• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

The Truth Pre Amp Review

Koeitje

Major Contributor
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Messages
2,306
Likes
3,960
Lordy, this is quite a mess.
A quick Google turns up a few internals pics here: https://www.superbestaudiofriends.o...ve-volume-control-for-dacs-sources.860/page-9

Forum comes compete with a snide remark about Amir. :(

Post above has the other pic I found.

The preamp looks like a total amateur build. There is so much wrong with it I would be utterly ashamed to put my name anywhere near something like this product, and as to charging $1k for it, it is just ridiculous.

The switch on the back is a chassis ground lift. Really. And it the switch would never survive a realistic fault current. It might weld itself solid, it might vaporise before a break blew leaving you with a lethal live chassis. Some versions don't have he list switch. It seems they just don't bother to ground the chassis. The mains wiring inside is not to standard either.

The quality of the soldering is beyond poor. It is what I might expect of a 12 year old doing a circuit build for the first time with poor quality tools. The entire internal layout and construction is quite simply terrible and not of merchantable quality. There is clearly no understanding of ground loops and management of ground return, which will be a contributor to the mains pickup and poor noise figure. Not a cable tie in sight, which along with the terrible soldering will lead to poor reliability.

Now to the circuit. It is an op-amp buffer on the input and output coupled by a light dependant resistor lit by a LED controlled by the volume pot. That is it. There is no light shielding for the LDRs so the chassis had better be light tight to avoid interference from external light sources - especially modern LED lights flickering away. This is a funny idea that keeps raising its head from time to time. The volume control on the front doesn't touch the signal, but just runs the LED. But there are all manner of issues with the idea, poor noise being one of them, and unclear distortion effects in the resistor.

This is a product that needs calling out for what it is. No matter what else, its construction leaves it as an unsafe produce that should not be sold.
There needs to be a panther past the headless one. This is deserving of it.
We need a panther for products that are simply dangerous.
 

Francis Vaughan

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 6, 2018
Messages
933
Likes
4,697
Location
Adelaide Australia
This is not the unit measured here. It looks as if it has an input selector on the front panel
It seems each instance is custom made and configured. Single or dual power supply and combination of inputs and outputs and switching. The core remains the same
 

3125b

Major Contributor
Joined
May 18, 2020
Messages
1,357
Likes
2,216
Location
Germany
That would be shabby for a DIY project let alone something sold to the masses, especially at over 1000$ wich is just insane.
Do they not have to prove electrical compliance/safety in the US?
 

DSJR

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Messages
3,387
Likes
4,521
Location
Suffolk Coastal, UK

renevoorburg

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2019
Messages
32
Likes
62
It looks like the left rotary button is placed lower than the other ?!?
 

Francis Vaughan

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 6, 2018
Messages
933
Likes
4,697
Location
Adelaide Australia
A very vocal UK based maker who never ever pulled punches called the LDR's out for having cadmium internally
That is just idiotic. We cadmium plate steel all the time. That is what the yellow plating is. Anyone want to call out Revel for the Beryllium in their tweeters? Just as stupid.
 

bboris77

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2018
Messages
450
Likes
933
There’s a lovely subjective review here https://www.tnt-audio.com/ampli/the_truth_e.html that has topless shots. My favourite paragraph from the review:

My first few listening sessions were a bit disorienting. I was not quite able to put words to my impressions. It took me 2 or 3 days of heavy listening time really start to be able to answer the question “What am I hearing?” I have concluded, and I am still comfortable with this conclusion many months later, that the strangeness was due to the lack of noise and distortion. An impression of something missing. With The Truth Pre Amp not only must one ask “What am I hearing?” but equally as important “What am I not hearing?”.

This “review” turned my stomach upside down. It represents everything that is wrong in this industry. It is shocking to see how the author identifies all the shortcomings of this product and then makes apologies and excuses for all of them.
 

