• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Subwoofer Comparison

OP
sweetchaos

sweetchaos

Major Contributor
The Curator
Joined
Nov 29, 2019
Messages
3,872
Likes
11,546
Location
BC, Canada
Silly question:My current sub is from 2006 but the main specs are:
Frequency response 30–200 Hz
(at maximum crossover frequency)
Crossover frequency 50–200 Hz (variable)
Maximum output power 150 W Dynamic
20 cm woofer

Some of the new subs today seem to be the same or slightly less on some of these specs eg the Klipsch R-8SW which has a FREQUENCY RESPONSE 38Hz-120Hz +/-3dB
150W max dynamic output, same size woofer
Both are down firing

Is the Klispch a better performer simply because of the brand and/or because its newer even though the specs are no better?
There's so many aspects of a subwoofer design (total amplifier power, amplifier's distortion handling, woofer size, woofer's excursion handling, cabinet size, cabinet damping, electronics, etc).
Without measuring both subs using the CEA-2010-A standard, we can't say for sure whether the newer Klipsch is a better performer than your old sub.
You can't assume that because one subwoofer is a newer design that it's automatically a better performer.
We need to test both subs, ideally.

Also, reading manufacturer's website for information like 'peak power' or 'frequency response' is meaningless. Since we don't know what these values mean, practically, it's useless information.
The only useful information you can get from a manufacturer's website is the size of the woofer, whether the design is ported/sealed, and cabinet size (volume).
Which gives you an indication of their output capabilities (peak output and how low the extension is).

The only true test of a subwoofer's performance is the CEA-2010-A since there's no way for a subwoofer to cheat this test. If there's not enough output for a given frequency, that's it. You can't make a 8" sub outperform a competently-designed 12" sub.
As they say "There's no replacement for displacement", which means woofer size is an indicator of performance.
But of course, not all brands are created equal. Certain subwoofer companies maximize performance for your dollar, while others overcharge you. And most subwoofers are just awful.

My spreadsheet allows you to find out how good Klipsch subs are (tip: they're not very good), but more importantly find better performing subs, so you're not wasting your money.
 

warthor

Active Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
125
Likes
72
Monolith is having a sale this weekend, and the sale includes items that are already marked down. If I had to choose between 1x 16" Subwoofer or 2 x dual 10" inch subwoofers which would you select? My home theater is in an a normal living room, which is open concept. The reason I mention both of those subwoofers is that they are on a great sale, and 2 of the M-210s cost the same as one 16" subwoofer (it is a fair battle in that sense). I don't really think in terms of price these options can be beat.



(using code "smore" you get 15% off)
 

elmura

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2020
Messages
10
Likes
11
I have some non conforming advice on the matter of multiple subwoofers for the average Joe...
Adding a second or 3rd subwoofer does not automatically resolve peaks and nulls. Adding additional subwoofers actually complicates getting a smooth frequency response, not simplifying it.
To get a smooth response with multiple subwoofers requires much experimenting with placement, phase, crossover and potentially EQ of each sub whilst measuring the response at each listening position with a tripod mounted mic and software like REW.
The general guidelines for multiple subs are OK as a starting point, but the reality is that each room is different. Not only in dimensions, but seating position, furnishings, plus main speaker location & response.
It's a tough gig to smooth out peaks and nulls for all listeners.
On the positive side: one of the biggest benefits of multiple subs is the reduction in distortion when playing at high SPL since each sub does not have to output as much sound power to achieve the same average SPL since the load is shared between them.
 

sonitus mirus

Active Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2021
Messages
256
Likes
336
I have some non conforming advice on the matter of multiple subwoofers for the average Joe...
Adding a second or 3rd subwoofer does not automatically resolve peaks and nulls. Adding additional subwoofers actually complicates getting a smooth frequency response, not simplifying it.
To get a smooth response with multiple subwoofers requires much experimenting with placement, phase, crossover and potentially EQ of each sub whilst measuring the response at each listening position with a tripod mounted mic and software like REW.
The general guidelines for multiple subs are OK as a starting point, but the reality is that each room is different. Not only in dimensions, but seating position, furnishings, plus main speaker location & response.
It's a tough gig to smooth out peaks and nulls for all listeners.
On the positive side: one of the biggest benefits of multiple subs is the reduction in distortion when playing at high SPL since each sub does not have to output as much sound power to achieve the same average SPL since the load is shared between them.

