I would find such a measurement particularly interesting with a very dirty VCC 5V and GND and the effect on the D+/D- data line.This is a review and detailed measurements of the performance of Supra Swedish USB audio cable. It was kindly donated to the forum by a member and sells for US $53 for 2 meter length:
View attachment 466648
I like the light gray look and rather beefy construction. Alas, the latter makes it difficult to rotate the cable -- something you need to do as you align both ends of the cable to plug into their respective sockets. This can also put strain on the connectors and or lift light/rotate weight devices. There are worse offenders to be sure but would be good for cable companies to take this into consideration when making premium cables.
Company names the usual claims about the cable, but also some rarely seen electrical specs:
Features & Benefits:
Mechanical Specifications
- Long cables lengths - provides for long distances between devices
- Correct data transfer - utmost sound capabilities
- Perfect shielding and twinning - minimum signal degradation
- Robust type A and type B connectors - reliable, long mobile life
- Made in Sweden - Modern research, production and quality
Standard USB 2.0, Hi-Speed Connectors USB A Male to USB B Male Signal Direction: <-> Application Examples: Computer, DAC Data transfer rate: 480 Mbit/s Solder Tin: Almit SR-34 Super Cable clamping: Molded
Electrical performance
Number of pairs: 2 Cross Area: 0.24 / 23 mm2/AWG No. Wires/Conductor: 19 Wire diameter : 0.127 (mm) Wire Material: Tin Plated OFC Insulation: PE Screen: Aluminium/Pet Foil Jacket: PVC Flameretardancy: No Ext. Size 7.5 (mm) Weight 56 (g/m)
Resistance: 72 (Ohm/km) C: 52 (pF/m) Imp. Z: 90 Ohm Velo. Factor 0.66c
It would have been nice to see actual performance measurements such as eye pattern. Still, they are providing far more data than many expensive audiophile USB cables.
Supra USB Audio Cable Measurements
As usual, we want to create a reference for our testing so I grabbed a random 6 foot, rather thin USB cable and measured the Topping D70s with it:
View attachment 466649
Swapping for Supra cable shows the usual run to run variations and nothing more:
View attachment 466650
Dynamic range shows the same:
View attachment 466651
Finally, jitter measurement shows no difference:
View attachment 466652
With USB interface, the USB clock is not used for the DAC anyway so external jitter wouldn't matter. But if the cable picked up noise, it could get transmitted to the DAC. Fortunately, in these short lengths and with a quality DAC, we see that there is no difference.
Conclusion
I know many of you would guess that the USB cable would make no difference but it is important to test to make sure there is negative consequence either. Such is the case here. Unlike typical audiophile cables, you are hardly paying a premium for the Supra cable. Granted a free one comes with your DAC but with inflation what it is, $53 for something made in Sweden doesn't make my blood pressure go up.
While personally I have no use for the Supra USB cable, I won't be complaining if you bought one, especially if your in EU.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
darko.audio
perhaps Amir can also test with the infamous Schiit Modi 2 DAC.I would find such a measurement particularly interesting with a very dirty VCC 5V and GND and the effect on the D+/D- data line.
The second point would be a measurement with a proven DAC powered via USB, e.g., the SMSL SU-1, additionally with a dirty power supply for comparison.
The third point would be the measurement of longer cables for comparison, such as 3m and 5m, and lengths outside the specification, e.g., 7.5m and 10m.


There's a bit of snake oil marketing talk with Supra. Just ignore it. Silly I admit, but Supra is trying to fish for the cable-believing subjectivists. Supra's products and prices are okay though.in my opinion SUPRA items are a mixed bags, some of them smelling a bit as snake oil. E.g. see their analog interconnects. I have had also their premium Excalibur USB cable, with its star-quad power wires configuration: much more expensive and NOT USB certified. Anyway helped with a USB powered DAC, 5 metres far from the laptop. Other cables failed to power it.

This is not the first time I've heard that ferrite cores on USB cables for DACs can impact how well they measure, specifically in terms of jitter performance. Has @amirm or anyone else with proper measurement gear conducted this type of test?Well, modern DACs know how to handle PC noise. I used to have the original Schiit Modi and boy was it sensitive to noise. I measured the Modi's output using RMAA and my E-MU 0404 USB and there was repeatable measurable difference between different USB cables. Mind you I only had cheap ones on hand, no fancy expensive cables. What made the biggest difference in the cables was whether it had a ferrite choke or not. In the end the best way I found to get rid of as much of the noise as possible was to use a USB hub. I had a couple USB 2.0 hubs laying around and some let through more noise than others. I spent a lot of time measuing the Modi with all the different calbes and USB hubs and in the end I sold it to someone who did not care as long as he could not hear the noise.
Slightly OT: What was very cool at the time was that I had one of the Gigabyte Z97 motherboards that had 2 special USB 2.0 ports that were dedicated to be used for a DAC and the Modi had measurably less noise when connected via those USB ports compared to all the other USB ports on that motherboard. Shame that modern motherboards don't have those. But as shown in this review, modern DACs don't seem to need them, if well-designed.
Exactly.Looks unwieldy. Would stick to Anker or ugreen from Amazon personally
Learning from some scattered posts on ASR, (if I learned right...) the role of ferrites on USB cables has zero impact on the cable itself, due to the frequencies of the signals running in the cable. Their role is only to make the DAC or other device to be compliant with EMI rules in various countries, absorbing them and avoid that they pollute the environment. So if the DAC is engineered correctly not to spread EMI, ferrite beads do nothing.This is not the first time I've heard that ferrite cores on USB cables for DACs can impact how well they measure, specifically in terms of jitter performance. Has @amirm or anyone else with proper measurement gear conducted this type of test?
SuperconductorMaybe the real capability of the cable only appears when it is as freezing cold as in Sweden.
This audiophile grade 1kg obsidian ball is essential to my system. The secret is: regularly submerging it in magic soldering-flux imported from Madagascar and polishing with an antistatic cloth. Works only on speakers with real wood veneer. Oce you found the right placement on any component the results are truly unbelievable!At least it works... For real "believers" probably too cheap anyway...
But seriously: For today's often small and light devices, such cables (and even more, thick speaker cables) can be a problem, because the tiny boxes are being displaced by their weight. But then, another "upgrade" can help
![]()
An update on hi-fi doorstops | Darko.Audio
And the beginning of a deeper dive into the Amazon affiliate programme.darko.audio