• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

TANCHJIM Space Portable Headphone Adapter Review

Rate this DAC & HP Amp

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 3 1.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 3 1.0%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 38 12.6%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 257 85.4%

  • Total voters
    301
Tanchjim Luna now released - 130 usd.

I like that it has 2 versions, one standard and sober, and the other waifu for those who like this.

2 x CS43198 based, which is the DAC chip without HP amp from Cirrus Logic, and instead using their own amp stage.

Specs are slightly better but to be honest it is beyond transparent as the Space 90 usd already is.
 
Tanchjim Luna now released - 130 usd.
Thank you for that, but has anyone seen this:
I just ordered one on impulse!
 
Thank you for that, but has anyone seen this:
I just ordered one on impulse!
That looks cool but presumably very similar to the Space?
 
Tanchjim Luna now released - 130 usd.

I like that it has 2 versions, one standard and sober, and the other waifu for those who like this.

2 x CS43198 based, which is the DAC chip without HP amp from Cirrus Logic, and instead using their own amp stage.

Specs are slightly better but to be honest it is beyond transparent as the Space 90 usd already is.
it would be interesting to know what type of op-amp they used for the amp stage (maybe the well known SGM\Ricore?) and the real effect of that class AB\H switch, bridge is still the CT7601 so Asio drivers are available and surely interesting the managing app (even though I prefer devices with few setting that you can manage via hardware buttons).

Thank you for that, but has anyone seen this:
I just ordered one on impulse!
here I see nothing more than any other classic dual CS43131 dongle, power statement is overrated and obviously referring to L+R combined power, honestly I can't find it competitive when Moondrop Dawn Pro and Sonata BHD are available at much lower price.
 
here I see nothing more than any other classic dual CS43131 dongle, power statement is overrated and obviously referring to L+R combined power, honestly I can't find it competitive when Moondrop Dawn Pro and Sonata BHD are available at much lower price.
If that's the case, and power is not 500mW/ch, then I shall return it.
In UK, the SMSL and the Sonata are the same price.
Would SMSL, be so naive to think they could get away with it?
We'll see when it arrives, I will check it, measure both channel being driven, to see what it can do.
 
If that's the case, and power is not 500mW/ch, then I shall return it.
In UK, the SMSL and the Sonata are the same price.
Would SMSL, be so naive to think they could get away with it?
We'll see when it arrives, I will check it, measure both channel being driven, to see what it can do.
CS43131 amp stage capabilities are well known and at 32 ohm should not be much different than this:

index.php


So without additional op-amps (not mentioned) 500 mW per channel are technically impossible.
 
Last edited:
CS43131 amp stage capabilities are well known and at 32 ohm should not be much different than this:
So without additional op-amps (not mentioned) 500 mW per channel are technically impossible.
It is not as simple as that. The chip can manage 30mW into 32R, yet the Tempotec can manage 80mW (280mW bal).
It is not that hard to add output drivers to boost it up. 300/350mW is quite possible (voltage swings of 4.5V) without a charge-pump PSU.
Anyways, I will check.
 
It is not as simple as that. The chip can manage 30mW into 32R, yet the Tempotec can manage 80mW (280mW bal).
It is not that hard to add output drivers to boost it up. 300/350mW is quite possible (voltage swings of 4.5V) without a charge-pump PSU.
Anyways, I will check.
the officially advertised 30 mW @ 32R are (strangely) way less than what results practically from any CS43131 unit I've seen measured, all of them show results in line with the graph I linked, I simply doubt smsl would achieve something so different unless they used additional op-amp stage, that they didn't mention (but still possible).
 
the officially advertised 30 mW @ 32R are (strangely) way less than what results practically from any CS43131 unit I've seen measured, all of them show results in line with the graph I linked, I simply doubt smsl would achieve something so different unless they used additional op-amp stage, that they didn't mention (but still possible).
It is not fix-able by opamps. USB voltage is no more than 5V.
You need the voltage-swing to output more power.
the 4.5V I mentioned, in balanced mode, can give just over 3V RMS, hence the power output of 300mW or so.
Unless one uses a dc-dc upconversion. Which is still possible.
 
It is not fix-able by opamps. USB voltage is no more than 5V.
You need the voltage-swing to output more power.
the 4.5V I mentioned, in balanced mode, can give just over 3V RMS, hence the power output of 300mW or so.
Unless one uses a dc-dc upconversion. Which is still possible.
Well, on the same specs sheet they also advertise max output level of 2 Vrms...
Clearly it is referred to the 3.5 output (i hope) but just to say how much you can trust those info...
I bet it will give out the "standard" 2V/4V at line level just like my Sonata BHD, and obviously less at 32R, let us know your measurements.
 
Reporting back on S.M.S.L D10
In my opinion, looks nice, looks the part, but it is CRAP!
First and foremost, it sounds crap! (with my LCD-XC). no amount of EQing does any good, I think the one I got was faulty, didn't last 15 minutes (Edit: before I decided to send it back).
It was a bright, distorted sound, that also clipped & compressed badly if pushed. It had more power on balanced, which incidentally, I had to make a new cable for it.
But more power, with the same distortions and brightness of single ended. Maybe it just doesn't like my headphone's impedance of 20R.
I was looking forward to testing the device, see how much actual power it had, but very quickly, I repackage it to send it back.
Last point! - I did try an Apple dongle in the past. I can not recall it sounding bad, it just had no power. My Huawei phone sounds superior to D10, but again, no power.
 
