• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

The Case Against OLED

Then again I avoid restaurants and people gatherings. Having multiple discussions running simultaneously and 5-6 humans blare against each other & copious amount of background noise is super taxing.
Then why bother being there with people that you don't want to associate with?
I don't.
 
Restaurants I can kinda understand, sometimes the discussions simply revolve around topics you're not interested in, so I'd zone out too.
You wouldn't consider that rude?
Same as inviting friends over for a social evening and then pasting your attention on a TV.
And I'm not talking about having them over for a game or movie nite together.

Then why bother being there with people that you don't want to associate with?
I don't.
Exactly
 
Because most of the stuff I do on my PC involves static content. Long hours of Desktop use, many, many hours in Blender (Viewport is dynamic but the surrounding UI is not). OLED simply can't handle that for long and I am not in the mood to replace the screen due to uneven wear after a year or so.

This is mainly about tvs, but you might want to take a look at this long term torture test, OLED tech have drastically improved compared to what it once was.

 
This is mainly about tvs, but you might want to take a look at this long term torture test, OLED tech have drastically improved compared to what it once was.
Improved yea, but I sure wouldn't want my expensive Sony TV to look like this after only a couple years use.
For my type use I'll still pass on OLED's.
50-gray-06-large.jpg
 
I have a LG B7 from 2017 with quite many hours of Blender and other static Windows things, and also lots of movies and Youtube but still no visible burnin (except some on test colours like pure pink or whatever) :)
So you have visible burn-in. As soon as you work with monochromatic content, e.g.: editing a texture in greyscale, you would notice it.
Then why bother being there with people that you don't want to associate with?
I don't.
Ever heard of family obligations? While I usually shy away from attending social gatherings, on some occasions that is simply not an option.
You wouldn't consider that rude?
No, why would I? The people are busy with themselves and hardly even notice that I am there. As a person I am not very interesting. 95% of the time I am just a quiet observer in social events.

If they have need of me, they only need to address me directly. It's not as if I am wearing cans or anything. Just doing some light reading. Think of me as a CPU that does it's own doodles until it receives an IRQ.
This is mainly about tvs, but you might want to take a look at this long term torture test, OLED tech have drastically improved compared to what it once was.
Yep, I do follow these tests for quite some time now. Also interesting to see LED models degrade. So far, given the working hours of my 6yr old TV, I seem to be darn lucky with it. Even a 50% grey test pic looks very good.

My SSD that I bought last year has 4280h logged. TV is almost always on when the computer is on. So my TV is nearing ~25000h of active time. Ofc I rarely run it at max brightness unless I play a game or watch a movie in HDR.

Guess it's better not to change ol' reliable. :'D
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
Improved yea, but I sure wouldn't want my expensive Sony TV to look like this after only a couple years use.
For my type use I'll still pass on OLED's.

That's because they are running torture tests.
1) they have simulated 13,200 hrs of wear. The most extreme users watch 5 hrs of tv a day, that equates to ~7.25 years.
2) the entire time they are on they are at maximum brightness.
3) the entire time they are on they only display CNN.

Take a look here after just 6000 hrs a lot of the lcds had burn in and or other display related issues.
Take a look at the LG NANO90 2021, Samsung TU8000, Samsung QN900A 8k QLED, Samsung The Frame 2022.


This is oled only burn in test, where they simulated 9064 hrs of wear.
Something you can see in their nice animations ("Uniformity Photos") is that static or repeted imagery at maximum brightness for long periods of time, is what causes burn in.
Update 05/31/2019: The TVs have been running for over 9000 hours (around five years at 5 hours every day). Uniformity issues have developed on the TVs displaying Football and FIFA 18 and are starting to develop on the TV displaying Live NBC. Our stance remains the same: we don't expect most people who watch varied content without static areas to experience burn-in issues with an OLED TV.

Update 11/05/2018: After more than 5000 hours, there has been no appreciable change to the brightness or color gamut of these TVs. Long periods of static content have resulted in some permanent burn-in (see the CNN TVs); however, the other TVs with more varied content don't yet have noticeable uniformity issues on normal content. As a result, we don't expect most people who watch varied content without static areas to experience burn-in issues with an OLED TV. Those who display the same static content over long periods should consider the risk of burn-in, though (like those who watch lots of news, use the TV as a PC monitor, or play the same game with a bright static HUD). Those concerned about the risk of burn-in should go with an LCD TV for peace of mind.

Note that we expect burn-in to depend on a few factors:

  • The total duration of static content. LG has told us that they expect it to be cumulative, so static content, which is present for 30 minutes twice a day, is equivalent to one hour of static content once per day.
  • The brightness of the static content. Our maximum brightness CNN TV has more severe burn-in than our 200 nits brightness CNN TV.
  • The colors of the static areas. We found that in our 20/7 Burn-In Test, the red sub-pixel is the fastest to degrade, followed by blue and then green.


Honestly if your use case is displaying the same image for long periods of time at high brightness, the best thing to do imo, is buy the cheapest display you can find that meets your minimum requirements. Regardless of tech they all have issues over time unless you baby them.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
So you have visible burn-in. As soon as you work with monochromatic content, e.g.: editing a texture in greyscale, you would notice it.
No I only notice on very bright and saturated pink/reddish. When working with an IPS or VA on the other hand I constantly notice the bad black levels, dull colors and splotchy backlight. I'd pick an OLED every day over a backlit screen, and that even if it only lasts for a few years, it just looks so much better!
 
