• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

The most overrated and underrated audio products you tried/owned?

Apologies if off topic, but I am curious.
If the quality got worse. Any idea why?

Warning: this post is off-topic.

Let's say there are three companies.

Company "A" produces a quality product. This product costs more than an inferior product. Company "A" also wants to innovate. Innovation takes Research and Development, and that costs money. Company "A" also has a better-than-average guarantee, and provide tech aid to dealers and repair entities.

Company "B" produce a product that can be described as "average". It costs less to produce than the product company "A" offers, so they can sell it at a lower price. They advertise by price, and not innovation, thereby avoiding the financial burden of R&D. Their guarantee is modest, and their tech aid is only to servicing dealers ... no one else.

Company "C" produces a product that is very cheap to produce and has a high failure rate. They offer a guarantee, but create roadblocks to easy implementation for the customer. However, they offer an exemplary trade-in policy, and dealers use that to quell customer dissent. Techs are low-paid, instructed to replace rather than repair. Although the company has a poor reputation, new models are introduced yearly, with sales spiels that this year's model is "new and improved", and the problems that a customer had experienced are now gone.

Company "A" makes the lowest net profit, because they feel the pressure on prices from company "B", and eventually they are bought out by company "B". The high-quality brand name of company "A" is put on the products of company "B", and used to sell the lower-cost product at a slightly higher price than the native products of company "B".

However, the exceedingly high net profits accumulated by company "C" allow company "C" to eventually buy out company "B". Companies "A", "B" and "C" are now under one all-inclusive corporate umbrella, dominating the market. The new giant operates according to the manner that company "C" has always operated. Customers are irate. That comes to nothing, because the new conglomerate is so big that it doesn't need to cater to the worries about quality or service, as long as it is careful to stay barely inside the letter of the law.. It tells everyone, "It's a new world out there. The old ways of doing business are gone. "

You ask, "Why do things work this way? I hear people say that they'll pay more for good quality and good service."
Yes, you do hear that, but people are two-faced liars. They'll rationalize any way they can to chase a lower price, living in denial that by doing so, they are cutting their own throat.

Aren't people wonderful? :D:D:D
 
Last edited:
Yes/no/maybe.

Aye, no good can come from profit margins trumping quality.

However they should not need to be mutually exclusive.
In fact I would suggest they should be an obvious combo. My 2c.
 
Overrated: Grado headphones. Both physically and sonically painful.

I only tried one Grado pair un my life, the GS2000e. I was extremely surprised by the sound–it was so bright, it was downright painful at times.

The dude trying to sell it to me didn't know anything about it and I caught him BSing. He wanted me to believe the brightness came from his DAC. He was like "Grado, what is it, Italian?" so I'm like "hmm, no, they're based in Brooklyn" and then he went "well, yeah I think it's my dac that made it sound bright... Americans are not known for their bright sound". There was so much BS in that statement, I didn't even want to discuss.

But I have to say: it was the most comfortable headphone I've ever experienced. Like I wasn't wearing anything.
 
I only tried one Grado pair un my life, the GS2000e. I was extremely surprised by the sound–it was so bright, it was downright painful at times.

The dude trying to sell it to me didn't know anything about it and I caught him BSing. He wanted me to believe the brightness came from his DAC. He was like "Grado, what is it, Italian?" so I'm like "hmm, no, they're based in Brooklyn" and then he went "well, yeah I think it's my dac that made it sound bright... Americans are not known for their bright sound". There was so much BS in that statement, I didn't even want to discuss.

But I have to say: it was the most comfortable headphone I've ever experienced. Like I wasn't wearing anything.
I've owned the 60s, heard the 80s. My judgement comes from those two models.
 
Overrated
* vinyl
* reel-2-reel
* hires >100ksps
* tubes

Underrated
* MP3 320kbps
* Studio Monitors
* Room EQ
 
Overrated
Sennheiser HD800S
AKG K812
Dan Clark Ether 2
Audeze LCD-X
Neumann KH120
Genelec 8030
Sennheiser HD 25 II
Sennheiser HD 650

Underrated
APS Klasik 2020
Beyerdynamic DT 770
Beyerdynamic DT 990
Focal Utopia
 
Overrated: Beats by Dre Studio 3. While stylish and bass-heavy, the sound quality felt unbalanced, with muddy mids and overemphasized lows, especially given the premium price. You're essentially paying more for branding and aesthetics than audio fidelity.

Underrated: Sony MDR-7506. These studio headphones offer exceptional clarity, balance, and durability at an affordable price. They might not have flashy marketing, but their neutral sound profile is perfect for both casual listening and professional audio work, making them an unbeatable value.
 
Citing brands can lead to serious problems.
I would say that everything I bought, usually second-hand from careful individuals or stores, expensive and for me therefore anything over a few hundred $ disappointed me.
I don't see or rather don't hear any contribution, for electronics in general the sound is about the same, for transducers slightly different but never better.
So everything that is tube, in analog tape recorders, turntables/arms/cartridges at no price (some exceeding $15,000! - I have even seen very ordinary headshells at more than $500! $500!-), speakers at more than $500 with zero finish where we don't even know the brand of the parts used (obviously it's crappy OEM).
Which leads to useless accessories: cables, boxes of all kinds, power strips, mains filters.
And test records at over $50-60 !
The price of records is also a cause for concern for me.
 
Overrated: Deploying more loudspeakers than a 5.2 configuration for multi-channel audio playback

Underrated: the functionality of the $149 WiiM 'Pro' streamer
 
Overrated: Deploying more loudspeakers than a 5.2 configuration for multi-channel audio playback

I would pick 5.1.2 over 5.2.0. This is both for Atmos upmixing options and Atmos native content.
 
over rated:

bose.
home stereo crap at box stores.
surround sound.
atmos.
any celeb owned of endorsed audio product like beats etc..
klipsch.
tannoy.
some fyne audio claims.
some focal products.
pathos.
crazy weird expensive tt and carts.
vinyl.
any weird shit being pushed or advertised heavily on "what best forum"
almost any paper or coated paper material cone speakers that end up folding forward.

under rated:

boutique brands.
computer streaming.
tube rolling.
using a buck box on your room.
foam treatment in rooms.
foam roll outs behind speakers.
rolling your own cigars and aging them.
 
Last edited:
Good question.
Wiim Ultra is on my OVERRATED list because:
1. you can do the same thing with Wiim mini or RPI4 with Moode for 1/3 the price.
2. The RCA jacks on Wiim Ultra are weak, poor design.
3. The USB port is poor implementation.
4. No one needs a tiny screen for $200+ more.
Agree on 4.
1. doesn’t make sense! No sub output, no hdmi arc,
2. RCA works perfectly on my WiiM, hold well, maybe some models have loose connections…
3-Why is USB port implementation poor?
 
Back
Top Bottom