• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Timbral Quality of DAC Output Signals

Status
Not open for further replies.
How do you define timbre in music? I think this is a relevant standpoint, when speaking of relative frequency response and micro-dynamics.
Timbre is the characteristic overtone/harmonics structure of an instrument. As the simplest search could tell you.


Blowing up the word into something audio reproduction technology allegedly has or does, and then without a proper, widely agreed on definition, only muddies language and serves no purpose.
 
Timbre is the characteristic overtone/harmonics structure of an instrument. As the simplest search could tell you.


Blowing up the word into something audio reproduction technology allegedly has or does, and then without a proper, widely agreed on definition, only muddies language and serves no purpose.
Timbre is also a psychophysical perception...
 
Timbre is also a psychophysical perception...
Explain what exactly you mean by "psychophysical" in this context.

18661.gif
 
I presume this would be corroborated in a comparative spectral density estimation?
Correct, but since we don’t have access to the original recording (and this is a huge hole in your logic), we can never compare directly. Instead, we use measurements like THD+N, SINAD, etc. to assess whether the DAC is transparent or not. Case closed.
 
This is a person who apparently thinks frequency response measurements are inadequate to demonstrate that a DAC can reliably render changes in pitch. If not a troll, beyond help. Let's all move on.
Not true... and you are reframing the context regarding Timbre with this blanket statement about 'pitch'
 
Last edited:
Correct, but since we don’t have access to the original recording (and this is a huge hole in your logic), we can never compare directly. Instead, we use measurements like THD+N, SINAD, etc. to assess whether the DAC is transparent or not. Case closed.
Okay... I am wondering if a segment of digitized music were used as the comparative source-signal rather than a frequency sweep, would more be revealed in the spectral density estimation...
 
He's a troll, but it's good to at least address what I often see as common misapprehensions made by non-technical non-trolls.

The analogy to acoustic instruments is one I often see lead people down the wrong path, because it seems tempting to assume a choice of capacitor in the signal path is somehow akin to a choice of tonewood or perhaps the material for a loudspeaker enclosure. Of course, it does not work that way (unless a piece of equipment is heroically misdesigned).
 
Last edited:
Okay... I am wondering if a segment of digitized music were used as the source comparative source-signal rather than a frequency sweep, would more be revealed in the spectral density estimation...
Well, per my earlier post — a transparent DAC doesn’t add or remove anything you can hear from the digital input to the analog outputs. So whether you use a frequency sweep or digitized music as the source, the result is the same: a transparent DAC shows no measurable difference. You’ve now closed your case too.
 
Okay... Who is trolling who?
Lots of insinuating presumptions, and misinterpretations and reframing of context...
If you folks are presuming that I am challenging you and your insights... You are wrong... the cognitive bias is overwhelming.:rolleyes:
 
a transparent DAC shows no measurable difference.
I agree in theory... How do we implicitly define a transparent DAC platform output signal, without investigating the spectral density of this energy? Is a simple sine-wave frequency sweep telling the whole story?
 
I agree in theory... How do we implicitly define a transparent DAC platform output signal, without investigating the spectral density of this energy? Is a simple sine-wave frequency sweep telling the whole story?
You are ignoring all the other measurements used - THD+N, SINAD, IMD etc. When all of these measurements show performance below the threshold of audibility, we have empirical proof of transparency. Spectral density is one measurement, but not the only proof of transparency. Don't rely on a single measurement as proof of transparency, particularly when you lack access to the original reference signal needed to make the measurement useful.
 
Okay... I am wondering if a segment of digitized music were used as the comparative source-signal rather than a frequency sweep, would more be revealed in the spectral density estimation...
This exists and has been used for this purpose frequently... https://deltaw.org/ go to town...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom