Not to argue - but what that has to do with my post? I will not disclose my real estate holdings, although they are substantial and have nothing to do with the topic?
My question was really simple and directed to OP that has relevant facts.
I was being informative in general.
Those are not my real estate holdings, it's simple: various family members that I have visited all over the world do not have carpets.
It seems to be a common thing these days. Perhaps why his subs came with those rubber doughnuts. It also makes the rooms very live & hard to EQ.
But they won't listen to me when I try to tell them that they should have some soft items. Perhaps a tapestry on a wall here & there or heavy curtains.
So, the relevant fact is that I was indicating that many people around the world do not have carpet anymore.
(The 70' shag era must have been excessively overdone world wide or something.)
Do they have carpet?: My relatives on a farm in a village in Austria don't, my relatives in China don't, my friends in Guam don't, my mother only has a throw rug in her home and my friends homes here don't. So based on my experiences traveling, carpets are no longer in vogue.
I simply passed on my observations.
As to my personnel finances, I do not have much (a small amount of cash, no investments) but I do not have any debt.
The whole of my only real estate holding is under 800 square feet three pictures:
Inside front to back:
Back to front:
outside:
What made you think that anything I said had anything to do with you, personally?
I am having trouble fathoming that.