Last edited:
Reporting back on S.M.S.L D10
In my opinion, looks nice, looks the part, but it is CRAP!
First and foremost, it sounds crap! (with my LCD-XC). no amount of EQing does any good, I think the one I got was faulty, didn't last 15 minutes (Edit: before I decided to send it back).
It was a bright, distorted sound, that also clipped & compressed badly if pushed. It had more power on balanced, which incidentally, I had to make a new cable for it.
But more power, with the same distortions and brightness of single ended. Maybe it just doesn't like my headphone's impedance of 20R.
I was looking forward to testing the device, see how much actual power it had, but very quickly, I repackage it to send it back.
Last point! - I did try an Apple dongle in the past. I can not recall it sounding bad, it just had no power. My Huawei phone sounds superior to D10, but again, no power.
It's too bad, seems actually a faulty unit, I own 3 different CS43131 dongles (vanilla, with op-amp and dual vanilla) and all sounds the same to me and perfect. I have to say that I only have iems (Zero:Red is 17R and no issue at all) and efficient headphones and I listen at moderately low volume, so never pushed them too much. LCD-XC is rate at 100 dBmW @ 20R -> 83 dbV if i did the math right, so maybe a bit hard to drive even with balanced out, but bright and distorted sound at any level seems very strange if not a failed unit.
 
It's too bad, seems actually a faulty unit, I own 3 different CS43131 dongles (vanilla, with op-amp and dual vanilla) and all sounds the same to me and perfect. I have to say that I only have iems (Zero:Red is 17R and no issue at all) and efficient headphones and I listen at moderately low volume, so never pushed them too much. LCD-XC is rate at 100 dBmW @ 20R -> 83 dbV if i did the math right, so maybe a bit hard to drive even with balanced out, but bright and distorted sound at any level seems very strange if not a failed unit.
uhm, and indeed it seems i completely missed the math... wrong calculator... the LCD-XC should be pretty efficient, at 100 db/mW 20R it is 117 dbV and should need no more than 70 mV to get 94 db (220 mV for 104 dB)

Immagine 2024-09-11 143252.jpg

so every dongle should be more than enough even with SE output.

Amir measured LCD-X at 150 mv for 94 dB that should be around 93 db/mW @ 20R instead of rated 103 db/mW so LCD-XC could also actually be less sensitive, but not challenging.

Anyway nothing of this can be related to the sound issue you perceived, and if the dongle have some kind of flaw even power considerations can't be done.
 
uhm, and indeed it seems i completely missed the math... wrong calculator... the LCD-XC should be pretty efficient, at 100 db/mW 20R it is 117 dbV and should need no more than 70 mV to get 94 db (220 mV for 104 dB)

View attachment 391575
so every dongle should be more than enough even with SE output.

Amir measured LCD-X at 150 mv for 94 dB that should be around 93 db/mW @ 20R instead of rated 103 db/mW so LCD-XC could also actually be less sensitive, but not challenging.

Anyway nothing of this can be related to the sound issue you perceived, and if the dongle have some kind of flaw even power considerations can't be done.
Here are the numbers:
Screenshot_20240911-152234_Sheets.png
 
uhm, and indeed it seems i completely missed the math... wrong calculator... the LCD-XC should be pretty efficient, at 100 db/mW 20R it is 117 dbV and should need no more than 70 mV to get 94 db (220 mV for 104 dB)

View attachment 391575
so every dongle should be more than enough even with SE output.

Amir measured LCD-X at 150 mv for 94 dB that should be around 93 db/mW @ 20R instead of rated 103 db/mW so LCD-XC could also actually be less sensitive, but not challenging.

Anyway nothing of this can be related to the sound issue you perceived, and if the dongle have some kind of flaw even power considerations can't be done.
Yeah, high powered headphones amps really are unnecessary for the majority of headphones.
 
Yeah, high powered headphones amps really are unnecessary for the majority of headphones.
And we have discussed this before.
Proof of the pudding is in the eating. When you or somebody you know has confirmed practically that an LCD-X runs loud and nice on 100mW or 1.4V , let me know.
Indeed let Audeze know, because they foolishly have recommended 250mW! (2.25V).
After all, what do they know.

Read here, and follow it up to second reply by Amir. It is about a similar subject:
Post in thread 'Chord Hugo 2 Review (Portable DAC & HP Amp)' https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...review-portable-dac-hp-amp.35812/post-1681225
 
Last edited:
And we have discussed this before.
Proof of the pudding is in the eating. When you or somebody you know has confirmed practically that an LCD-X runs loud and nice on 100mW or 1.4V , let me know.
Indeed let Audeze know, because they foolishly have recommended 250mW! (2.25V).
After all, what do they know.

Read here, and follow it up to second reply by Amir. It is about a similar subject:
Post in thread 'Chord Hugo 2 Review (Portable DAC & HP Amp)' https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...review-portable-dac-hp-amp.35812/post-1681225
Well yes it depends what volume you listen to mus6at. Need to bear in mind though that if you're listening in the 80db range that is pretty loud and there are going to be peaks in the 90s at least.
 
Well, the S.M.S.L has been returned.
I just ordered the new E1DA 9039S from Hifigo for £110!
That's a lot of money for a dongle. But according to Archimago, it is the Bee's knees, with over 500mW each channel (wow).
Should get it in two weeks. Will report back.

 
Back
Top Bottom