Hipper
Addicted to Fun and Learning
Can someone please provide a link, or explain, how an individual listener can do a blind test of speaker cables in a normal domestic situation.
Can someone please provide a link, or explain, how an individual listener can do a blind test of speaker cables in a normal domestic situation.
Can someone please provide a link, or explain, how an individual listener can do a blind test of speaker cables in a normal domestic situation.
Can someone please provide a link, or explain, how an individual listener can do a blind test of speaker cables in a normal domestic situation.
Controls are a catch phrase? Perhaps you still go to a barber for surgery?No one can, it is a catch phrase.
Easiest way is to record the electrical signal at the speaker terminals, then ABX the files.
Controls are a catch phrase? Perhaps you still go to a barber for surgery?
Can someone please provide a link, or explain, how an individual listener can do a blind test of speaker cables in a normal domestic situation.
A valid test requires the listener to not know which cable is being used; the method you've described is subject to psychological bias. If you don't have access to an ABX switch, you could ask a sympathetic friend to "blindly" switch the cables while you listen. He must show no "tell", and the output must be level-matched. Each participant keeps a record and the results compared after a number of trials. It can then be calculated how effective the listener is at determining the correct cable in use vs. random guessing.The easiest way would be to have amplifier that allows you to select speakers, as A B A/B .. and then simply switch the outputs.
You can make up a switch-box with an ABX switch (preferably get someone else to wire it for you and make a note of where the wires go) where the X will be either A or B, then do some blind testing. Make a note of whether you think X is A or B and do it enough times for some sort of statistical validity. Get the box rewired so that X may be the same as before or different, do that a few times, then check the connections, and see whether you were right enough times.
The person doing the wiring should not be present whilst you do the tests so any knowledge they may have won't influence you, and of course if you believe that a short length of generic wire to the switch-box and the switch box itself affects what you hear, then the test won't be valid for you.
The problem I have with blind testing is not the tests themselves, but me and my expectation bias. As a non-believer, my expectation is that I won't hear a difference, so I don't. Is that because there isn't a difference, or that I can't/won't hear it?
S.
I asked because they appear to be a counterfeit Kimber Kable; even has the same model name.
Paul McGowan is hardly a layman and he hears, according to him, the differences quite well. Rather convincingly
Why certain components, although done to the same specs do sound different from each other in a given setup can not often be measured, as it seems, it is how it is.
Why did Amir show only one range, and far outside our hearing, where his measurement are observed, did I miss something? Maybe I should watch it again.
As an argument this presentation is quite well done, except to the very end; calling someone a layman who can only do crossovers somehow defeats it. Paul McGowan is hardly a layman and he hears, according to him, the differences quite well. Rather convincingly. Why certain components, although done to the same specs do sound different from each other in a given setup can not often be measured, as it seems, it is how it is. One finds one explanation to it, the other thinks he defeated it by putting up something else and the circle goes on. Both are good and quire interesting as shown, but which is more true that the other - remains open.
Why did Amir show only one range, and far outside our hearing, where his measurement are observed, did I miss something? Maybe I should watch it again.
Paul McGowan is hardly a layman and he hears, according to him, the differences quite well. Rather convincingly.
The actual proof would be in numbers, and those do not always tell the full story. Like why bigger and oftentimes oversized transformer make amplifiers sound better - can you prove it by numbers? Or why tube amplifiers sound different from the solid state ones, especially when it comes to imaging - can this be proven by numbers? I never seen it, although I must admit I never looked. No, it is not inside my head, or at least I do not think so. I would not be starting this thread if I had doubts.