JBL SUB18 for example. Plug holes and it will be better than mine old subs with $111 driversCOTS subwoofers that go
JBL SUB18 for example. Plug holes and it will be better than mine old subs with $111 driversCOTS subwoofers that go
This is true but how "high fidelity" is it if the relative amplitudes of these overtones are changed a lot because of harmonic distortion?I suppose when considered with playback of said 16Hz organ note on a playback system of subs, etc, then you might question what is the real world importance of reproducing the 16Hz part of the note when it's the overtones that are higher up that is what is really heard or "experienced" by the listener - and if it was only really the overtones that were important for the 16Hz note on the organ then you might not kill yourself trying to get your stereo to playback 16Hz properly, which might be what @Hayabusa is getting at. I think that's what he's getting at.
You are right I would have been better to quote the 'THD' or maybe call it THC 'Total Harmonic Content'You think????
Why are there so many different stops then? The organ builders built in LOTS of different overtones to create interest and variability.
The only pipes without extra colour added are the "flutes" AFAIK
In the Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral organ - the first one I have been to younger than me - there are 4565 pipes and it can mimic a large proportion of a traditional orchestra (with various levels of accuracy...)
It isn't the biggest or most complex either.
If you believe that bollox the only musical instruments which don't distort are the flute family.
You are right I would have been better to quote the 'THD' or maybe call it THC 'Total Harmonic Content'![]()

Yes, I don't have the answers for that, it appears no one does. It's the kind of thing where you buy the best engineered sub you can find & afford that you think is worth the money. That graph that I linked a while back is one way to compare the subs tested but yeah we're all not sure on if the distortion criteria are too lenient. We're just back to the beginning again, at least we can see a comparison of the subs and choose the better performing ones if we want.This is true but how "high fidelity" is it if the relative amplitudes of these overtones are changed a lot because of harmonic distortion?
The timbre of a note is defined by the amplitude of the overtones (and any fluctuation with time) so any change to these obviously changes the timbre - at what point this is audible, noticeable and important I don't know.
Audibility of bass distortion has always been said to be low but is that because listeners are less familiar with the timbre of instruments which play in the bass?
Room gain is very dependent on wall construction. In Europe you have mainly masonry walls. Awesome room gain. In Canada, America you have wood framed walls. Essentially invisible below 30 hertz.Yes, room gain is often forgotten. I get 100dB at 20hz with a single sub in my dedicated listening room. You typically get a much higher value than the CEA/CTA2010 tests tell you in an actual room, as they're measured outside at 2m.
You can discern pitch, another way to say hear tones much lower than 20 hertz.Really?
I hadn't checked but on the basis of listening to a lot of 32' pipes on organs when on choir music tours to various cathedrals I had assumed it was higher since I can hear it rather than just feel it.
I read the comments in between. I'll bite. What ever the instrument produced, if it is picked up via mics with sufficiently small added distortions is what you would have heard there, at the original sound venue.Ever checked the harmonic distortion of these tones? The fundamental is barely audible with all the harmonics on top of it...
(I mean the THD of the organ it self)
You can discern pitch, another way to say hear tones much lower than 20 hertz.
Here is one of the latest studies on low frequency perception. The criteria is twofold high enough SPL and freedom form extraneous harmonics.
View attachment 474297
Mark
Definitely. When I get back to the confuzer.Do you perhaps have a reference to the study?
I found a linkDo you perhaps have a reference to the study?
Definitely. When I get back to the confuzer.
Probably true, but that does not mean that we do not perceive sounds which are pitched below 20Hz, just that we do not perceive their pitch. That is, we are unable to reliably identify their pitch.After a brief read it looks to imply the opposite, that we do not perceive pitch below 20hz.
Probably true, but that does not mean that we do not perceive sounds which are pitched below 20Hz, just that we do not perceive their pitch. That is, we are unable to reliably identify their pitch.
Didn't mean to imply you did, but your observation did provide a convenient place to start discussing the musical information (and performance artifacts) which exists well below what we readily perceive as pitch.Sure, I was just curious about the claim that we could actually identify pitch below 20hz, so that is what I commented, not that we can't hear anything below 20hz.
Didn't mean to imply you did, but your observation did provide a convenient place to start discussing the musical information (and performance artifacts) which exists well below what we readily perceive as pitch.
Again I only took the THD metaphor to illustrate the audibility.I read the comments in between. I'll bite. What ever the instrument produced, if it is picked up via mics with sufficiently small added distortions is what you would have heard there, at the original sound venue.
I take it that you really do not understand pipe organs. I'll add a little bit of information that may clarify some of the comments.
Pipe Organs have flue pipes, basically flutes, and reed pipes. They are more like a saxophone, or clarinet, Oboe, Bassoon.
The better organs use full length resonator pipes on top of the reeds. As in the pipe the metal reed is playing into is the full half wavelength of the note. This gives as much gravitas to the tone as is possible. There are many reeds stops that do not have full length resonators, and there are strong beat frequencies and weak fundamental or actual desired note played frequency.
Almost every note on a pipe organ is multifaceted, as in contains a multitude of harmonics.
Even a straight principal, diapason, flute etc has harmonic content.
Mark
What a great post! I fully agree higher xo for full chest punch is what you want at higher spl. After lots of thinking this is why i went and got me 2 Skram subwoofers that are designed to do flat between 28 and 140hz. For my thing ive settled at 98 but you are so right. Get a sub that performs well over 100hz if you want loud chest punch, and leave the nice main speakers how big they are, at as high you can high pass them as possible.I just finished building one of these monsters because I was frustrated with my modern "too small enclosure" subs https://shop.gsgad.com/collections/...ies/products/roundover-full-marty-single-unit . Compared to my 2 SVS SB-3000 this one sub puts out more SPL with about 30dB less distortion and about 80 ms less group delay at 20 Hz and plays flat and clean to about 15 Hz. These giant subs don't just play low, if you put a "pro" driver in them they will play clean to over 500 Hz with huge SPL. Between 40 Hz and 120 Hz is where "slam" lives and neither the small subs nor smaller mains speakers do as good a job as you would think with this range at high SPL. All in all for low volume listening it doesn't make much difference (see fletcher munson curve) but if you listen loud, high SPL clean bass with extension is a real treat and I am starting to think that the "modern" approach of small enclosures with big drivers and lots of x-max may not be the way to go.
My advice is don't just look at SPL at 20 Hz. Some modern subs have over 100 ms group delay at 20 Hz which does not sound good but more importantly it makes integration really hard. Same with distortion, the common wisdom is we are less sensitive to distortion at low frequencies which is true but a lot of subs have distortion over 30% and some approaching 100% and less sensitive does not mean distortion doesn't matter. Finally be aware that again because of the"fletcher munson curve" LF, even at 90 dB, does not sound "loud". So while it seems crazy to want over 100 dB at 20 Hz it really isn't that loud even though it is hard to achieve. Have fun.