• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

The Waxwing Thread

It depends whether your system has digital clipping indication, and whether you've got an attenuator inline between the phono amp and the cheap ADC. If you have both it's quick and easy to dial in with your hottest recording.
I guess audacity will let you know. Been doing needle drops for decades. Every solution up until the sugar cube and waxwing was just a convoluted mess in terms of setup and execution. These two devices make digitising vinyl a joy. It also tells you everything you need to know whilst just listening. I can see how the app is a little cumbersome. Let’s see how it evolves.
 
I will take function over form every time. The App is fine from an organizational sense. Like anything else, some folks won't like.
I find operation easy due to the explanations in ean setting. I do like the settings, ever buy a LP that sounds flat as if it's a bad mix. I find by using feature it takes me 30 seconds to use warmth, air and other EQ to make 95% of poor recordings sound damn good. The others are just to far gone, KTel style, not much you can do with a bad mix on a thin album as boosting can't boost what the LP does not contain, no bass, can't boost bass in a audible way. I love the thing, so many lps sound so much better.
 
Just bought a Waxwing and holy smokes what a game changer. Not only does it sound amazing on it’s default settings but once you start playing with its dsp capabilities the sky is the limit. Very happy.
 
Greetings all. I'm considering a Waxwing purely as a phono pre in my system (Planar 6 with ND5 -> Cambridge Audio Alva Duo -> Yamaha RX-A8A AVR) as a possible upgrade to the Duo. It really has me intrigued. I wouldn't be using the digital output in any way. I've been looking at reviews and have read through this thread, but it seems most of the discussion, here anyway, revolves around getting vinyl playback ADC'd, tweaked, and out of the Waxwing to another device.

What about simply using it as a phono stage? Opinions?
 
Last edited:
Greetings all. I'm considering a Waxwing purely as a phono pre in my system (Planar 6 with ND5 -> Cambridge Audio Alva Duo -> Yamaha RX-A8A AVR) as a possible upgrade to the Duo. It really has me intrigued. I wouldn't be using the digital output in any way. I've been looking at reviews and have read through this thread, but it seems most of the discussion, here anyway, revolves around getting vinyl playback ADC'd, tweaked, and out of the Waxwing to another device.

What about simply using it as a phono stage? Opinions?
If you can afford it, go for it. Parks Audio products are at the sweet spot between innovative and affordable. If you are a vinyl enthusiast with an open mind to digital it's almost a no-brainer to send a few bucks to this small but serious-about-hifi business and, in return, enjoy seeing how it works in your system.
 
Greetings all. I'm considering a Waxwing purely as a phono pre in my system (Planar 6 with ND5 -> Cambridge Audio Alva Duo -> Yamaha RX-A8A AVR) as a possible upgrade to the Duo. It really has me intrigued. I wouldn't be using the digital output in any way. I've been looking at reviews and have read through this thread, but it seems most of the discussion, here anyway, revolves around getting vinyl playback ADC'd, tweaked, and out of the Waxwing to another device.

What about simply using it as a phono stage? Opinions?
Analogue out is absolutely fine. It’s a great performer.
 
Greetings all. I'm considering a Waxwing purely as a phono pre in my system (Planar 6 with ND5 -> Cambridge Audio Alva Duo -> Yamaha RX-A8A AVR) as a possible upgrade to the Duo. It really has me intrigued. I wouldn't be using the digital output in any way. I've been looking at reviews and have read through this thread, but it seems most of the discussion, here anyway, revolves around getting vinyl playback ADC'd, tweaked, and out of the Waxwing to another device.

What about simply using it as a phono stage? Opinions?
Works fine - I used it that way to start with. Then I needed to move my turntable across the room and 10ft toslink is better than 10ft analogue - kills noise too.
 
Don’t let yourself try out the waxwing through a decent DAC…. You may enjoy it a bit too much…

Not much danger in that. My only stand-alone DAC is a RME ADI-2 FS (love it) that's a part of my headphone rig in another room. I doubt I'd dabble, but hey, you just never know. :)
 
Last edited:
Don’t let yourself try out the waxwing through a decent DAC…. You may enjoy it a bit too much…
The built in DAC is perfectly adequate. No external DAC is going to be audibly better - especially given the inherent limitations of the source (vinyl) which by far swamps any imperfections in half way decent DAC designs.


The main benefit of the optical connection is complete elimination of any common mode noise.
 
it seems most of the discussion, here anyway, revolves around getting vinyl playback ADC'd, tweaked, and out of the Waxwing to another device.

What about simply using it as a phono stage? Opinions?
Just to be clear (and apologies if you’re already aware), the signal will be digitized whether or not you apply any additional processing.

I’m actually using mine opposite of how you’re planning to use yours, using an analog phono pre-amp and then running the signal through the Waxwing for Magic and other functions. It’s a great little device.
 
I’m actually using mine opposite of how you’re planning to use yours,
Seems an odd approach to me though. The phone pre functionality (gain and RIIA) of the waxwing is excellent - what do you think you are getting by doing that externally?
 
…what do you think you are getting by doing that externally?
Absolutely nothing other than the (purely psychological) satisfaction of having my source selector switch on “Phono” when using the turntable (I’m using the amp’s internal phono pre and switching the Waxing in via the tape monitor). I know it doesn’t make sense, but I don’t like the idea of my source being set to “Line 1” or whatever when the Phono input is right there.

However there was also a time when I didn’t like the idea of digitizing my vinyl signal, and I got over that. I will get over this too, and one day will use the Waxwing as intended, but one step at a time.
 
Just to be clear (and apologies if you’re already aware), the signal will be digitized whether or not you apply any additional processing.
Yes, I'm aware that there's no completely analog signal path in the Waxwing, and the purist in me is screaming. :) Whatever you feed to the RCA inputs goes through the ADC, but that's the whole point of the device, really. I do appreciate you mentioning it though.
 
Last edited:
Absolutely nothing other than the (purely psychological) satisfaction of having my source selector switch on “Phono” when using the turntable (I’m using the amp’s internal phono pre and switching the Waxing in via the tape monitor).
IMHO, this is one of the best reasons I've seen on ASR for "why I do it this way".

Nothing says "all is right in the audio world" better than having your pre amp / integrated amp set to Phono when playing albums on the turntable.
 
Last edited:
Absolutely nothing other than the (purely psychological) satisfaction of having my source selector switch on “Phono” when using the turntable (I’m using the amp’s internal phono pre and switching the Waxing in via the tape monitor). I know it doesn’t make sense, but I don’t like the idea of my source being set to “Line 1” or whatever when the Phono input is right there.

However there was also a time when I didn’t like the idea of digitizing my vinyl signal, and I got over that. I will get over this too, and one day will use the Waxwing as intended, but one step at a time.
Fair :)
 
Back
Top Bottom