@Salt,
@Ktacos,
My understanding is that member Polutrygeist was referring to the FR measurement data, and not the T/S parameters.
And by "Leap of Faith" he was suggesting "just listen to them" as opposed to go over the measured frequency response data.
Most of the wide-band (aka full range) drivers do not have smooth FR curves; there are directivity issues also. But their adherents love them, and you will find a number of these folks have moved away from their previous multi-way system setups and enjoy single wide band speakers.
If you go by FR measurement data, it can all look a bit unscientific... but my guess is that there are folks who prefer the wide-band driver sound despite the warts and all. And of course,
not all wide-band drivers measure alike.
I experimented with wide-band drivers; I eventually moved on to multiway. That is based on my listening preferences. I know people who prefer wide-bad/full range driver sound. I have a wide-band aficionado friend listen to my system, and he finds them much less involving; he misses the additional "detail" that wide-band drives often bring to the peaks in certain frequencies. He misses some of the forward presentation....
I have discussed with him about this and the conclusion is that he wants to have a presentation of the music that appeals to him, and is not bothered much about the faithful/neutral reproduction of the material as recorded. With his focal forward single wide-band driver with 300B SET he gets what he wants, and not with my more neutral 2 way / 3 way speakers with a low distortion amplifier driving them.
i am in no way implying that member Poultrygeist has similar preferences/reasoning to that of my friend; it was just a personal experience and example of two differing point of views on audio enjoyment.
So, to each their own...
Coming back to measured FR data - looking at those it is difficult to get excited about listening to wide-band driver systems. There are FAST (
Full Range
ASiss
Ted with woofer
) or WAW (
Wide-band
Assisted with
Woofer), where the wide-band driver acts as the mid-tweet, and the woofer does the heavy lifting of the low frequencies. With a FAST/WAW the wide-band is under much less pressure and can reproduce sound at higher SPLs with less distortion, improving the headroom. However, that does not magically solve the other shortcomings of the FR and directivity.
I have built WAWs with more neutral measuring wide-band drivers (Visaton B80, Vifa/Tympany TC9FD) as mid-tweets along with a Dayton RS225 woofer and found them enjoyable. The 3" wide-band drivers would be of course bass shy, and using them in WAW results in a much more capable speaker. I still prefer my DIY 3 way, but hey I am biased in my own way.
