• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Sony SS-CS5 3-way Speaker Review

To be fair with the target audience for these likely dominated by young folks, I bet quite a few of them can actually hear that high. If you ever want to hear what is missing when frequencies up there are not present (10k+) just eq them down /out. The music is very bland. Despite not a lot of content up there it is important.
Honestly, most of what you actually notice when you have speakers that go that high are terrible TV-show or movie masterings where they leave in some disgusting CRT whine or something similarly irritating.

The most recent example I encountered was Monk season 02, where a few dialogues have been re-recorded later, so that they contain absolutely ear-wrecking high-pitched CRT squeals. I'm not surprised that such mistakes have ended up in final releases, but oh boy they're annoying.
 
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Sony SS-CS5 3-way bookshelf speaker. Yes, you read that right. It is a 3-way speaker with a mid-range driver in a space where 99% of speakers are 2-way. I purchased it from Amazon for US $149. Bad for me but for those of you shopping for bargains, the SS-CS5 cost just US $78 including shipping for a pair!!! I can't sell you my used socks for that price and still come out whole.

Note: I used to work for Sony and our company Madrona Digital is a dealer for Sony so read as much bias as you want into this review.

While rather light, the SS-CS5 doesn't look particularly cheap or bad:

View attachment 65013

Here is the back side:

View attachment 65014

Is that Cyrillic translation I see for the word "manufactured?"
View attachment 65015
Speaker is made in Malaysia so why Russian language translation for that one word?

Measurements that you are about to see were performed using the Klippel Near-field Scanner (NFS). This is a robotic measurement system that analyzes the speaker all around and is able (using advanced mathematics and dual scan) to subtract room reflections (so where I measure it doesn't matter). It also measures the speaker at close distance ("near-field") which sharply reduces the impact of room noise. Both of these factors enable testing in ordinary rooms yet results that can be more accurate than an anechoic chamber. In a nutshell, the measurements show the actual sound coming out of the speaker independent of the room.

Worried that the soundfiled would be complex due to 3-way design, I upped the number of measurement points to above 800 but that still was not enough to fully capture the energy above 14 kHz. So what you see in the measurements below, underestimates the highest audible region by a few dBs.

Spinorama Audio Measurements
Acoustic measurements can be grouped in a way that can be perceptually analyzed to determine how good a speaker can be used. This so called spinorama shows us just about everything we need to know about the speaker with respect to tonality and some flaws:

View attachment 65017

We see fair bit of frequency response anomolifes identified by broad peaks and dips which should make them quite audible. We also have heightened energy starting around 8 kHz even though what is seen as noted is actually lower than reality.

We see resonances as indicated by the same blips in all three upper graphs around 1 kHz, and 2+ kHz.

There is also directivity error around 3 kHz so I imagine that is one of the crossover points (can't find the spec).

Room reflections are also uneven:

View attachment 65018

Putting it all together, this is what we can predict for a hypothetical average listening room:

View attachment 65019

It is more or less what we could have predicted from the on-axis response in the first graph. Overall, the response is not going to be balanced.

Horizontal directivity is not smooth and varies with the driver in play:
View attachment 65022

The tweeter "beams" (narrows its response) quite a bit compared to mid-range it seems.

Vertical response is hardly ever good in 2-way speakers. Here it seems more of a mess:

View attachment 65023

Notice how the tweeter response at 20 kHz is so spread out with dips and peaks.

Impedance graph shows some kinks which usually indicates resonances:

View attachment 65021

Here is our waterfall which can also indicate resonances and such:

View attachment 65024

Being a small speaker, I started the distortion measurements with 86 dB SPL at one meter:

View attachment 65025

We expect and get some distortion in low frequencies. But also get a peak around 5 kHz. This becomes much more clear when we look at the distortion percentages at both 86 and 96 dB SPL:

View attachment 65026

Hard to fault such a small and cheap speaker but still, expect a lot of distortion across the board especially if you turn it up.