DSJR

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Messages
3,387
Likes
4,521
Location
Suffolk Coastal, UK
That is just idiotic. We cadmium plate steel all the time. That is what the yellow plating is. Anyone want to call out Revel for the Beryllium in their tweeters? Just as stupid.


What about eventual recycling? Not challenging, just asking.
 

sergeauckland

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
3,457
Likes
9,147
Location
Suffolk UK
That is just idiotic. We cadmium plate steel all the time. That is what the yellow plating is. Anyone want to call out Revel for the Beryllium in their tweeters? Just as stupid.
This side of the water, cad plating hasn't been allowed for many years, and CDS cells are doubtful. Richard Dunn was sure that they were illegal.
I understand CDS cells also have an unfortunate property that the resistance has a small dependency on the voltage across the cell, so that generates some harmonic distortion in itself. Not enough to be audible, but quite enough for the numbers to look bad on something that should be entirely passive except for a buffer.

S.
 

Sir Sanders Zingmore

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
May 20, 2018
Messages
971
Likes
2,005
Location
Melbourne, Australia

Nango

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
1,472
Likes
986
Location
D:\EU\GER\Rheinhessen
There’s a lovely subjective review here https://www.tnt-audio.com/ampli/the_truth_e.html that has topless shots. My favourite paragraph from the review:

My first few listening sessions were a bit disorienting. I was not quite able to put words to my impressions. It took me 2 or 3 days of heavy listening time really start to be able to answer the question “What am I hearing?” I have concluded, and I am still comfortable with this conclusion many months later, that the strangeness was due to the lack of noise and distortion. An impression of something missing. With The Truth Pre Amp not only must one ask “What am I hearing?” but equally as important “What am I not hearing?”.
These comments disqualify this site TNT for me there is no reason to read there any longer. Thanks for posting!!
 
Last edited:

AudioSceptic

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 31, 2019
Messages
2,726
Likes
2,607
Location
Northampton, UK
Lordy, this is quite a mess.
A quick Google turns up a few internals pics here: https://www.superbestaudiofriends.o...ve-volume-control-for-dacs-sources.860/page-9

Forum comes compete with a snide remark about Amir. :(

Post above has the other pic I found.

The preamp looks like a total amateur build. There is so much wrong with it I would be utterly ashamed to put my name anywhere near something like this product, and as to charging $1k for it, it is just ridiculous.

The switch on the back is a chassis ground lift. Really. And the switch would never survive a realistic fault current. It might weld itself solid, it might vaporise before a breaker blew leaving you with a lethal live chassis. Some versions don't have the lift switch. It seems then they just don't bother to ground the chassis. The mains wiring inside is not to standard either.

The quality of the soldering is beyond poor. It is what I might expect of a 12 year old doing a circuit build for the first time with poor quality tools. The entire internal layout and construction is quite simply terrible and not of merchantable quality. There is clearly no understanding of ground loops and management of ground return, which will be a contributor to the mains pickup and poor noise figure. Not a cable tie in sight, which along with the terrible soldering will lead to poor reliability.

Now to the circuit. It is an op-amp buffer on the input and output coupled by a light dependant resistor lit by a LED controlled by the volume pot. That is it. There is no light shielding for the LDRs so the chassis had better be light tight to avoid interference from external light sources - especially modern LED lights flickering away. This is a funny idea that keeps raising its head from time to time. The volume control on the front doesn't touch the signal, but just runs the LED. But there are all manner of issues with the idea, poor noise being one of them, and unclear distortion effects in the resistor.

This is a product that needs calling out for what it is. No matter what else, its construction leaves it as an unsafe product that should not be sold.
There needs to be a panther past the headless one. This is deserving of it.
Is there anything worse than this for $1k? It does f*** all and does it badly, the build and finish are below DIY standard, and it's not even safe.
 

DHT 845

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Feb 28, 2021
Messages
509
Likes
442
Top Bottom