Reproducing the sound of a piano indistinguishable from the real thing is a hard ask, so I wouldn't be expecting it.
Some people have taken up the challenge. In France, Georges Cabasse and his closer associates, sound engineers Bernard Neveu and latter on Philippe Muller, have repeatedly made direct comparisons between reproduction and live sound over decades, especially with piano. Several bars of the score were replayed by the artist followed by several bars of reproduction of the prerecorded performance in the same venue, and so on and so on. In order to improve the consistency of performance of the real instrument, Cabasse also used a mechanical piano for this kind of exercise.
Here is a rare picture of the recording phase of one of this experiment (1978):
As can be seen, the recording technique that Cabasse and friends used to use was invariably a largely spaced pair of microphones, always omnidirectional microphones of the best possible quality. But they have also done multichannel recordings based on the same principle (1 microphone=1channel, no mixing or any signal processing of any sort).
This type of stereo recording was described in a piano disc album sponsored by Cabasse (BNL 112734) of the Israeli classical pianist Natan Brand playing Schumann's Kreisleriana and Chopin's 2nd sonata on a Bösendorfer Imperial:
It is my understanding that the famous John M. Eargle (RIP) used to use a very similar technique for some of his solo piano recordings, as one of his colleagues, M. Lutthans, has told us:
- https://forums.stevehoffman.tv/thre...l-cds-recorded-digitally.178138/#post-4292468
- https://forums.stevehoffman.tv/thre...tereo-recordings.1133116/page-3#post-28946163
As the recording method is both consistent and very well documented, albums from disc labels BNL and Syrius (B. Neveu) and Passavant Music (Ph. Muller) and possibly most piano albums recorded for Delos by J. M. Eargle can be good starting points for a discussion about the merits of this type of recordings.
Last edited:

