OH MY, I hope you didn't film that at your house ???A cornered rat may act desperately (as last resort)
![]()
OH MY, I hope you didn't film that at your house ???A cornered rat may act desperately (as last resort)
![]()
I wouldn't be surprised if it actually cost AQ in the low 3 figures per meter of cable... even though they don't do anything to the sound, they do incorporate a lot of high-quality raw materials, and I assume they are low-volume hand-built, so higher unit costs again.More like $50 or even less.
I suppose it was filmed in New York (judging by size)I hope you didn't film that at your house ???
I would be surprised…I wouldn't be surprised if it actually cost AQ in the low 3 figures per meter of cable... even though they don't do anything to the sound, they do incorporate a lot of high-quality raw materials, and I assume they are low-volume hand-built, so higher unit costs again.
It really depends on how much inventory they carry and place at dealers / distributors at any one time, what their margins are, and whether they do any serious cost control.I would be surprised…
We’ll likely never know, but if they are not using 3rd party connectors, then the basic ingredients are likely less than labour, marketing etc.It really depends on how much inventory they carry and place at dealers / distributors at any one time, what their margins are, and whether they do any serious cost control.
Or let me put it this way, at $10K+ per meter, their biggest expense is always going to be dealer margin. Their margins don't swing that much if the cord costs $50 or $500 per meter to build. So the incentive to reduce cost is smaller than it is with most manufacturers. As such, they could be manufacturing in really inefficient ways and still make good money.
It's hard to say if the volumes are high enough and whether the owners care enough to pursue cost reduction. That costs money in its own way, since you have to pay for bigger production runs, sink more cash into inventory, sometimes even take out loans to cover it, risk loss of inventory at different points in the chain, etc.
You could definitely spend $100+ to put together a length of AQ cable, I'm basically wondering if they bother figuring out how to pay less.
There’s a whole top of page article on why cables matter: https://www.stereophile.com/content/colloms-cables
It’s worth a read just to witness the mental gymnastics at play.
I can only speak to mainstream or low-end cables, but you do need to pay extra (mostly for labor) in the construction of high-quality cables.We’ll likely never know, but if they are not using 3rd party connectors, then the basic ingredients are likely less than labour, marketing etc.
But then again, I know nothing of cable industry.
When he started talking about purified copper sounding better, I tapped out.This podcast is pretty good IMHO.
But then maybe it won't turn green inside the insulation the way much early Monster speaker cable did??? LOLWhen he started talking about purified copper sounding better, I tapped out.
That is a special feature to mirror people being green with envy.But then maybe it won't turn green inside the insulation the way much early Monster speaker cable did??? LOL
What, no inky blacks?No surprise: the QNet7 delivered tighter bass, more depth, more transparency, and a smoother top than a standard TP-Link switch.
Good god. Reading just the first two paragraphs of that was torture.Just as I replaced all the cabling, more harsh news:
![]()
Fezz Equinox D/A processor
It wasn't long ago that bottom-shelf DACs had this dry, gray, punchy, grainy sound, emerging from a weird mechanical clarity. Their sound reminded me of cheap whisky. The ones that didn't sound like $1 shots replaced the dry grain with some blurry gel. No vitality. No subtle contrasts. No...www.stereophile.com
For some reason I read the whole thing and was stunned by the amount of non-stop nonsense which apparently passes for subjective reviews. Only one sentence in the entire review made any sense to me and it was the last one in the "measurements" section.Good god. Reading just the first two paragraphs of that was torture.
Could not read it all, too much... I'd have to throw out all my digital equipment, Topping; Focusrite - heck, Alesis; Oberheim and so on...Good god. Reading just the first two paragraphs of that was torture.
Just by reading only the quote in your posting, I immediately recognized the author! Only our Herbie could have written something like that.Just as I replaced all the cabling, more harsh news:
![]()
Fezz Equinox D/A processor
It wasn't long ago that bottom-shelf DACs had this dry, gray, punchy, grainy sound, emerging from a weird mechanical clarity. Their sound reminded me of cheap whisky. The ones that didn't sound like $1 shots replaced the dry grain with some blurry gel. No vitality. No subtle contrasts. No...www.stereophile.com
Just by reading only the quote in your posting, I immediately recognized the author! Only our Herbie could have written something like that.
By his own admission, in numerous articles, he knows his substances and I suspect that is driving his imagination to go wild!
He also writes about cables and if I remember correctly, he is also distributing/selling some cables. Take the second part of the statement with a grain of salt, it may be not current, at my age, memories are fading rapidly....
Using those dCS converters convinced me that, in contrast to analog masters, where someone can just play back the tape, no one really knows, or can show me, what's actually in a digital file. But that doesn't stop me from wondering, what should this CD sound like? What did the producers hear? Followed by, how can I know when a DAC is telling the truth?