:eek: God Forbid. LOL

Things got a lot better.. even my 65“ LG oled from 2021 has zero burn in yet and we use the TV daily .. even with a MacBook or gaming consoles where some things are constantly in the same place. And from what I understand it got even less likely to get burn-in with current computer screens . There are even some YouTubers that tried to get burn-in and had the screen for months showing the same picture.

Nothing. I take the picture quality of a real Oled over the QD oled and QD LED stuff :)

My next computer monitor is going to be a OLED as well.
 
No I only notice on very bright and saturated pink/reddish. When working with an IPS or VA on the other hand I constantly notice the bad black levels, dull colors and splotchy backlight. I'd pick an OLED every day over a backlit screen, and that even if it only lasts for a few years, it just looks so much better!
The new Inkjet OLED technology is supposedly more sturdy.

My choice for movies will always be OLED, but for computer I don't want to risk burn ins. Not sure I would want to game on an OLED TV either really
There are obviously things which the games could use to prevent burn in as well as TV stations, they could for instance move the logos around and also make them weaker
 
And from what I understand it got even less likely to get burn-in with current computer screens . There are even some YouTubers that tried to get burn-in and had the screen for months showing the same picture.
Monitors are designed with PC usage and lots of static content in mind, so that's to be expected.
TV's really are not.

OLED monitors also do not get as bright as an OLED TV and these get nowhere nearly as bright as a good LED TV, which is important for good HDR performance.

Until micro LED comes along and (supposedly) can do it all, display technologies are still "pick your poison according to usage".
 
display technologies are still "pick your poison according to usage
Amen. Much like audio the final result with TOTL gear depends more on the quality of the source than anything.
I find my 85" Samsung full array, mini QLED to deliver a stunning picture from the best HDR 4k sources.
Blacks are inky, enough brightness to look great even in a well lit room, color & resolution to die for.
The best picture quality I've ever viewed. I really could ask for little more.
I live alone and don't watch off axis so that's a complete non-issue.
My sole complaint is the anti reflection coating used but it only causes issues with very bright side lighting at a particular angle.
 
Last edited:
Amen. Much like audio the final result with TOTL gear depends more on the quality of the source than anything.
I find my 85" Samsung full array, mini QLED to deliver a stunning picture from the best HDR 4k sources.
Blacks are inky, brightness to look great even in a well lit room, color & resolution to die for.
The best picture quality I've ever viewed. I really could ask for little more.
I live alone and don't watch off axis so that's a complete non-issue.
My sole complaint is the anti reflection coating used but it only causes issues with very bright side lighting at a particular angle.
After my cataract & intraocular lenses surgeries, all my screens were suddenly brighter and not parchment yellow!
 
I find my 85" Samsung full array, mini QLED to deliver a stunning picture from the best HDR 4k sources.
Aye, I've heard & read good things about Mini-LED screens. It'll be interesting to see if they advance the tech further and make it available for smaller screen sizes with the same amount of zones (that's the real kicker and why 85" is better than their 65" versions).
 
Wow! Pretty good. When they have 120" for that price I'll probably bite. Then I could replace my projector.

There is a 110 inch for $14,999 so just a matter of time.

PS I have read lots of horror stories about the reliability of the 90 inch plus screens however.
 
Exactly what are the better features for QLED? As i know a mainstream LG C serie OLED has better features than basically any QLED.
Btwetter QLEDS are paired with local dimming that have issues with blooming, the input lag is usually much worse than OLEDs, there are ssues with viewing angle (this one is actually a problem with bigger tv even if you stand in front of them), there are issues with backlight bleeding, banding artifacts.
 
PS I have read lots of horror stories about the reliability of the 90 inch plus screens however.
Really, I wasn't aware but then I haven't followed any forums, etc to know.
I can't see any reason for that except that they may be making very poor quality panels to hit low price points ??
I'd wouldn't expect much in the way of picture quality from an edge lit 100" screen like that TLC anywho, but I'd never consider buying one myself.
OTOH maybe for a basement family room where the kids watch TV and throw balls around it might be something to consider. LOL
How many years ago was it that the flat panels were first arriving with 6 digit price tags for 55" sets? LOL
Man how times have changed.

Exactly what are the better features for QLED? As i know a mainstream LG C serie OLED has better features than basically any QLED.
Brightness and viewability in bright rooms with HDR sources.
I was never impressed with the performance of OLED and HDR movies, specially ones with a lot of dark scenes.
OLED's big plus with blacks has now been equaled with QLED panels and maybe to be surpaseed by the new micro LEDs

And for me the #1 feature is the near immunity from burn-in, that's a big one for me.
For the last few years, when comparing the TOTL QLEDs to OLEDS, any difference in the overall picture quality was small enough
to push the pendulum to buying the QLED.
YMMV
 

How many years ago was it that the flat panels were first arriving with 6 digit price tags for 55" sets? LOL
Man how times have changed.

We bought our 55” plasma display maybe 18 years ago, and paid under $2000 for it. So it’s been a while:)

Rick “still using it” Denney
 
Back
Top Bottom