Someone said they were eating popcorn yesterday so with an expecting audience perhaps things tend to get a little more, shall I say, "cinematic" than what is absolutely strictly necessary. I still stand by the things I said. Sorry to the popcorn people. What happened that was likely the peak of my performance and ambition on tape. The rest of my efforts will merely be an attempt to get a genuine response from someone who actually has the ability to answer the questions I am asking, which put as plainly and simply as possible is this:
1. Given a driver similar to the ts-b400pro which has a 500w nominal 200w RMS rating and 106dB sensitivity, would I hear the difference between a benchmark AHB2(A/B) or a NCx500(D) at any frequency, but especially at the ever so critical 10kHz-20kHz range at ANY volume level and distance? Does the answer change at a 108dB tweeter because I found one and may buy it?
2. What is the THD+N of hearing? Where does it begin? An article or thread would be appreciated. I searched on the forum quickly and didn't see anything that jumped out at me. There may be a specific wording I'm not considering to find this.
3. It should be stated again: I don't care if two speakers sound more different than two amplifiers, I care if two amplifiers sound different. You are insulting your own intelligence to say anything more about speakers. Maybe some of you don't have a clue about what it means to be respectable. Don't ask God or Allah or the infinite void to save you if that's the case. A future with increasing dangerous technology is going to be increasingly unforgiving to the careless idiots. I know people who have died hitting moose on the highway and it's usually people the world is better off without but hey who's to say how things work. Some part of me doubts that the patience exists to keep each any every one of the 8 billion people on the planet around forever.
The graphs paint a picture that class D amplifiers are worse at high frequencies. Does the THD+N from 15kHz to 20kHz increase linearly? exponentially? The AHB2 goes from -102dB to -93dB to the graph from 5kHz to 15kHz respectively. Heck who knows how much worse it is at 20kHz and it seems ridiculous not to put that line on the plot considering that music is defined as spanning from 20Hz to 20kHz, not 20Hz to 15kHz. There's room for it. The NCX goes from -96 to -90 to -80 at respectively, and who knows if 20kHz would be -70 or -60 considering the trend. The 32 tone graphs are at 5 watts that's not telling me enough I don't listen at a constant 5 watts lol. Not knocking Amirm at all, huge respect to him. I would have wasted a lot of money already probably if not for this website. It is GREATLY appreciated. Very greatly. I cant emphasize that enough. I want to contribute somehow whether its with an amplifier that hasn't been tested or in some other way eventually. Although 4D graphs(xyzc) would be cool, hey I was stumbling in the dark a bit before coming here so yeah still epic stuff.
A while ago I tried to figure out some of these question when I was looking for a DAC. I was told that the FOCUSIRTE 2i2 would not sound different than the RME ADI-2 and boy were people wrong. The headphone jack was one thing but even in the line out to the YAMAHA HS8, I was surprised how much more "serious" the speaker sounded.
It's a really tough question because it probably cant be answered with a music test. This question probably has to be answered by someone who is using a tone generator and a DAC that has similar performance characteristics to the RME ADI-2-Pro FS. I would really like to hear general subjective opinions from people who have upgraded their amps and dacs. Tell me about your experience don't tell me what I should do...........
I'll do better:
You're a mess, specifically, you're a bias-confirmation-slash-attention-seeker wasting everyone's time, and I predict you'll be gone soon.
You're also a bad speller.
Your ineptitude serves as litter for the casual passer by who may not want to read through 90 posts to find a comment or question with some actual substance. And the fact that the rest of you are not only acknowledging this but taking the other side is deeply unsettling for what I expected from a "science" community.