Recently went with a relative to a guys house with some OLA (original large advent) for purchase, and turns out he had literally 5 models of Advent in his basement man cave, including THIS exact model!
(my cousin DID leave with the OLA speakers)
I sheepishly asked if we could maybe hear the other models to compare them, as I was into audio and speakers. He seemed excited, and started to talk about a test of the "New Advent" online, and I realized he was talking about ASR!!
He is NOT a member but read the test and allowed me and my cousin to hear the model Amir reviewed.
My assessment as I had not heard any of these in probably about 30 years, was yes, it was not really as good as I had remembered for sure, but...........
At the same time, I was still fairly impressed with the deep bass, and a relatively neutral sound. I did not frankly hear weak bass or boosted highs, OR even what I would call a lot of distortion. Guy said they were refoamed a few years ago.
So I am left truly pondering, what caused this huge variance in listening versus Amir's test or his test sample??
I have mostly agreed with speakers I have heard or owned that Amir tested, except for this ONE vintage model.
Looking back at measurements, have to wonder why it "sounded" more like the room reflections curve to me than the on axis?? I am NOT saying it sounded perfect, but just a much closer to neutral sound overall.
We did check the switch, and he actually had it on HIGH, and still the treble was relatively neutral.
On-axis response is relevant mainly in how it contributes to the total output. In a domestic room, we don't hear the on-axis response on its own, because we're always sitting in the reverberant field. Reflected sound is dominant. Smoothness of off-axis radiation is as important and smoothness of on-axis radiation. Anyway, the various Advent models were excellent speakers for their time.