Yes, in my smaller room, a single subwoofer was able to sit in a corner and significantly reduce a null from my tower speakers' reflections. My sound absorption helped with highs and upper-mids, but DSP and absorption were not an option to tame the bass nulls. I honestly am unable to hear the sub directionally, and I would only know it was working and not part of the stereo speaker's sound if I turn off the front tower speakers.

This setup is in an office room where I work, and the music is mostly background listening with an occasional volume increase to jam for a bit. For cranking the volume to 11 and dancing around like Tom Cruise in Risky Business, I leave that for my living room.
 
OP
sweetchaos

sweetchaos

Major Contributor
The Curator
Joined
Nov 29, 2019
Messages
3,872
Likes
11,546
Location
BC, Canada
Looks like Audioholics published CEA-2010 data for REL HT/1510 Predator II
Video review coming up in a few hours:

This is a US$1900 15" sealed subwoofer, and has a rating of "Large".

Thoughts:
We can finally definitively say that REL subs are mediocre performers and completely overpriced against the competitors.
Something we (the community) already suspected for a long time, but it's nice to see confirmation with CEA-2010 data.
In other words, there's dozens of better-performing subs for your money.
 

stoneeh

Member
Joined
May 17, 2020
Messages
14
Likes
48
NOT CEA-2010, but I feel like it doesn't hurt mentioning: I measured the Max. SPL of about a dozen (DIY and commercial) PA subwoofers last year and published the results on my Youtube channel. Method is THD limit with sine burst signal, measured with ARTA / STEPS; GPM; environment outdoor. All other details are in the video description.

Turn the music off and/or pause the video and scroll through with the arrow keys of your keyboard if you're just interested in the data without distraction. Enjoy.

 

AJM1981

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2022
Messages
33
Likes
12
Useful spreadsheet to some I guess, not bad!

When I get a subwoofer I mainly try to get one that connects well in bass extension for music and goes pretty deep.

It might seem obvious that there is plenty of choice in subs, but the lack of options in frequency covering and settings within the criteria 'and' availability within the EU is a fact unfortunately. Most subwoofers up to a certain price point seem to be more like what a woofer does for a floorstander and thus not really excel in the "sub department" .

I eventually got the great B&W Asw608 to support my Evo 4.2s. For my second set of Denton 85th I found my second choice Polk in a lower price range that didn't go as deep, but still provided a reasonable extension. All other options didnt go as deep, didnt have the right cut off point or had weird quirks (like a review mentioning one to shut down on standby when the volume was below a certain point)

For everyone living in Australia and the UK. Wharfedale has a great looking and praised budget sub (sw-150) on those markets that goes deep with excellent reviews and plenty of settings. It was my first choice and I have tried all possible ways within reasonable price tags to get one to my hometown, but it turned out not to be possible within reasonable pricing and conditions. :)
 

delta76

Major Contributor
Joined
Nov 27, 2021
Messages
1,613
Likes
2,452
Thoughts:
We can finally definitively say that REL subs are mediocre performers and completely overpriced against the competitors.
Something we (the community) already suspected for a long time, but it's nice to see confirmation with CEA-2010 data.
In other words, there's dozens of better-performing subs for your money.
and yet there are still horde of people swear by REL. REL is for music, SVS is for movie :facepalm:
 

Willem

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
3,654
Likes
5,276
The only true test of a subwoofer's performance is the CEA-2010-A
I agree that it is an important test. However, it operates at the extremes of a sub's performance, i.e. it indicates how loud it can play particular frequencies at the maximum distortion that the norm deems acceptable. It does not tell us anything about the sound quality/distorton within that envelope. Does that matter? I don't know.
 

Sancus

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 30, 2018
Messages
2,923
Likes
7,616
Location
Canada
I agree that it is an important test. However, it operates at the extremes of a sub's performance, i.e. it indicates how loud it can play particular frequencies at the maximum distortion that the norm deems acceptable. It does not tell us anything about the sound quality/distorton within that envelope. Does that matter? I don't know.
TBH I haven't seen any complaints that distortion at moderate levels is audible with most well-designed and built subs. The way CEA2010 is performed, it's pretty easy to collect that data if you are already doing that work. For example Data Bass always showed THD at fixed levels well below the threshold. If you look up the SVS PB12, you'll see that at 100dB it's at single digit %s from 20hz on up. Same with the SVS SB12, which is below 5% from 30hz+, but struggles a bit below that as you would expect from a small, sealed 12" sub.

Port noise sometimes CAN be an issue with very cheap ported subs even below the limits, but that's usually noticed by good reviewers, for example Erin always talks about how much port noise there is.

