannon shots ?
 
Last edited:

Kravi4ka

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
22
Likes
18
AnaMightysound use Joachim's speakers to demonstrate their world class work with some of the most expensive equipment on the planet. And they as well as him are there for the love of music,not for the bragging rights or for the quick monetary success.

Meanwhile the Surveyor is giving the Beo LX a serious competition ;) I need a Surveyor plus a bass module...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20200924_193803.jpg
    IMG_20200924_193803.jpg
    4.5 MB · Views: 276

Kravi4ka

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
22
Likes
18
Unfortunately that is not my system but a friend's... If you rememeber the Beo LX was in bright orange :)

I feel bad for turning this thread into a Joachim Gerhard Speakers love thread but I could not resist, I am beyond happy with the Surveyor. Silence follows,
 

haraldo

Active Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
119
Likes
18
Location
West Norway
I am going to "swear in church" as we say in Norwegian, but I think it is an unquestionable fact that the passive speakers discussed here are not phase / time coheremt, when you set a 2nd order or 4th order linkwitz riley filter you get a 180 or 360 degree phaseshift, I assume you can correct this in the digital domain but then again, are we not correcting for something in the wrong place?

Making a true time-coherent speaker is extremely tough on the drivers and I assume especially the tweeter will live an extremely hard life.

I do have a pair of John Dunlavy designed Duntech PCL-15, perfect time/phase response flat as Nebraska, they have simply no signature whatsoever...., they have some magic that may be unsurpassed by any speaker I heard, no matter price.....
(but there is a lot of downsides too, bass is missing and you can't play loud, they can drive a Krell KAV400-xi into severe breathing problems without playing very loud, 82dB sensitivity for 1w, they look like crap, but it's pure magic)

I am not saying what is right or wrong, but I am saying that there is something with the best speakers that have perfect time/phase response, "some magic stuff" I think I never experienced yet in speakers with 2nd, 3rd or 4th order crossovers... Maybe it's my imagination or maybe I am ready to be visited by the doctors wearing white jackets.... I still think there is something there :)
 
Last edited:

Joachim Gerhard

Active Member
Industry Insider
Joined
Apr 29, 2020
Messages
169
Likes
131
There Is a host of other factors like radiation pattern, distortion, compression, sensitivity, cabinet resonances, Maximum volume, bass Extension, just to Name a few, to make or break a good speaker. I am Sure i can find flaws in the Dunlavy. A lot of water has flown down the rhine since. A L/R2 or L/R4 can be easy corrected with DSP unleserlich you think digital does Not Sound as good as analog. Then you have other big trouble.
 

Joachim Gerhard

Active Member
Industry Insider
Joined
Apr 29, 2020
Messages
169
Likes
131
This is the Step Response of the highly praised Genelec. Nobody Seams to complain. And i think they are perfectly capable to erode this if they wanted.
 

Attachments

  • 92C8E854-0111-4526-BEAC-6D3063A1DE06.png
    92C8E854-0111-4526-BEAC-6D3063A1DE06.png
    514.5 KB · Views: 287

Joachim Gerhard

Active Member
Industry Insider
Joined
Apr 29, 2020
Messages
169
Likes
131
I do not know Dirac. I work with Accurate. That requires measurements and some choices of the target curve. It can be perfectly corrected though and L/R crossovers have the advantage of controlled radiation pattern. The main disadvantage is a hole in the power response around the crossover frequency. That can be ameliorated with a rather low crossover frequency like what I did in the Surveyor. If the phase response of the Surveyor is audible with typical low crest factor music is questionable and a 6dB acoustic 2 way crossover is simply not possible. Maybe an octave around the crossover frequency but not deeper.
 

tuga

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 5, 2020
Messages
3,984
Likes
4,285
Location
Oxford, England
This is the Step Response of the highly praised Genelec. Nobody Seams to complain. And i think they are perfectly capable to erode this if they wanted.

Perhaps we just need more and better research on audibility thresholds. Until then people will just quote you the existing "science" and carry on merrily...
 

haraldo

Active Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
119
Likes
18
Location
West Norway
There Is a host of other factors like radiation pattern, distortion, compression, sensitivity, cabinet resonances, Maximum volume, bass Extension, just to Name a few, to make or break a good speaker. I am Sure i can find flaws in the Dunlavy. A lot of water has flown down the rhine since. A L/R2 or L/R4 can be easy corrected with DSP unleserlich you think digital does Not Sound as good as analog. Then you have other big trouble.

@Joachim Gerhard This is NOT criticism :)
merely a reflection how insanely difficult speakers are, and there is no way to make the best speaker in everything ..... When you use dsp based phase/time correction, are you happy with the result?, or do you think the best passive speakers go best with as minimal digital correction as possible? The digital correction systems I listened to always seemed to have a downside by sucking life out of music (I don't have that deep knowledge though)
You said "the best speakers are passive for a reason"

Still, I'd like that perfect phase/time :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Joachim Gerhard

Active Member
Industry Insider
Joined
Apr 29, 2020
Messages
169
Likes
131
The Problem with Digital Dome Right is a sound that is in many ways boring. Low distortion sounds Sweet. „ The perfect speaker will to unnotised „ Peter Walker.
 

UliBru

Active Member
Technical Expert
Joined
Jul 10, 2019
Messages
124
Likes
338
The Problem with Digital Dome Right is a sound that is in many ways boring. Low distortion sounds Sweet. „ The perfect speaker will to unnotised „ Peter Walker.
A perfect speaker will transfer a recording perfectly 1:1. If the result is boring then this must be caused by the recording and not by the speaker. Because an ideal speaker does not change the content of the music.
 

KSTR

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
2,732
Likes
6,101
Location
Berlin, Germany
This is the Step Response of the highly praised Genelec. Nobody Seams to complain.
IME the phase error from a standard LR4 two-way at ~2kHz or higher tends to be audibly benign.

Your choice of a lower XO freq and an acoustical LR2 is certainly even more benign and IME making such an XO linear-phase with phase pre-distortion of the source with an FIR does not really pay off: a very minor change in the soundstage realism, not always neccessarily better, is all what I have perceived personally in listening tests.

The 100Hz...2kHz range is fare more important wrt phase errors, IMHO, as is the addition/XO for subwoofers. There, I would strongly assume most people would rate the linear-phase clone of a speaker (or speaker + sub) higher in controlled blind tests. For example, a linear phase speaker tends to make polarity inversion more reliably detectable and it is easier to give one of two polarities the preference.

And most people would find the linear-phase version have more "slam" and "impact "and be very "quick" and "transparent" (if the room allows, that is), I would guess...
 

haraldo

Active Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
119
Likes
18
Location
West Norway
A perfect speaker will transfer a recording perfectly 1:1. If the result is boring then this must be caused by the recording and not by the speaker. Because an ideal speaker does not change the content of the music.

There is no such thing as an ideal speaker, I don't think there is any speaker that can do that .... go to a concert hall and listen to Leif Ove Andsnes playing a Steinway Model D, it cannot be reproduced by a hi-fi system .... at least I never heard it, and I auditioned the very very very best that Oslo Hifi Center has to offer, many times ... (including Geir Tømmervik's own rig with custom Kef Muon) very good but not there ...
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom