• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Tidal/Qobuz/Spotify Connect Lossless

yes of course there is. Lossless compression means the decompressed file is identical to the file that was compressed. In audio terms all this means all PCM samples are identical.
A definition and standard aren't necessarily the same thing. I agree (mostly)with you regarding your definition. I guess what I'm saying is I haven't seen a standard of how and where the lossless signal is treated. If I send a 16 bit/44.1kHz signal out but (requires) it gets further processed into something less am I still giving you a lossless file? I'd say yes. I'm transmitting lossless. I don't know but the "lossless" choice I select on the app isn't in any way validating the file as 16/44.1. I'm making an assumption it is. We all are. Who verifies their CD is 44.1? We trust.

Not how science works. I prefer evidence. But like Mick Jagger sang "You can't always get what you want".
 
That is literally what @staticV3's test shows. Such a test can be quite hard to do not because Spotify (or any streaming platform) intentionally manipulates the files they stream but because it's very hard to be sure they have the exact same master as the comparison file that was purchased.
Thanks. Good info.
 
Can you prove that? Calling something nonsense without proof kind of falls back on you to prove it is as the claim made. I'm just tossing the video out for thought.
There's absolutely no obligation on me to provide proof against rubbish claims on the internet. You, as the person questioning whether Lossless truly existed, could equally well have done more research before reposting that same junk video that has been posted and debunked here several times previously. The proof is earlier in this thread that you didn't bother to read.
 
Hi,

I did not find a topic specifically addressing the recent comparison in Connect mode (direct device) between Tidal/Qobuz/Spotify.

As a long-time subscriber, I was impatiently awaiting Lossless from Spotify.

With my new hi-fi set (PMC Prophecy7 + Atoll AM300evo + Bluesound Node Icon), I have been comparing Qobuz, Spotify and Tidal for a few days (all 3 in Connect mode).

I quickly abandoned Qobuz because the interface and the application (CarPlay) are really not up to par. I want quality but not at this ergonomic price.

Concretely, in terms of sound quality, I compared a good twenty lossless tracks between the 3 (including in HD for Tidal and Qobuz), I didn't find much difference...

Maybe a small better and cleaner background noise on Tidal and Qobuz vs Spotify, but other than that it's really very subtle. And especially not on all the songs.

Please note, I am ONLY talking about the Connect version of the 3 steamers. It is therefore the device (Bluesound Node Icon in my case) which reads the track directly without going through the phone or the PC (and therefore bit-perfect).

I deliberately do not talk about app interfaces, ethics, philosophies or the catalogs of platforms. Simply in Connect mode, it's difficult to find a real difference on the few songs.

Afterwards, perhaps my ears are blocked (almost 50 years old), or my outfit is perhaps not high-end enough...

Your opinion?

thanks
Have you tried Qobuz with the updated Carplay experience?
IMG_6276.jpeg

IMG_6277.jpeg
 
It has been sometime since I subscribed to Qobuz. I occasionally check out Tidal to play with Atmos selections but am currently subscribing to Apple Music. I did experiment with Spotify Connect using different devices when they started their Lossless streaming a while ago to mixed results.
 
There's absolutely no obligation on me to provide proof against rubbish claims on the internet.
Actually you do. Prove it's rubbish or hold your peace. But by not being willing or able to says alot. He even stated the test equipment. The "S" in ASR is Science not Subjective. I think he would understand that. You don't get to trash anothers view because you don't like the source or want to impress with knowledge you don't have. Enough of that. I'm not rolling in the mud over this trivial point.

Ignore.

And I think I may have muddied the waters somewhat. Spending time online with a(nother) Spotify tech clarified that Spotify Connect doesn't imply Lossless. Connect, as many of you probably know, is their technology of streaming to various capable devices from your phone, tablet etc "connecting" them. So the many devices saying they are Connect capable is probably correct. Apologies for that.

The tech still couldn't answer why their app stated a device is not lossless when in fact it plays lossless material from a fellow streaming service.
 
Last edited:
No, a device app supporting a “Connect” feature from a particular service does not mean the device app also supports “Lossless” from that service as I found out tinkering with many different devices.
 
Actually you do. Prove it's rubbish or hold your peace. But by not being willing or able to says alot. He even stated the test equipment. The "S" in ASR is Science not Subjective. I think he would understand that. You don't get to trash anothers view because you don't like the source or want to impress with knowledge you don't have. Enough of that. I'm not rolling in the mud over this trivial point.

Ignore.

And I think I may have muddied the waters somewhat. Spending time online with a(nother) Spotify tech clarified that Spotify Connect doesn't imply Lossless. Connect, as many of you probably know, is their technology of streaming to various capable devices from your phone, tablet etc "connecting" them. So the many devices saying they are Connect capable is probably correct. Apologies for that.

The tech still couldn't answer why their app stated a device is not lossless when in fact it plays lossless material from a fellow streaming service.
Must support people are clueless however:

- The Spotify App will report lossless when it is receiving a lossless stream, however it will still report lossless if the output that is is playing to causes lossy compression for example playing over Bluetooth or AirPlay 2.

- Each Spotify Connect device has to be separately configured for lossless, as not all of them support it, if it has been and the UI reports lossless then it is receiving a lossless stream again this says nothing about what it is then outputting the audio via.

Many platforms will further process data for example all Sonos platforms resample everything to 48k, anything that has EQ ability or room correction or even a digital volume control must process the data even if it preserves sample rate. Android resamples everything to 48k and shoves it through a mixer.

Spotify Lossless is lossless and can be output unmodified on platforms where the application can physically do that. It is in exactly the same boat as Qobuz, Tidal or any of the other services on platforms that cannot.
 
Hi,

I did not find a topic specifically addressing the recent comparison in Connect mode (direct device) between Tidal/Qobuz/Spotify.

As a long-time subscriber, I was impatiently awaiting Lossless from Spotify.

With my new hi-fi set (PMC Prophecy7 + Atoll AM300evo + Bluesound Node Icon), I have been comparing Qobuz, Spotify and Tidal for a few days (all 3 in Connect mode).

I quickly abandoned Qobuz because the interface and the application (CarPlay) are really not up to par. I want quality but not at this ergonomic price.

Concretely, in terms of sound quality, I compared a good twenty lossless tracks between the 3 (including in HD for Tidal and Qobuz), I didn't find much difference...

Maybe a small better and cleaner background noise on Tidal and Qobuz vs Spotify, but other than that it's really very subtle. And especially not on all the songs.

Please note, I am ONLY talking about the Connect version of the 3 steamers. It is therefore the device (Bluesound Node Icon in my case) which reads the track directly without going through the phone or the PC (and therefore bit-perfect).

I deliberately do not talk about app interfaces, ethics, philosophies or the catalogs of platforms. Simply in Connect mode, it's difficult to find a real difference on the few songs.

Afterwards, perhaps my ears are blocked (almost 50 years old), or my outfit is perhaps not high-end enough...

Your opinion?

thanks
I have used Spotify (lossless) for years through my Cyrus Hi-Fi with pre-amp, 2 monoblocks, and 2 intelligent power regulators and Q Acoustic Speakers. I have just found Qobuz.

I compare theses streaming apps to my Cyrus CD Transporter, which is ultimately superior than any streaming app.

Immediately, the difference was striking. The sound from Qobuz is robust, very detailed, excellent dynamics and has a 3D Holographic sound stage. In all ways, Qobuz completely out performs Spotify.

I find it hard to understand how people cannot hear this dramatic difference.

In comparison, Spotify is dull, dynamics are poor and there is no 3D Holographic sound stage, at all.

I've read some of people's "technical" answers saying that all three streamers sound similar. And you're technical answers are simply wrong.

These are the reasons why Qobuz is superior to Spotify (I've never heard Tidal):

FLAC is a lossless format, meaning when it is decompressed, the audio is bitwise-identical to the original source. MP3 is lossy, meaning it permanently discards audio data deemed "less audible" by psychoacoustic models.

FLAC uses Linear Predictive Coding to efficiently pack data, which involves creating a mathematical model of the audio signal. Because it is lossless, it preserves the exact, linear wave shape of the original recording.

MP3 compression (even at 320kbps) removes data, creating a less accurate representation of the original sound. This results in a loss of high-frequency detail (like cymbals) and adds artifacts (ringing/hissing), making the signal non-linear in comparison to the original.

FLAC preserves the full dynamic range, allowing sudden increases in sound (transients) to remain crisp, while lossy MP3s often compress these sounds, making them sound less detailed.

These are scientific facts but you don't need the facts when listening. The difference is staggering and Qobuz FLAC 24-bit/192khz produces almost high end CD quality sound.

If you can't hear the difference, you may have your hi-fi configured incorrectly.
That is literally what @staticV3's test shows. Such a test can be quite hard to do not because Spotify (or any streaming platform) intentionally manipulates the files they stream but because it's very hard to be sure they have the exact same master as the comparison file that was purchased.


Hi,

I did not find a topic specifically addressing the recent comparison in Connect mode (direct device) between Tidal/Qobuz/Spotify.

As a long-time subscriber, I was impatiently awaiting Lossless from Spotify.

With my new hi-fi set (PMC Prophecy7 + Atoll AM300evo + Bluesound Node Icon), I have been comparing Qobuz, Spotify and Tidal for a few days (all 3 in Connect mode).

I quickly abandoned Qobuz because the interface and the application (CarPlay) are really not up to par. I want quality but not at this ergonomic price.

Concretely, in terms of sound quality, I compared a good twenty lossless tracks between the 3 (including in HD for Tidal and Qobuz), I didn't find much difference...

Maybe a small better and cleaner background noise on Tidal and Qobuz vs Spotify, but other than that it's really very subtle. And especially not on all the songs.

Please note, I am ONLY talking about the Connect version of the 3 steamers. It is therefore the device (Bluesound Node Icon in my case) which reads the track directly without going through the phone or the PC (and therefore bit-perfect).

I deliberately do not talk about app interfaces, ethics, philosophies or the catalogs of platforms. Simply in Connect mode, it's difficult to find a real difference on the few songs.

Afterwards, perhaps my ears are blocked (almost 50 years old), or my outfit is perhaps not high-end enough...

Your opinion?

thanks
 
Immediately, the difference was striking. The sound from Qobuz is robust, very detailed, excellent dynamics and has a 3D Holographic sound stage. In all ways, Qobuz completely out performs Spotify.
Spotify Lossless is bit-exact, meaning it outputs an exact copy of the master that the artist exported from their DAW:

No compression, no loss of detail, no dulling of the sound.

If you heard a difference between it and Qobuz, then I can think of a few reasons why:

-You were comparing different masters of the same track
-You did not level-match the two sources and the louder one naturally sounded better
-You did not listen blind, and so expectation bias made you perceive Qobuz as the superior service
 
Spotify Lossless is bit-exact, meaning it outputs an exact copy of the master that the artist exported from their DAW:

No compression, no loss of detail, no dulling of the sound.

If you heard a difference between it and Qobuz, then I can think of a few reasons why:

-You were comparing different masters of the same track
-You did not level-match the two sources and the louder one naturally sounded better
-You did not listen blind, and so expectation bias made you perceive Qobuz as the superior service
Also the poster cannot have been using Spotify lossless for ‘years’ since it was only launched in September 2025 and they are terminally confused as Spotify lossless also uses FLAC. The lossy version of Spotify uses Ogg Vorbis at various bitrates not MP3.
 
Back
Top Bottom