• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Timbral Quality of DAC Output Signals

Status
Not open for further replies.

Audicron

Active Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2026
Messages
137
Likes
11
Can output timbral quality be extrapolated from the DAC performance measurement metrics?
 
Been there, done that:

 
Been there, done that:

So there is no influence on the psychoacoustic interpretation of the music?
 
For most of us their analogue output stages are a part of the deal, but I love my Topping DX5MK2 as it is the best sounding DAC I have owned. I also have 3 of the E50's on other systems mostly used with headphones amps from Schiit. Once I got the DX5 it is hard to go to much else until I can buy a BenchMark.
 
In the late 90s, somewhat to my surprise, I was able in blind level-matched tests to reliably distinguish between some DACs and CDPs based mostly on the different timber of sound they produced.
 
The timbral quality of a sound is based on its measurements when it was recorded. If your DAC is transparent, you are hearing the exact representation of recorded timbral quality.
Is jitter not a consequential influence on the encoded signal, in the psychoacoustic interpretation?
 
Is codified timbre simply quantified in the code and jitter has no influence?
Jitter is a non-issue in any modern, non-broken DAC. And yes the "code" (I'm presuming you're referring to the digital stream here) completely quantifies the original signal and the DAC is able to reconstruct the original signal no issue. Instead of looking to audiophile nonsense or your "gut" or "intuition" to guide you, learn something about how this stuff works. To start with, I can always recommend this video:

 
Is jitter not a consequential influence on the encoded signal, in the psychoacoustic interpretation?
No, not unless the product is highly flawed.

But all this was discussed probably a dozen times in the topic I posted.
 
Let's call timbre the subjective impression of how something sounds, for the sake of this discussion.

Competent (i.e. transparent) DACs don't operate in a way that could affect timbre except in terms of the filter. Some of them will roll off the highs a tiny bit which could be said to affect timbre.

Jitter is almost always way too low to hear at all, let alone in a way that would register as timbre.

Noise is just noise, no relevance to timbre unless it were signal-dependent, which I have not seen before.

Distortion is sometimes high enough to affect timbre, but rarely, and never in a competent DAC.

So TL;DR no unless your DAC is trash, or you can hear the top end of the filter, and even then it's not operating on the character of the sound otherwise.
 
Jitter is a non-issue in any modern, non-broken DAC. And yes the "code" (I'm presuming you're referring to the digital stream here) completely quantifies the original signal and the DAC is able to reconstruct the original signal no issue. Instead of looking to audiophile nonsense or your "gut" or "intuition" to guide you, learn something about how this stuff works. To start with, I can always recommend this video:

Déjà vu?
 
Is jitter not a consequential influence on the encoded signal, in the psychoacoustic interpretation?
Not in well designed DACs, which is why I said transparent DAC. You would save yourself a lot of headaches by not ignoring measurements and using them to inform your subjective side. The objective view is not to replace subjective view but to inform and guide it.
 
I doubt he watched the video the first time, and probably won't this time either, but one can always hope. In any case, I'll take any opportunity to spread the Word of Monty. ;)
 
I doubt he watched the video the first time, and probably won't this time either, but one can always hope. In any case, I'll take any opportunity to spread the Word of Monty. ;)
As I remember, somewhere towards the end he admits to some distortion artifacts being displayed in the oscilloscope analysis...
 
Is noise-floor inconsequential to timbral output integrity?
What he was talking about are all things leading from the demo setup, nothing else. Thus irrelevant to the point he’s making.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CD2
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom