• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Sony BDP-S1700/K Review (Blu-Ray/DVD/CD Transport)

Rate this BR/DVD/CD Transport

  • Terrible (*)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mediocre (**)

    Votes: 1 1.2%
  • Good (***)

    Votes: 13 15.7%
  • Excellent (****)

    Votes: 69 83.1%

  • Total voters
    83

NTTY

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Reviewer
Joined
Apr 27, 2018
Messages
1,424
Likes
9,280
Location
Switzerland
Hello everyone,

This is a review and measurements of the Sony BDP-S1700/K Blu-Ray/DVD/CD transport.

Sony S1700_001.jpg



Sony BDP-S1700/K - Presentation

A number of you have expressed their interest for recent Sony Blu-Ray transports, to know if they could act as decent CD Player. Two weeks ago, I was at the shopping center and saw that one at a very reasonable price (below $100) and so I went for it.

You can find all details about this device on Sony's website, and the elements of interests for me, that I took from the community, were:
  • This is a (CD) transport
  • It has a Coax (SPDIF) output to use with modern or older DACs in a "standard" HiFi environment
  • It is reasonably priced
I will be testing it on CD Transport perspective, and I will also have a quick look at higher resolution sources. The principle is to use Coax output only because I'm not equipped to measure digital HDMI output. I would probably need to invest into an AV preamplifier with HDMI input, but that's not planned.

So, it is a transport, no DAC inside, meaning that the back is very simple:

Sony S1700_002.jpg


We have one HDMI output and one Coax. It is not documented in the User Guide, but because SPDIF is not HDCP (Digital Content Protection) compliant, copyright holders do not allow high-quality, high-resolution audio to be passed through it. That means this Coax (SPDIF) output should be restricted to "CD quality", and that is max 16bits/48kHz. We'll check if that's the case, and since it implies an ASRC is in the digital chain, we want to know what's the impact of that on the PCM data (especially from CDA). In other words, and that's the main concern, can we get "digitally perfect" output from an Audio CD.


User Experience

No display on the front, you'll need a TV to see anything. Only two buttons, one to power on/off and one to open/close the tray, rest requires the remote control.

The good news is that, out of the box, there's no need to configure anything to listen to a CD. Plug in, insert the disc, press play on the remote (CD playback is selected by default after it recognizes there's a CD in the drawer), and you're good to go. Not even needed to connect it to a TV for whatever setup, provided you only intend to listen to a CDA.

It's not fast to skip a track, less so multiple, but is that a real problem if you're into listening to a full album at once? FFW/REW are available from the remote control but painful as it will skip 20sec at once and you get no audible feedback. But well, I survived it.

The drive is relatively noisy (50cm next to me), especially when reaching the outer section of a CD. It is difficult for me to tell you if you'd be annoyed as we don't have the same sensitivity to that type of noise. I could not hear it with my Beyer DT770Pro on my ears.

It had no issue reading 70min+ discs, CDR nor the CD layer of an SACD. I dreamt it would read the SACD layer and propose a downmix to PCM, but no. Anyways, most of the studios are now producing and releasing a CD layer made from the same mix than the one of the SACD master, so the quality is the same, only bit depth is decreased and proper shape dither applied to compensate for it, so I'm not too worried. A "stupid conversion to PCM" in the Player could be much worse.

Last before I go into the measurements blah blah, is that I must admit I spent unusual time listening to it (via the Topping D50III and A50III with my good old Beyer DT770 Pro), pushing the volume always more and more. I surprised myself, as I typed this review, to stop sometimes, close my eyes and listen to what I hear, or play air piano/drums/guitar. It made this review particularly long to finalize :)
That is, I had surprising pleasure and I guess it already tells you about what I'll soon report on quality perspective. The foot print of all my messy setup is reasonable as per the below picture (on top of Sir Accuphase DP-70):

Sony S1700_003.jpg


You can't trust my old ears, anyways, but we are talking about a Sony, the masters of CD, and if Sony decides a device is to play a CD, it will play it per the Redbook. So yes, I am happy to report it is gapless playback and applies de-emphasis when required (in digital domain). This is a proper CD player! In a world of where many actors have forgotten about the Redbook, or just don't care, this is reassuring. Thank you Sony!

I'll be dividing this review in 3 sections:
  1. CD digital measurements + Drive tests
  2. High-res digital audio measurements (from USB and DVD-A)
  3. Analogue measurements from the Topping DAC (CD source only)

Sony BDP-S1700/K - Measurements (Coax out, CDA as source)

All measurements performed with an E1DA Cosmos ADCiso (grade 0), and the Cosmos Scaler (100kohms from unbalanced input) for analog outputs, and a Motu UltraLite Mk5 for digital.

I am now consistent with my specific measurements for CD Players, as I described them in the post “More than we hear”, and as I reported them for the SMSL PL-200 review. I used the commercial version of my Audio Technical CD for all measurements. Over time, this will help comparing the devices I reviewed.

The Sony BDP-1700S/K came with Firmware version M47.R.0011. I could not find a more recent one on Sony's website.

As a transport I only have the digital output to measure to verify it is "bit perfect". They are the same tests that I perform with all the CD Players I review when they offer a digital output.

This is my standard 999.91Hz test tone @0dBFS (without dither):

Sony S1700_999.91Hz_0dBFS.jpg


It is the same as if I run this test directly from the original WAV file that was used to create the CD. So it is "perfect".

----

Same with the good old 3DC test from Stereophile (undithered 997Hz sine at -90.31dBFS. With 16bits, the signal should appear (on a scope) as the 3DC levels of the smallest symmetrical sign magnitude digital signal):,

Sony S1700_3DC.jpg


It is the expected square view that we want to see, with the Gibbs Phenomenon showing itself. That means no modification of the digital signal.

----

Of course, jitter is absent:

Sony S1700_JT.jpg


This the exact graphical representation of the test.

----

In the end, my ultimate proof of "perfect" digital output is when I reuse the intersample overs test at 5512.50Hz, with a phase shift of 67.5°, like I did for the TASCAM CD-200 review. This signal generates an overshoot of +0.69dB and so if the signal would be modified before being sent, it would show either a reduction of amplitude or we'd see some sort of saturation/increase noise/distortion. So here we go:

Sony S1700_ISO.jpg


No changes when compared with the WAV file, again. We get the expected +0.69dB overshoot and no distortion whatsoever. So if there's an ASRC on the digital path (and there is one, see below), it works here in bypass mode.

----

The only small issue I could find with he Sony is a small imprecision of the internal clock that travels through the SPDIF. If you use a converter that has a very low phase noise clock, this variation will be filtered out by the PLL. If not, then you'll get a reasonably low -25ppm deviation (good luck to hear that).

I won't be adding more unnecessary measurements, it is every time the same story: I get the same as the original WAV files. It means the coax digital output of this transport is unaltered from CDA.


Sony BDP-1700S/K - Testing the drive

What would be good measurements if the drive would not properly read a slightly scratched CD, or one that was created at the limits of the norm? The below tests reply to these questions.

Here are the results:

Test typeTechnical testResults
Variation of linear cutting velocityFrom 1.20m/s to 1.40m/sPass
Variation of track pitchFrom 1.5µm to 1.7µmPass
Combined variations of track pitch and velocityFrom 1.20m/s & 1.5µm to 1.40m/s & 1.7µmPass
HF detection (asymmetry pitch/flat ratio)Variation from 2% to 18%Pass
Dropouts resistanceFrom 0.05mm (0.038ms) to 4mm (3.080ms)Pass
Combined dropouts and smallest pitchFrom 1.5µm & 1mm to 1.5µm & 2.4mmPass
Successive dropoutsFrom 2x0.1mm to 2x3mmPass

Yeah! Best in class! Not only a handful of drives achieve this performance, the Sony is also the least expensive transport (new) that I tested! I saw the Sony SERVO starting interpolating at high dropouts of 2.4mm and I could not hear anything up to 4mm. Drill a tiny hole in the CD, and the S1700 will continue to read it with you noticing :p


Sony BDP-S1700/K - Measurements (Coax out, USB and DVD-A as sources)

So we stay in digital domain for these measurements.

For the sake of simplicity, I'll show you only the standard dashboard with my pseudo 1kHz test tone.

First, from USB key (1kHz @0dBFS 24bits/48kHz):

Sony S1700_999.91Hz_0dBFS_USB.jpg


As per the HDCP regulations, the signal is reduced to 16bits depth AND 48kHz output. I tried with 96kHz and 192kHz sampling rate test files, and got the same output 16bits/48kHz. We are indeed limited by 16bits/48kHz. At least the decrease of bit depth does not come with significant distorsion, but SNR is now limited to 99dB, as you can see.

