Its because LCD tv's tend to use PVA panels which have pretty bad viewing angles. You could use IPS panels, and some TV's do, but then your black levels (and contrast ratio) take a major hit.Also note that both TVs have pretty poor viewing angles.
Its because LCD tv's tend to use PVA panels which have pretty bad viewing angles. You could use IPS panels, and some TV's do, but then your black levels (and contrast ratio) take a major hit.Also note that both TVs have pretty poor viewing angles.
I have a 83” Sony OLED A90J, absolutely hated it, much too dark, even in a room with the lights turned off, black out curtains closed, it was still hard to make out what was going on for certain shows, here in Florida, absolutely useless to watch in the daytime, yes I could keep the curtains closed, but then would feel like a shut in.Compared to other LCDs yes, but don't put them next to an OLED. If you care about performance in a dark or dimmed room there is no contest. But if you barely or never watch tv like that it doesn't matter. For me its simply not an option. The only LCD tv I'd consider would need a mini LCD display at the minimum, TCL has one coming up but it starts at 85".
If you have never seen an OLED in a dark room you won't know what you are missing though, so if you are dead set on getting an LCD then don't go look at an OLED in a dark room.
This is a calibration issue in conjunction with the content you are watching. From what I understand, some of the shows encoded in Dolby Vision don't display correctly. You should use regular HDR whenever possible.I have a 83” Sony OLED A90J, absolutely hated it, much too dark, even in a room with the lights turned off, black out curtains closed, it was still hard to make out what was going on for certain shows, here in Florida, absolutely useless to watch in the daytime, yes I could keep the curtains closed, but then would feel like a shut in.
The last episode of Obi Wan, certain episodes of GOT, could not make out what was going on, that TV is now in one of my Guest Rooms.

In a light room I can see you having those issues due to reflections (LCD suffer from that a little less), but in a completely dark room its a calibration or setup issue for sure. Are you sure you have it in one the movie/cinema mode?I have a 83” Sony OLED A90J, absolutely hated it, much too dark, even in a room with the lights turned off, black out curtains closed, it was still hard to make out what was going on for certain shows, here in Florida, absolutely useless to watch in the daytime, yes I could keep the curtains closed, but then would feel like a shut in.
The last episode of Obi Wan, certain episodes of GOT, could not make out what was going on, that TV is now in one of my Guest Rooms.
Extremely happier with the LED.
generally $300-600 usd is what I have seen for cost.I would just go with the recommended calibration settings on the rtings. If pro calibration settings needed, I wonder how much that would cost.
As a general rule, I think 2x the cost gives you some improvement, 3x cost gives you big improvements.On Amazon the QM851G is 1800.00and the QM751GIS 1100.00.
That means that the QM851G price is 63% higher that the QM751G.
Who wants to keep watching in a totally dark room all the time, there is something called daylight that people enjoy, why have a Television that limits you to only a few hours before going to bed.In a light room I can see you having those issues due to reflections (LCD suffer from that a little les), but in a completely dark room its a calibration or setup issue for sure.
I tried it in all formats, that last episode of Obi Wan was brutal, the light saber colors were great, but that was all I could make out on the Sony A90J.Are you sure you have it in one the movie/cinema mode?
Looks great on the TCL.Also remember that some movies or tv shows are simply that dark. For example, that famous night battle episode in GoT was just too dark on any screen.
Who wants to keep watching in a totally dark room all the time, there is something called daylight that people enjoy, why have a Television that limits you to only a few hours before going to bed.
I watch TV during the day ( retired at age 52, now 5 years ago), I refuse to do so with the curtains closed all the time.
That is the problem with OLED, certain times of the day affect the viewing quality, no such limitations with the LED, day/night, great picture.
I tried it in all formats, that last episode of Obi Wan was brutal, the light saber colors were great, but that was all I could make out on the Sony A90J.
That same episode looks great on the LED, can make out everything , still has great black levels, so a very detailed picture, where I can see what is going on.
Looks great on the TCL.
I have zero issues with watching OLED at night or day with my LG G1, now 2 generations behind.No issue on my older LG OLED (Sony uses LG panels).
