olds1959special
Major Contributor
Is it okay to place identical subs next to each speaker, one fed the L and one fed the R for stereo bass?
Except for this album, that has two bass players panned left and right! Although low bass is not supposed to be locatable, I can feel where the bass output from each sub is coming from, so having one by each speaker seems to create a more balanced image, and the potential for stereo sub bass, which this record definitely has.You could, might not be best placement for subs, nor is there a lot of "stereo" in frequencies that low....
Only self appointed major luminaries allowed!Stereo bass is far from settled science, there is a facinating thread that covers stereo bass and many other speaker subjects by the leading scientists in the field. The "safest" strategy is to preserve stereo bass ... if it is there you get the sonic benifts, if the recording monos the bass it make no difference.
The reason the subject is so contrversial is that it calls into question a lot of audio dogma especially when it comes to sub woofer integration strategies. The thread is long but is one of the best on the site.
'A Broad Discussion of Speakers with Major Audio Luminaries' https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...f-speakers-with-major-audio-luminaries.62951/
Setting speakers/subs up for one album? Might have to check this one out, tho. Good luck!Except for this album, that has two bass players panned left and right! Although low bass is not supposed to be locatable, I can feel where the bass output from each sub is coming from, so having one by each speaker seems to create a more balanced image, and the potential for stereo sub bass, which this record definitely has.View attachment 473979
The thread is this one:Stereo bass is far from settled science, there is a facinating thread that covers stereo bass and many other speaker subjects by the leading scientists in the field. The "safest" strategy is to preserve stereo bass ... if it is there you get the sonic benifts, if the recording monos the bass it make no difference.
The reason the subject is so contrversial is that it calls into question a lot of audio dogma especially when it comes to sub woofer integration strategies. The thread is long but is one of the best on the site.
'A Broad Discussion of Speakers with Major Audio Luminaries' https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...f-speakers-with-major-audio-luminaries.62951/
A quick FYI on that... they're most certainly not self appointed and have all well and truly earned such status.self appointed major luminaries
I'm pretty sure if you did some blind/double blind comparisons in your room playing that album, you'd be surprised how much of the localization was due to harmonics and not the lowest fundamentals. That said, I run a similar configuration to yours in my 2 channel room and it "just sounds right".The “Double Bass” recording is proof stereo bass exists! Also I read about Dr. David Griesinger, engineer at Lexicon, who is a proponent of stereo bass. When I listen to this recording, I feel like the second subwoofer adds a whole new dimension of space to the music, and everything is symmetrical now. I can’t understand why they say bass isn’t localizable below 80 Hz because it seems to be for me, even though my LPF’s are set to much lower than that, more like 45 Hz. Here’s a picture showing what my setup looks like!
Except for this album, that has two bass players panned left and right!
Although low bass is not supposed to be locatable, I can feel where the bass output from each sub is coming from
I’m not sure I agree. I am listening to other albums with the bass panned to one side and I feel I can locate the sub bass, the sound coming from each sub, just fine, and this adds to the overall sense of dimension in the music.I love that album!
Feel?
In my experience, given that:
- the room is small (i.e. a normal home listening room, not a performance venue)
- the subwoofers are low-passed and don't get the full-range signal
you will not be able to locate the low frequency source from the listening position, even if it is mixed to one or the other stereo channel. If you do, then the subwoofers likely emit higher frequency distortions, like port chuffing or harmonics produced by the subs themselves or by interaction with nearby objects. Even in that case, the detectability of the subwoofers doesn't interfere with the perception of the stereo image produced by the main speakers.
It is possible to mix bass signals with varying phase between the channels, so that the bass is perceived as "moving around". I've heard this in a Billie Eilish album. This is 100% post-processing trickery and doesn't occur in acoustical recordings. You will not get that effect with mono bass.
In my opinion, the ability to smooth out bass response through placement of multiple mono subwoofers in a room far outweighs the downside of not getting the Billie Eilish effect. YMMV.
So you are using high level connections with your speakers/subs?I’m not sure I agree. I am listening to other albums with the bass panned to one side and I feel I can locate the sub bass, the sound coming from each sub, just fine.
He was the lead scientist at Lexicon. He has a youtube talk about the low frequency envelopment and spaciousness that can come from stereo bass along with numerous papers about it on his site.The “Double Bass” recording is proof stereo bass exists! Also I read about Dr. David Griesinger, engineer at Lexicon, who is a proponent of stereo bass. When I listen to this recording, I feel like the second subwoofer adds a whole new dimension of space to the music, and everything is symmetrical now. I can’t understand why they say bass isn’t localizable below 80 Hz because it seems to be for me, even though my LPF’s are set to much lower than that, more like 45 Hz. Here’s a picture showing what my setup looks like!