Now, from a DVD-A, it is not the same story at all. Look at the same test tone (24bits/48kHz):

Sony S1700_999.91Hz_0dBFS_DVDA.jpg


If the dashboard shows 16bits resolution, it is because of the distortion, and not limitation from the noise floor. Looking at the noise floor level, we are close to 18bits resolution. This is not the 24bits recorded on the DVD-A. So there is again significant processing here, and that does not to comply with 16bits/48kHz output. Strange.

Problem is that the situation degrades with lower levels of output as the distortion is roughly constant, and not level dependent (not shown). This is weird but means I can't recommend using it to listen to DVD-A, if you still have some. I could not find a firmware update to potentially fix this issue.

In the end, don't expect anything high resolution from the Coax output, use it for CD playback only. And note that a WAV file 16bits/44.1kHz, played from the USB stick, outputs the original unaltered PCM data stream.


Sony BDP-S1700/K - Measurements (CD source with Topping D50III as DAC)

Let me finalize this review with few tests from the output of the high precision DAC Topping D50III, the Sony BDP-S1700/K being the source, from CD audio. I used the RCA outputs of the Topping.

----

As usual, let's start with my standard 999.91Hz sine @0dBFS (without dither) from the Test CD (RCA out of the D50III):

Sony S1700_999.91Hz_0dBFS_D50III.jpg


As I reported with the test of the SMSL PL200, this is near perfection, so close to the original WAV file, and thanks to the high resolution of the Topping. Some distortion (at -135dBr!) might be due to my ADC, by the way, with that high-level test tone.

Let's try at -6dBFS:

Sony S1700_999.91Hz_-6dBFS_D50III.jpg


Peeeerfect! You can't dream for more. The limit in the PCM 16bits format here, not the Topping and of course not the Sony!

I'll spare you with more measurements, but just a last one. Look at this magnificent Jitter trace:

Sony S1700_JT_D50III.jpg


It looks like the one done directly from the WAV file, but no, here we indeed have the Sony feeding the D50III and the result is nothing else but absolutely perfect. Impressive.

----

Now, one very interesting thing here, about the "intersample-overs" test which intends to identify the behavior of the digital filtering and DAC when it come to process near clipping signals. Because of the oversampling, there might be interpolated data that go above 0dBFS and would saturate (clip) the DAC and therefore the output. And this effect shows through distorsion (THD+N measurement up to 96kHz). But let me lower the Topping output by 3dB, since we have so much headroom with 16bits signal:


Intersample-overs tests
Bandwidth of the THD+N measurements is 20Hz - 96kHz
5512.5 Hz sine,
Peak = +0.69dBFS
7350 Hz sine,
Peak = +1.25dBFS
11025 Hz sine,
Peak = +3.0dBFS
Teac VRDS-20-30.7dB-26.6dB-17.6dB
Yamaha CD-1-84.6dB-84.9dB-78.1dB
Denon DCD-900NE-34.2dB-27.1dB-19.1dB
Denon DCD-SA1-33.6dB-27.6dB-18.3dB
Onkyo C-733-88.3dB-40.4dB-21.2dB
Denon DCD-3560-30.2dB-24.7dB-17.4dB
Myryad Z210-70.6dB (noise dominated)-71.1dB (noise dominated)-29.4dB (H3 dominated)
Sony CDP-X333ES-30.5dB-24.8dB-16.3dB
BARCO-EMT 982-32.7dB-24.5dB-16.3dB
TASCAM CD-200-73.5dB-36.3dB-19.7dB
Sony CDP-597-30.4dB-24.7dB-16.5dB
SMSL PL100-53.1dB-31dB-19.1dB
OPPO BDP-95-39dB-28.8dB-19.2dB
OPPO BDP-95 (vol -2dB)-95dB-97.5dB-32.7dB
SMSL PL200-94.8dB-97dB-39.5dB
SMSL PL200 (vol -1dB)-94.8dB-97dB-58.7dB
Orpheus Zero-88.7dB-87.3dB-56.8dB
Azur 640C V2-89.8dB-91dB-64.5dB
NAD C540-34.1dB-26.3dB-20.4dB
Consonance CD120B-84.3dB-39.6dB-20.9dB
Fosi Merak-38.8dB-28.5dB-18.5dB
PROCEED PCD 3-29.7dB-23.9dB-15.8dB
Sony BDP-S1700/K + Topping D50III (vol -3dB)-95.1dB-97.1dB-97.2dB

Best of the best! Actually I never performed this test before with a transport and the D50III. And it means what it means: this combo provided me with the best analogue output I ever witnessed! Even the star SMSL PL200 started to slightly clip with 3dB overs. And if you're worried that -3dB output volume might decrease max performance, let me reassure you:

Sony S1700_999.91Hz_0dBFS_D50III_Vol-3dB.jpg


Actually the third harmonic, that we could see from my initial test, is gone :cool: So that is the equivalent of measuring the original WAV file!


