A quick video dealing with claims that a power cord that is not driving something can't be source of AC interference:
I'm going to be contrarian guy and say I'd rather read it. I love reading, and for me reading is way, way faster than the time a video of the same content requires.Thanks for the quick vid. This format is more attractive to people who don't want to dive to deep (or dislike reading in general) and could definitely help some folks save their money in the future
I'm going to be contrarian guy and say I'd rather read it. I love reading, and for me reading is way, way faster than the time a video of the same content requires.
It's not an impossibility.Usually iam on your side, reading is great. But sometimes a video is just greater.
The guy from GR Research. Beef!Didn't watch the video (can't at work), but who made the claim a power cord could not be an interference source unless it was driving something? Plug it in, and there is a voltage field created, even if the current is practically zero, and you have a 60 Hz (or whatever) high-voltage source plus whatever noise is on the line.
Ah, 'nuff said. Doubters could just take an extension cord, plug it in (to the wall, no load), and wrap it around an AM radio to see what happens.The guy from GR Research. Beef!
Danny @ GR Research.who made the claim a power cord could not be an interference source unless it was driving something?
Haha who had thought that testing a yeah lets say "a not so good speaker" could be a inspiration for such a good video?
i agree, for me its the better format.Thanks for the quick vid. This format is more attractive to people who don't want to dive to deep (or dislike reading in general) and could definitely help some folks save their money in the future
^^^This is Professor Bit-perfect Amir, preparing to Cast a Stupify spell with a Power Wand!^^^A quick video dealing with claims that a power cord that is not driving something can't be source of AC interference: