It must have I2S input to properly clean all bits.
Fine service if you want some social media corporation algorithm to determine what is available to you and in substandard sonic quality.If you are someone that listens to the same 100 classic rock albums since you were 16 years old and you are over 45 now, streaming will not be for you.
If you can spare a measly 10 bucks a month and want instant access to a huge library of all types of stuff, numbering in the tens of thousands, than streaming might just be for you!
That is not how Spotify works. You simply search by artist and it brings up ALL their albums and you can play the entire album, or pick and choose songs, just like playing a CD.Fine service if you want some social media corporation algorithm to determine what is available to you and in substandard sonic quality.
Hope services don’t go way of Napster or recently Twitter.
You'll Own Nothing and You'll Be Happy. The prophecy was truebut I don't see "not having anything" as being a problem, since I'm happy to carry on paying for the streaming services.
I too have several hundred vinyl albums collected over decades and almost as many CDs. I was to start streaming with Qobuz, but they screwed up my billing so much that I moved to Amazon -- several years ago. At least, Amazon gets the billing right....But if one might say "I'd rather not be limited to a few hundred albums I own - I want access to hundreds of thousands of albums via streaming"...at what point is this overkill?
It seems to me the basic pluses for owning some manageable sized collection of music is that, while not as varied as streaming, it's possible to
have a more intimate familiarity with the artists you enjoy.
...Just musing...
This!It seems to me the basic pluses for owning some manageable sized collection of music is that, while not as varied as streaming, it's possible to
have a more intimate familiarity with the artists you enjoy.
Back up your playlists using Roon.Streaming is like rent: if you pay for a limited amount of time (or for a specific purpose) then it's great, do you job and that's it! But if you pay for years and years, it's better to buy your favorite tracks and go with a free/ad sponsored account. Time is of the essence - you may end up in that situation when after many years of paying for streaming, the moment you stop, you don't have anything...
This!
I now only buy vinyl and CD albums that I want this intimacy with. Especially vinyl haven me sit down, pause and actually listen to the music. Streaming from Qobus/Spottify and local CD rip have a tendency to be 'always on', often in the background.
In the past the collection had items added from curiosity of new artist or albums. Streaming help me to be more selective and often give great sugestion to artists I would not else be able to learn about.
Buying music on a physical media not only feed the hoarders like me. But it also put actual money in the artist pocket compared to streaming an album 100 times.
I agree. People talk a lot about the rituals of vinyl (selecting the album, carefully removing it from its cover, etc.) as an explanation for the revival of the medium. I've snarked about this too, but CD is also a ritual, and I think that's something of what you're getting at. It takes an effort and makes you concentrate. And that, I think, increases your satisfaction with the experience.I'm also less inclined to have music just streaming in the background these days. The first thing is that if I actu ally like what's playing I find it distracting to whatever else I'm doing. I just want to concentrate on the music. The other is that I find some music fatigue sets in. If I've been streaming music in the background for hours I don't have that "I want to listen specifically to music" urge and I'm less inclined to sit down in front of my system and enjoy music.
I generally save music for when I can give it my attention.
You'll Own Nothing and You'll Be Happy. The prophecy was true
Just joking of course
I agree. People talk a lot about the rituals of vinyl (selecting the album, carefully removing it from its cover, etc.) as an explanation for the revival of the medium. I've snarked about this too, but CD is also a ritual, and I think that's something of what you're getting at. It takes an effort and makes you concentrate. And that, I think, increases your satisfaction with the experience.
If I listen to internet music, or a good radio station, my concentration will eventually wander off elsewhere. If I take the time to look, consider, and read the CD case, I'm investing in the experience. And when I listen, that's all I'm doing.
Anyway, my two cents.
I agree , why buy 12 songs you may not even like when you can own(use) 90 million. And I am 68 years old, there is also all the time wasted it take the CD player to change tracks Or CDs. If I want background music I can play the radio. I get all the new albums every week and can explore new similar music and discover even more good stuff. This is not to take away the joy folks get from having a collection of records or teaspoons, collecting is its own fun. After all we are hunter gatherers.Same here...
I don't remember, how much I was spending on CD.. I got to close to 3000 CD.. I ripped these to a NAS; this was my most favorite source of music. This NAS was backed-up by another in my office and, yet another NAS one at home and .. Streaming came...
Then I realized that I could not reliably tell the difference between music in 250 Kb/s mp3, even less VBR 250 AAC or ogg-vorbis and started listening through Spotify.. Game changer , more music, more convenience then, I discovered Tidal in lossless , then Apple Music and my collection is gathering digital dusk. It is on a 2 HDD...
Paying about $20/month is IMO, worth it fore the virtually infinite libraries of music at my disposal via Apple and Spotify. I sometimes, am concerned about the streaming companies raising their prices... I find myself inching closer to $75.oo/month for movies subscription with Netflix, Disney, Amazon,etc.
Still, music streaming has been a game-changer and a source of enjoyment for me.
Peace.
I agree , why buy 12 songs you may not even like when you can own(use) 90 million. And I am 68 years old, there is also all the time wasted it take the CD player to change tracks Or CDs. If I want background music I can play the radio. I get all the new albums every week and can explore new similar music and discover even more good stuff. This is not to take away the joy folks get from having a collection of records or teaspoons, collecting is its own fun. After all we are hunter gatherers.
happy holidays and I hope there are many CDs or records under your trees. As I stream in front of my virtual fireplace.
And I'm sure many reviewers will actually hear a difference. It's the power of "audio-placebo" (is there a better term for this?).Unfortunately, network terminology has opened up another avenue for makers of bogus products to dazzle suggestible punters with. They can now spout their drivel, peppering it with acronyms and technical terminology to sound as plausible as ever to the uneducated.
The CD is the license to own the ripped music. Ripping and then selling is a crime. Why I have a music server and a closet shelf full of CD’sI used to buy and keep CDs, up to a point of having around 2000 CDs on my shelves. Every time when I moved house, the burden of finding storage space for those CDs was not enjoyable. I just hoped one day I could get rid of those physical CDs and could still enjoy high quality music whenever I wanted. Ten years ago, I made up my mind and ripped all my CDs into Applelossless files, and then sold 97% of my CDs (I now only keep some 40 CDs.) I must say it was a very liberating experience!
And now, I am further liberated by the online streaming and Airplay. I stream BBC3 every morning or play the local files in my iPad Pro via Airplay. For me, the physical medium of music is no longer attractive. Cheers