On the preference ratings, what is the standard deviation in those measurements?
From my background in Laboratory Technology, a blood sugar reported as 100 mg/dl with a procedural SD of +\- 3 mg/dl could have an actual value of between 97 and 103 that is perfectly acceptable precision.
Just curious… I would hazard that the SD in electronic measurements are much more precise than biochemical reaction measurements. Sort of like measuring the length of a one inch wooden dowel with a yardstick or a precision micrometer. When I started working in a hospital laboratory in the 1950s, one method used a visual color comparison with a calibrated (well, sort of) glass standard with the color chemical reaction of the patient sample in a glass tube. For sugar analysis with that method, an SD of 10 or 15 was pretty good. Imagine the variables in a human differentiating color, much less the entirely manual pipetting of blood and reagents!
From my background in Laboratory Technology, a blood sugar reported as 100 mg/dl with a procedural SD of +\- 3 mg/dl could have an actual value of between 97 and 103 that is perfectly acceptable precision.
Just curious… I would hazard that the SD in electronic measurements are much more precise than biochemical reaction measurements. Sort of like measuring the length of a one inch wooden dowel with a yardstick or a precision micrometer. When I started working in a hospital laboratory in the 1950s, one method used a visual color comparison with a calibrated (well, sort of) glass standard with the color chemical reaction of the patient sample in a glass tube. For sugar analysis with that method, an SD of 10 or 15 was pretty good. Imagine the variables in a human differentiating color, much less the entirely manual pipetting of blood and reagents!