You need perforated masonry above 10 cm rock-wool panels as a base behind the speakers. Then add 6 cm wedged foam. You will get broadband absorption to about 100 Hz, it depends on the c-c spacing and size of the holes.
For a quick trial before I buy the more expensive acoustic panels, I placed some cheap 2-inch thick acoustic foam panels covering the wall behind the speakers. The sound became very dull while the bass didn't boom much anymore. I guess it's because the treble is also sucked out by the panels.
Should I remedy it with the KH80's DSP like adjusting room resonant time (I guess the speakers will then lengthen the decay time) and pushing up the treble? or is the cheap foam material the problem? Thanks.
You need perforated masonry above 10 cm rock-wool panels as a base behind the speakers. Then add 6 cm wedged foam. You will get broadband absorption to about 100 Hz, it depends on the c-c spacing and size of the holes.
We're not trying to make an anechoic chamber here.
I can quite accurately reproduce my LP, though whenever I hear the sound different, I would move my head slightly in all directions so find the sweet spot again.
When I get back to my room later, I'll recalibrate the speakers on the Neumann control app, adjusting only for the lower resonating time in my room now with the panels. I have just found that, without the panels, telling the app about how much furniture/ carpet I have in my room which changes the estimated resonating time does change the sound in a range from "dull" to "clangy".
I guess with the panels (I'll look at some more appropriate materials later), the sound should be more correct, taking out the environmental factors as much as possible, but I need to tell the speakers about the change in my room so that the speakers can behave differently to produce the new "correct" sound as preset and intended by Neumann.
Thanks for all the advice!
Haha I know, but no, you will not get anechoic with just two panels, one behind each speakers. I made such panels once and they work well without being expensive, hard to make or extremely deep. 16 cm total depth (6 inch) is manageable.
I mean you don't want to aggressively absorb high frequencies like that regardless of how many panels you will end up adding.
He's better off with a diffraction plate on top. 6 inch means that the effective frequency of the panel will be close to ~550Hz, while most issues in rooms are below that not above it.
From my experience wedged foam absorbs High frequencies VERY aggressively to the point that it might further color the room than actually help fixing it.
Behind the speakers will in principle only decrease those fr that either become omni (hence needing better absorption down to 100 Hz), and second, making sure that any sound coming from that side will be from the speakers only. It increases clarity, dynamics while retaining a good listening environment. A perforated panel can be made to act to 100 Hz (600 Hz for foam use only). Of course limited in effectiveness due to small size but anyhow much better than just a wall.
That is why you need a base panel with perforated masonry.
I'm not really sure to be honest, in my experience, second reflections (>10ms) should be maintained instead of aggressively neutralized as they don't pollute transients and give the room 'air' and 'ambiance'.