Speaker Listening Tests
I always look forward to the first few seconds after the speaker plays. Here, I was like "maybe this is not so bad" until another five seconds passed and I said, "man this thing is bright!" It is so bright that if you play music in the dark, you may have to wear sunglasses! It is also muddy to some extent although the brightness gives the impression of detail.

On the "good news" side I could not get the woofer to bottom out. This is because it doesn't produce a ton of bass but importantly, it gets so bright and loud in upper registers that you want to turn it down.

So I reached into my audio toolbox of filters in Roon player to see if I can improve the sound. This is what I wound up with:
View attachment 65028

The first filter as show, worked very well, improving detail level and overall balance. But the sound was still quite bright. So I put in a quick and dirty shelving filter for the high frequencies. That tames some of the problems there but still, this is not a listenable speaker for me. It would require a lot more work to possibly make it not sound so bright.

For a quick test, I put my hand on the little tweeter and that gave much needed relief! If it were me, I would just disconnect the tweeter as a quick fix. My overall sanity would be in danger otherwise.

Conclusions
Boy, did I go into this review hoping for a great bargain at this price. Around $36 a speaker. Are you kidding me? Alas, that was not meant to be. I don't know what the objective scores are but subjective results are just too annoying for me to tolerate.

Needless to say, I cannot recommend the Sony SS-CS5 speaker.

-----------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

The pink panthers are getting restless and the males say they want to see some virtual "action" since they can't get it outdoor. Apparently there are videos for panthers procreating in the dark web but cost money to see them. So please donate a few dollars so that the panthers can see what they would naturally do in the wild using : https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
About the predicted in-room response being a downward-sloping line (output going down as frequency goes up) is that common for speakers? I ask because I see that a lot in speaker reviews.
 
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Sony SS-CS5 3-way bookshelf speaker. Yes, you read that right. It is a 3-way speaker with a mid-range driver in a space where 99% of speakers are 2-way. I purchased it from Amazon for US $149. Bad for me but for those of you shopping for bargains, the SS-CS5 cost just US $78 including shipping for a pair!!! I can't sell you my used socks for that price and still come out whole.

Note: I used to work for Sony and our company Madrona Digital is a dealer for Sony so read as much bias as you want into this review.

While rather light, the SS-CS5 doesn't look particularly cheap or bad:

View attachment 65013

Here is the back side:

View attachment 65014

Is that Cyrillic translation I see for the word "manufactured?"
View attachment 65015
Speaker is made in Malaysia so why Russian language translation for that one word?

Measurements that you are about to see were performed using the Klippel Near-field Scanner (NFS). This is a robotic measurement system that analyzes the speaker all around and is able (using advanced mathematics and dual scan) to subtract room reflections (so where I measure it doesn't matter). It also measures the speaker at close distance ("near-field") which sharply reduces the impact of room noise. Both of these factors enable testing in ordinary rooms yet results that can be more accurate than an anechoic chamber. In a nutshell, the measurements show the actual sound coming out of the speaker independent of the room.

Worried that the soundfiled would be complex due to 3-way design, I upped the number of measurement points to above 800 but that still was not enough to fully capture the energy above 14 kHz. So what you see in the measurements below, underestimates the highest audible region by a few dBs.

Spinorama Audio Measurements
Acoustic measurements can be grouped in a way that can be perceptually analyzed to determine how good a speaker can be used. This so called spinorama shows us just about everything we need to know about the speaker with respect to tonality and some flaws:

View attachment 65017

We see fair bit of frequency response anomolifes identified by broad peaks and dips which should make them quite audible. We also have heightened energy starting around 8 kHz even though what is seen as noted is actually lower than reality.

We see resonances as indicated by the same blips in all three upper graphs around 1 kHz, and 2+ kHz.

There is also directivity error around 3 kHz so I imagine that is one of the crossover points (can't find the spec).

Room reflections are also uneven:

View attachment 65018

Putting it all together, this is what we can predict for a hypothetical average listening room:

View attachment 65019

It is more or less what we could have predicted from the on-axis response in the first graph. Overall, the response is not going to be balanced.

