Instead of gaslighting other audio hobbyists, try buying SS3602 and listen for yourself.
Sincerely, you have been gaslighting. The nitpicking and FUD-casting on other people's measurements and data. Jumping from topic to topic to keep from having to account for the things you are claiming. Misinterpreting. Not answering direct questions. Appeals to authority, and elitism. You seem to think you have unique access to stuff and experiences, which is odd given the forum you are posting at. For example, I have a box full of your unicorn OPA627. Let's check them out.
But first, briefly return to an example earlier in the thread, the OPA2604, and establish a baseline for distortion performance before I shoehorn some OPA627 into the preamp I have been using here.
I loaded pairs of NE5532, OP275, TL072, OPA2227, OPA2228, LM4562, OPA2604, OP270, OPA2132, OPA2134, and LF412C into the preamp. I swept the output to clipping. Here are THD+N and THD for the group. I zoom in on THD to get a better view.
The NE5532 and a handful of OpAmps all stand out with best distortion performance in this application. The OPA2134 is among the best for distortion, which is great since I also have the OPA134, and I can make single- to dual-OpAmp adapters.
I made two adapters since my preamp has two gain stages. The adapters prevented me from closing the lid on the preamp. But I see lots of OpAmp rollers who can no longer close lids on their gear.

Cut holes.

Etc. So I'm fine.
To establish a baseline between the OPA2134 performance and the OPA134 mounted on my adapters, I did four runs. I did a run with all OPA2134 in the preamp, a pair of runs with just one OPA134 adapter configured with an OPA2134, and a run with both OpAmps using the OPA134 adapters. All of these are line on line matched for distortion, which I measured since you would have cast doubt on the validity of the result since my adapters are crude, not made from exotic materials.
I get the same results with the OPA134 as the OPA2134. Let's compare the OPA627!
Next, I measure the OPA627 across output voltage. The OPA627 has slightly lower distortion at 2-4V.
This is great performance, the differences are tiny, not audible.
Here are OPA627 compared to OPA134 at 2V output.
There is simply no audible difference between these. The slightly different 2nd to 3rd HD between the OpAmps is just not notable at this low level.
Try not to overinterpret the gain again, I am attenuating to 6dB gain with a volume control - it's a preamp after all. The internal gain is much higher. I measure stuff where it will most commonly be used. Not in some corner case configuration like you keep suggesting.
And I measured the performance across output for you again, so that's covered. And I made sure I wasn't doing something silly or unfair to either OpAmp by overloading an input, despite some of your odd coaching you gave me earlier. Which is why I was laughing at you when you accused others of gaslighting.
Hey, since you were speculating, what other physical property determines how sound is reproduced?