Overall I don't think distortion at moderate levels is a widespread problem with subs, but it certainly might be an issue with the odd one.
 

3125b

Major Contributor
Joined
May 18, 2020
Messages
1,352
Likes
2,204
Location
Germany
I find myself looking at subs again - this time to actually buy one (or two).
Went for a Denon X2700 with a pair of KEF R5 for my living room setup (got a good deal).
Now those small KEFs will require a sub. I'm not looking for party-level SPL, just something decent for music and movies in a flat. The room isn't particularly challenging, 25m² (270ft²) and almost square.
Don't want to break the bank, but a couple bucks either direction don't matter.

I kind of like the Arendal 1963 1S. It's not that cheap at 899€, but plays down to 19Hz (-3dB) at more than reasonable levels, is compact (width being most importent, only 31,5cm) and not aggressively ugly.

An other option would be one or two cheaper subs, maybe Nubert XW-700 at 495€/each it plays down to 26Hz (-3dB) and is also DSP-corrected (offer room correction too, but I don't need that).

Any advice, I don't know which way to go. Thx.
 

nat1

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2020
Messages
50
Likes
44
Thoughts:
We can finally definitively say that REL subs are mediocre performers and completely overpriced against the competitors.
Something we (the community) already suspected for a long time, but it's nice to see confirmation with CEA-2010 data.
In other words, there's dozens of better-performing subs for your money.
Doesn't look like that bad of value for the UK and probably EU. For sealed there's the PSA S1512 and what else? The ported Monolith 15 Ultra is on sale right now which you can use in sealed mode but it's also significantly larger.

SVS value isn't exactly great here either. The SB4000 costs £2000.
 

3125b

Major Contributor
Joined
May 18, 2020
Messages
1,352
Likes
2,204
Location
Germany
The Monolith 13 THX Ultra is 1180€ at the moment and it's in a whole different league frankly.
The 12" that I got is still comparably powerful (10dB higher SPL at 20Hz with half the distortion and 3dB lower SPL at 40Hz, but again less than half the distortion) and 690€.
From the reviews I've seen so far sealed really only means higher distortion in the lowest frequencies, I don't get the appeal of that.
 

Feyire

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2019
Messages
272
Likes
314
Location
Netherlands
The Monolith 13 THX Ultra is 1180€ at the moment and it's in a whole different league frankly.
The 12" that I got is still comparably powerful (10dB higher SPL at 20Hz with half the distortion and 3dB lower SPL at 40Hz, but again less than half the distortion) and 690€.
From the reviews I've seen so far sealed really only means higher distortion in the lowest frequencies, I don't get the appeal of that.
..or dual Monolith V2 10" (€559.99 x 2 - sale price) for about the same price as one Monolith 13.
 

srrxr71

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 4, 2020
Messages
1,581
Likes
1,243
The lower the bass goes, the more of it I want. I feel kind of sad when I don't get a clean 20Hz for music.

Side note. Barely related to the discussion.

Nice going @sweetchaos
Fair enough. In some other thread we were discussing where these tones come from.

Someone pointed out a piano can go as low as 29Hz but rarely played there.

Someone else mentioned intermodulation is the source of these sub 29Hz tones.

I offered a question about the presence of “undertones” where do these frequencies come from?
 

OzarkCDN

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2022
Messages
30
Likes
5
Amazing, op! What a ton of work you've done - certainly helps collate the bits and bobs of disenfranchised spreadsheets I've found trying to research a sub for my room. So, I've read that multiple subs generally help to even response out in a room, but if I am looking at your sheet for my 5600 ft^3 room, I should be looking at a single 'extreme' sub. If multiples add to the total output, is there an easy way to generalize the possibility of reducing the sub size? ie, if I need a single 'Extreme', is it reasonable to use two 'Large'?
 

nat1

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2020
Messages
50
Likes
44
The Monolith 13 THX Ultra is 1180€ at the moment and it's in a whole different league frankly.
The 12" that I got is still comparably powerful (10dB higher SPL at 20Hz with half the distortion and 3dB lower SPL at 40Hz, but again less than half the distortion) and 690€.
From the reviews I've seen so far sealed really only means higher distortion in the lowest frequencies, I don't get the appeal of that.

Way to miss the point entirely. The 13 Ultra is almost twice the size of the REL. Nobody here is arguing that ported isn't better for performance. There simply isn't many options for the size class in the UK/EU market.
 
Top Bottom