Sony uses Samsung paneles. It is QD-OLED, versus LG WOLED. At least new generations. Older generations might used LG.Ok, that is 100% a settings issue on the Sony. No issue on my older LG OLED (Sony uses LG panels).
I saw a Hisense 65 inch “ULED” tv In Costco that blew me away, for $379. 60 Hz refresh.Compared to other LCDs yes, but don't put them next to an OLED. If you care about performance in a dark or dimmed room there is no contest. But if you barely or never watch tv like that it doesn't matter. For me its simply not an option. The only LCD tv I'd consider would need a mini LCD display at the minimum, TCL has one coming up but it starts at 85".
If you have never seen an OLED in a dark room you won't know what you are missing though, so if you are dead set on getting an LCD then don't go look at an OLED in a dark room.
I must say, about a year ago I saw a HiSense 65UXKQ in the store. The local dimming and black levels were pretty impressive for an LCD. Even the viewing angles weren't too bad on that one. But $379 is crazy for a 65" TV, though (the 65UXKQ one was about € 1600 at the time (it still is)).I saw a Hisense 65 inch “ULED” tv In Costco that blew me away, for $379. 60 Hz refresh.
Older ones used LG for sure, because they were the only ones making panels for quite a while (apart from the very start, but I don't think Sony made any OLED tvs then).Sony uses Samsung paneles. It is QD-OLED, versus LG WOLED. At least new generations. Older generations might used LG.
Insides stores I think most LCDs look fine these days. The environment is just too bright to see the issues with the black levels and local dimming.I must say, about a year ago I saw a HiSense 65UXKQ in the store. The local dimming and black levels were pretty impressive for an LCD. Even the viewing angles weren't too bad on that one. But $379 is crazy for a 65" TV, though (the 65UXKQ one was about € 1600 at the time (it still is)).
These also look great on an LCD. The real test is truly dark content with bright small objects.Again, put one of those 4K HDR nature test videos on and you'll see the OLED is working splendidly.
Like this one.
Or this one.
Maybe, it for sure wasn't the best environment, but it wasn't a very bright store either.Insides stores I think most LCDs look fine these days. The environment is just too bright to see the issues with the black levels and local dimming.
They actually had something similar on screen, with tiny, bright highlights moving around. It still looked impressive with little to no blooming. Obviously, not OLED-impressive, but still, much, much better than I expected!This is more of a pure test, but you can see this happen in some SciFi movies. Will look like absolute ass on anything with local dimming.
In my opinion the video processing is often more important than the panels themselves. I have see identically set up Sonys and LGs and Sonys and Samsungs where we were comparing the Sony with the identical LG or Samsung panels. The Sony video processing creates a more fluid and lifelike depiction of motion and more natural looking contrast.Sony uses Samsung paneles. It is QD-OLED, versus LG WOLED. At least new generations. Older generations might used LG.
I would suggest to watch few videos on HDTVTest youtube channel. I would say it's ASR for TVsIn my opinion the video processing is often more important than the panels themselves. I have see identically set up Sonys and LGs and Sonys and Samsungs where we were comparing the Sony with the identical LG or Samsung panels. The Sony video processing creates a more fluid and lifelike depiction of motion and more natural looking contrast.
I have made my comparisons standing a few feet away from the actual TVs after ISF calibration. I am not sure how you can measure what I am describing as it is a subjective perception of motion. As for contrast, that you probably can measure, but I am looking for what appears to me to be "natural looking" contrast and not necessarily the greatest range of perceptible contrast.I would suggest to watch few videos on HDTVTest youtube channel. I would say it's ASR for TVsYou are right in general about video processing but not necessarily in this case. Sony QD-OLED TVs has a better color saturation in very bright areas. LG WOLED wins in near black handling and overall HDR brightness. Saying what you said about Sony it's the same as saying Marantz is more musical than Denon. Panasonic has best video processing, but unfortunately their top tier model is only 65 inch.
Mine (similar if not exact same model) lasted 2 months before going on the fritz. After weeks, a tech came and tried one thing, stripped it and destroyed it, and they sent me a check. And left me to dispose of it. To the credit of hisense, while they slow walked the warranty process, once they had their report from the tech the check came very quickly.HiSense 65UXKQ i... But $379 is crazy for a 65" TV,