Horizontal directivity is not smooth and varies with the driver in play:
View attachment 65022

The tweeter "beams" (narrows its response) quite a bit compared to mid-range it seems.

Vertical response is hardly ever good in 2-way speakers. Here it seems more of a mess:

View attachment 65023

Notice how the tweeter response at 20 kHz is so spread out with dips and peaks.

Impedance graph shows some kinks which usually indicates resonances:

View attachment 65021

Here is our waterfall which can also indicate resonances and such:

View attachment 65024

Being a small speaker, I started the distortion measurements with 86 dB SPL at one meter:

View attachment 65025

We expect and get some distortion in low frequencies. But also get a peak around 5 kHz. This becomes much more clear when we look at the distortion percentages at both 86 and 96 dB SPL:

View attachment 65026

Hard to fault such a small and cheap speaker but still, expect a lot of distortion across the board especially if you turn it up.

Speaker Listening Tests
I always look forward to the first few seconds after the speaker plays. Here, I was like "maybe this is not so bad" until another five seconds passed and I said, "man this thing is bright!" It is so bright that if you play music in the dark, you may have to wear sunglasses! It is also muddy to some extent although the brightness gives the impression of detail.

On the "good news" side I could not get the woofer to bottom out. This is because it doesn't produce a ton of bass but importantly, it gets so bright and loud in upper registers that you want to turn it down.

So I reached into my audio toolbox of filters in Roon player to see if I can improve the sound. This is what I wound up with:
View attachment 65028

The first filter as show, worked very well, improving detail level and overall balance. But the sound was still quite bright. So I put in a quick and dirty shelving filter for the high frequencies. That tames some of the problems there but still, this is not a listenable speaker for me. It would require a lot more work to possibly make it not sound so bright.

For a quick test, I put my hand on the little tweeter and that gave much needed relief! If it were me, I would just disconnect the tweeter as a quick fix. My overall sanity would be in danger otherwise.

Conclusions
Boy, did I go into this review hoping for a great bargain at this price. Around $36 a speaker. Are you kidding me? Alas, that was not meant to be. I don't know what the objective scores are but subjective results are just too annoying for me to tolerate.

Needless to say, I cannot recommend the Sony SS-CS5 speaker.

-----------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

The pink panthers are getting restless and the males say they want to see some virtual "action" since they can't get it outdoor. Apparently there are videos for panthers procreating in the dark web but cost money to see them. So please donate a few dollars so that the panthers can see what they would naturally do in the wild using : https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
Not bad, not bad at all for the price.
It's a shame the near field wasn't measured. To expose that golden label.
I don't get the idea?
As if his job is to render hi-res music materials?
Does this mean we don't need DAC anymore?
 
EAC just reviewed the V2 and his takeaway is that the Version 2 refines the SS‑CS5 with better bracing, a smoother sonic profile, improved bass extension, and a lighter, modern design. While not groundbreaking—especially in imaging and output—it’s a worthwhile upgrade if priced close to V1 or if you prioritize neutral tonality.

 
I can't help feeling that if they'd taken the cost of that utterly redundant super-tweeter and invested it in one or two extra crossover components, this could have been an incredible value-for-money speaker.

I mean really! It's crossed over at a frequency at which 50+% of the population can't hear anything anyway o_O
Yes, but they can see very well and that tweeter shines like sequins on a T-shirt.
I beat lots of girls have these ones in maching colors and they love listening Kate Perry new album :facepalm:
 
I can't help feeling that if they'd taken the cost of that utterly redundant super-tweeter and invested it in one or two extra crossover components, this could have been an incredible value-for-money speaker.

I mean really! It's crossed over at a frequency at which 50+% of the population can't hear anything anyway o_O
But that tweeter shines so beautifully and I'm sure the girls are crazy about them in the right color of course.
Kate Perry newer sound better:D
 
Back
Top Bottom