• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Stereo Sub Vs Dual Mono

i fail to understand, how the spatial sensation can be objectively measured

does this refer to the reverberation?
 
At some point, it can be fun with some practical tests so that people can listen for themselves and come to their own conclusions. :)

For this test to work, you must have at least two subwoofers set up in a stereo configuration.


I created a 30-second long audio track of pink noise that has a low-pass filter at 60 Hz with a roll-off slope of 12 dB/octave.
  1. The first 6 seconds of the track is the left channel playing alone.
  2. The next 6 seconds (6-12s) are both channels playing together but reduced by 3 dB to get the level matched.
  3. The next 6 seconds (12-18s) is the right channel playing alone.
  4. The next 6 seconds (18-24s) is back to both channels playing together, yet again with a reduced level by 3 dB (this part is the same as #2)
  5. The last 6 seconds (24-30s) are both channels playing together. But this time the left channel is delayed by 35 ms and the right channel is increased by 3 dB to somewhat simulate a stereo recording of the bass sound coming from a place closer to the right channel.
Here is the sound clip: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a4ike3s1s1bwmp7/Bass L, L+R, R, L+R, L (35ms delay)+R.wav?dl=0



And this is what I hear:

1. I can clearly hear the sound coming from the left side of my room for the first 6 seconds.
2. For the next 6 seconds the sound shifts to a central point right in front of me.
3. Now the sound clearly shifts to the right side of the room.
4. The sound is now back to the central point right in front of me.
5. And this is where the interesting things happen and what I think David Griesinger is talking about. The bass sound is no longer clearly heard from a central point right in front of me, instead, now it has a more enveloping characteristic that fills my listening room in a completely different way.

To me, it's pretty clear that low-frequency content recorded in stereo, and reproduced with at least two subwoofers in a stereo configuration can add envelopment to the overall sound.
I was DREAMING for such a test file,I was planning to do it myself,thank you!
 
It proves that subwoofers set up in stereo configuration can add to the spatial sensation, which subwoofers set up in mono can never do.

When it comes to what stereo adds to the equation for the low end, it got very little to do with "if we can hear the directional cues of these low frequencies or not", what is making the difference is the phase differences that occur in the room when at least two subwoofers are playing separate things, which in turn will add to a more enveloping sound in the listening room.

This doesn't mean higher frequencies don't add to the spatial sensation as well, but that is a discussion for another thread.

I don't understand how it proves anything until you compare it to the alternative? The thread title is explicitly stereo sub vs dual mono. It's not surprising that you can hear where pink noise low passed at 60hz with a 12db/octave filter is coming from, or that the delayed signal sounds different.
 
I don't know how that could be measured if you don't want to use your built-in measuring devices, also known as your ears. :)
Ears are not measuring devices! You are talking about a subjective phenomena, which differs from person to person, hence there can be no agreement.
 
Ears are not measuring devices! You are talking about a subjective phenomena, which differs from person to person, hence there can be no agreement.
The above test file is beyond agreement or not,the effect is as audible as it gets even with the mains deactivated.
 
The above test file is beyond agreement or not,the effect is as audible as it gets even with the mains deactivated.
Yeah, one could make a point about the crossover filter not being steep enough to avoid higher frequencies to spill into known audible territory though.
 
i fail to understand, how the spatial sensation can be objectively measured

does this refer to the reverberation?
I'd think one would measure it the same way as soundstage, imaging, or any other stereo phenomenon... which is to say I don't think you can. Stereo is an illusion, and I've not heard of any way to measure aspects of that illusion objectively.
 
The above test file is beyond agreement or not,the effect is as audible as it gets even with the mains deactivated.
I listened track one on Apple Music, hi-res/lossless.


I first used my standard setup, two subs fed with mono signal then switched to stereo subs and I can’t hear any difference. In both cases the crossover was 80Hz LR4. The subs are placed outside of the mains, at the corners and are placed on the same wall as the mains.

You must either have a special ability to detect the difference or your brain is fooling you, which is most likely case. You may check my bio to see if I’m classed as a person who has good experience in hearing differences in sound reproduction.
 
I don't understand how it proves anything until you compare it to the alternative? The thread title is explicitly stereo sub vs dual mono. It's not surprising that you can hear where pink noise low passed at 60hz with a 12db/octave filter is coming from, or that the delayed signal sounds different.

You have your mono test in the test file I provided. From 6 to 12 seconds, and from 18 to 24 seconds you have identical signals going to both channels, that is mono.

The aim of this test is to isolate what is happening in the low end in particular, you can argue that the effect of this may be masked when a complete recording of a song is played, that will depend on a lot of different factors.

I suspect that I will never be able to make a test file you will approve. :)
 
You have your mono test in the test file I provided. From 6 to 12 seconds, and from 18 to 24 seconds you have identical signals going to both channels, that is mono.

The aim of this test is to isolate what is happening in the low end in particular, you can argue that the effect of this may be masked when a complete recording of a song is played, that will depend on a lot of different factors.

I suspect that I will never be able to make a test file you will approve. :)
Please submit that test file again. I can’t find it on the thread.
 
i fail to understand, how the spatial sensation can be objectively measured

does this refer to the reverberation?
Dr Griesinger has proposed a metric for envelopment which he called DFT (diffuse field transfer function) and the method to measure/calculate it. A summary of the method is given below.

griesinger_1.png
 
Last edited:
I listened track one on Apple Music, hi-res/lossless.


I first used my standard setup, two subs fed with mono signal then switched to stereo subs and I can’t hear any difference. In both cases the crossover was 80Hz LR4. The subs are placed outside of the mains, at the corners and are placed on the same wall as the mains.

You must either have a special ability to detect the difference or your brain is fooling you, which is most likely case. You may check my bio to see if I’m classed as a person who has good experience in hearing differences in sound reproduction.
No,no,I'm talking about that were difference is debetable,I'm talking about the one @goat76 posted.

(at least I hope you enjoyed the great perfomance!)
 
Dr Griesinger has proposed a metric for envelopment which he called DFT (diffused field transfer function) and the method to measure/calculate it. A summary of the method is given below.

View attachment 279413
Have you read the paper and how the metric is calculated? And saw the number of assumptions he made? And have you wondered why there had been no interest to develop a device to measure the metric?

Just because a paper exists doesn’t mean it can be related in the real world.
 
No,no,I'm talking about that were difference is debetable,I'm talking about the one @goat76 posted.

(at least I hope you enjoyed the great perfomance!)
I did ask to point to what is pointed.
 
I did ask to point to what is pointed.
Here (in the middle of the post)

 
You have your mono test in the test file I provided. From 6 to 12 seconds, and from 18 to 24 seconds you have identical signals going to both channels, that is mono.

The aim of this test is to isolate what is happening in the low end in particular, you can argue that the effect of this may be masked when a complete recording of a song is played, that will depend on a lot of different factors.

I suspect that I will never be able to make a test file you will approve. :)

There's nothing wrong with the test file, and I'm not debating if you can recognize channel differences and/or spatial cues in a recording with stereo subs. I'm positive that you can. What I'm saying is that in my experience this effect is not diminished when you switch to dual mono.
 
Have you read the paper and how the metric is calculated? And saw the number of assumptions he made? And have you wondered why there had been no interest to develop a device to measure the metric?

Just because a paper exists doesn’t mean it can be related in the real world.
Some other member has a question as to how spatial sensation can be measured, and I provided an answer. You have a problem with that?
 
Back
Top Bottom