Recently, I caught a video by chance on YT, the subject of which was (of all things) the uses of hydrogen peroxide for clearing drains and removing bathtub mineral deposit stains. The cost: less than $2.50 (USD) per 32 oz bottle. No retailer or plumber wants the public to know this.
I think some of that is the same for home hi-fi audio. Most enterprises are not interested in making things less expensive--in fact they try to drive the price up. We see this with boutique audio companies charging many multiples of their cost (including labor) to their customers. They want to make a living off of it (and not work too hard along the way)--not so much drive the prices down to 20%-40% over their costs in order to increase volume sales.
It's the consumers themselves that will have to take the lead on driving prices down and avoiding the boutique business models. I expect this trend to continue into the future. Nonprofit enterprises like Consumers Union (Consumer Reports) have traditionally screwed up their end of the deal--especially with loudspeakers. It took a visit from JBL/Harman (Sean Olive, et al.) to convince them that their loudspeaker ratings systems were in fact "completely upside down". After that, CU decided to get out of the home hi-fi ratings business.
So who do we have nowadays that can fill in? Well, the couple of guys that own Klippel NFS systems will help, as well as the testing gear for electronics (like the guy that owns this site). So what's the problem here? Sometimes these guys think they have all the answers--when they don't. Expertise is something that comes from working for a competent engineering company for many years on those products of interest. Even then, there are "quality escapes" I've found--those guys that think they learned all there is to know--but in fact don't.
So what's going to happen? I think that the word will eventually get out that the electronics (except for DSP transfer function correction) constitute maybe 5-10% of the fidelity puzzle. The rest of that 90-95% being a) room acoustics, b) loudspeakers, and c) recordings. Even poorly performing electronics identified by the talking heads typically sound "not to bad" for the majority of consumers. It's the room acoustics and loudspeakers (and recordings) that really determine what you hear.
But in the future, it will probably be the AIs that inform the consumers. They have a long way to go, unfortunately. The last time I did some test queries of Google, the results were an arithmetic mean of the audiophile community opinions. I think that Floyd Toole's book is the only thing that seems to be counterbalancing that sort of advice currently.
Chris