I think from memory they are Conrad Johnson Premier 12 tube mono blocks. Perhaps @MattHooper can clarify this for us and give us the model number?Which one is that? I'd like to know.
-
WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required as is 20 years of participation in forums (not all true). There are daily reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
Stereophile's Jim Austin disagrees w Atkinson; says tubes have something that can't be measured
- Thread starter teched58
- Start date
computer-audiophile
Major Contributor
I do not know the Conrad Johnson, but for many years I prefer only SET anyway today. My last more push-pull amps were the ELV 100 (picture) about 20 years ago and a Line Magnetic LM-211IA until last year. Both I found sonically boring. No trace of the sonic charm of a tube. In comparison with these I prefer then my Yamaha SS amps.
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2016
- Messages
- 19,093
- Likes
- 34,006
That is the weird and inconsistent part. I've never heard an SET that didn't create a caricature of sound of the source recording. I've listened to push-pull triodes and liked them despite their shortcomings. I'm not trying to insult anyone's opinion on what they like, just describing that it varies.I do not know the Conrad Johnson, but for many years I prefer only SET anyway today. My last more push-pull amps were the ELV 100 (picture) about 20 years ago and a Line Magnetic LM-211IA until last year. Both I found sonically boring. No trace of the sonic charm of a tube. In comparison with these I prefer then my Yamaha SS amps.
Here is a rather traditional tube power amp that has better measurements. Even it has too much FR variation. Otherwise it is pretty clean. McIntosh did have somewhat different transformers.
JSmith
Major Contributor
Tube amps used to be good measuring, back in the day. It's only lately we've realized they should really be distortion boxes.
Good to hear. I like them.
computer-audiophile
Major Contributor
If you were my neighbor, I'd say you can come over and we'll listen and chat a bit. Provided you like classical music.
I've always had a lot of fun and a sense of accomplishment at meetings like this.
The McIntosh amp always reminds me a bit of Harley Davidson in appearance. I can't make friends with that.
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2016
- Messages
- 19,093
- Likes
- 34,006
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2016
- Messages
- 19,093
- Likes
- 34,006
I do like classical and would gladly come listen if we were close enough.
They probably don't say Voldemort's name either...
They are threatened by us, and have nowhere to hide. If they get upset about being called out for writing nonsense, maybe they should stop writing nonsense.
computer-audiophile
Major Contributor
I did not have an OTL yet. I also didn't want one because I had noticed that they can become unstable and shoot down the speakers. I will exclude Atmasphere, from which I have not yet heard something like that.
ribonucleic
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2023
- Messages
- 214
- Likes
- 221
Well, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I wouldn't let it in the house
I rank it in the middle of the third quartile of visual attractiveness for tube amps.
Not competitive, as our host would say.
My experience with audible vacuum tube microphonics are that they are usually high Q, resonating for a few relatively narrow frequency band stimuli.
While that is arguably reverb, it does not sound like conventional reverb effects.
FWIW, frequency dependent crosstalk in some tube systems can be capacitive coupling, e.g. when a single 12AX7 is used for both channels.
Yes. Decent sound, still not super-low output impedance so load-sensitive, pretty much every amp was a little different, and reliability was not spectacular. As others have said, the torch-bearer for OTL tube amps today is Atmas-Sphere AFAIK and Ralph @atmasphere is a member here.
I built a couple of OTL tube amps but did not have much success. The last had an auto bias circuit and output DC servo loop to maintain 0 V DC at the output all using op-amp based circuits. I was really proud of that, then it all blew up when an output tube arced and I discovered I did not have quite enough in the way of protection for the op amps (there's always another path to destruction).
Last edited:
All-time famous test. Many in this thread should read, would save 18 or more pages of nonsense...
Yes, back in the day, with KLH model 9s, which I very much wanted to own.
I preferred those KLH speakers with other amplifiers in dealers' listening rooms,
but passed on the challenges of owning them.
FWIW, OTL amplifiers are inherently asymmetric; positive excursions to speakers will mismatch negatives, at least for source impedance,
even with carefully matched vacuum tubes, which do not stay matched with any amount of aging.
Non-trivial source impedances typically allow different loudspeakers to sound even more different.