Conclusion

You get here one of the best CD Transport ever made at a very low price, from a highly praised brand. I was expecting nothing special from this Transport, what a biased mistake that was!

Not only the digital output is untouched, the drive resistance to borderline pressed CDs or those that suffered a very busy life, and that many CD Players would have difficulties to read (or fail to), is a HUGE plus.

Only the small clock deviation could be improved. Probably Sony thought about leaving something to please the DIY community?

With a well chosen DAC, you'll be able to benefit from what most of us never had: absolute transparency -- a SOTA CD Player of all times.

And note that all my measurements were performed with the HDMI output feeding a monitor. I tried also without the cable connected, and I saw the same perfection, of course, what more to expect?

Remains the ergonomics, clearly not the best, but if you accept to turn on the TV, it's more than ok. Fact that it plays, OOB and without setup required, a CDA with absolute perfection is something I particularly appreciate.

Never one Sony CD Player failed me, in my reviews. As a CD lover, I can only praise Sony for keeping up with the CD, giving it careful attention. Sony left the market of pure CD Player, but did they, really? I think this Blu-Ray tells us that no. More than 40 years later, their engineers still care about their baby. I love it.

---------------
Somewhere deep down at Sony, there is a piece of code, know as the Primary Gene, that rules everything out, its internal code name is CDA :p:cool:
---------------

The conclusion of the conclusion is that what I measured, with the Sony and the Topping acting together, made me want to listen more to them. And that is the pleasure I was talking about in the introduction. What if you'd know that after inserting a CD and pressing play, the only thing you'd need to care about is sit, relax, listen, and enjoy? Because what you get is exactly, precisely to the last bit, what the artists wanted you to hear. What a delight...

Enjoy your weekend!

Flo
 
Last edited:
Very, very cool this review @NTTY , thanks!

I have this player and used it in my surround system, HDMI out to an avr. Upgraded to the S6700 because that one plays SACD as well and is not much more expensive.

Expected it to perform well.

Form factor is the only issue. It looks and feels cheap.

True story why I like these players. We had a lightning strike close to our house. In the neighborhood several houses had severe damage to equipment. In our house only the Sony DVD player burned out.

I still think it was an energy sink that saved us...
 
Is it even possible to buy a universal blu-ray player and AVR set up that plays all formats as intended? SACD as DSD, DVD-A and blu-ray both at 24/96. I guess there's no such thing as universal.
 
I bought an open box Sony CD/DVD player DVP-SR760H on Ebay last year for 29 euros because my old Philips blue ray player broke. It works reasonably well as a DVD player and I also tried it as a CD transporter and I didn't notice any difference in sound quality from my other CD players. It feels like a toy in use, but the sound quality is good.
 
Hello everyone,

This is a review and measurements of the Sony BDP-S1700/K Blu-Ray/DVD/CD transport.

View attachment 535724


Sony BDP-S1700/K - Presentation

A number of you have expressed their interest for recent Sony Blu-Ray transports, to know if they could act as decent CD Player. Two weeks ago, I was at the shopping center and saw that one at a very reasonable price (below $100) and so I went for it.

You can find all details about this device on Sony's website, and the elements of interests for me, that I took from the community, were:
  • This is a (CD) transport
  • It has a Coax (SPDIF) output to use with modern or older DACs in a "standard" HiFi environment
  • It is reasonably priced
I will be testing it on CD Transport perspective, and I will also have a quick look at higher resolution sources. The principle is to use Coax output only because I'm not equipped to measure digital HDMI output. I would probably need to invest into an AV preamplifier with HDMI input, but that's not planned.

So, it is a transport, no DAC inside, meaning that the back is very simple:

View attachment 535725

We have one HDMI output and one Coax. It is not documented in the User Guide, but because SPDIF is not HDCP (Digital Content Protection) compliant, copyright holders do not allow high-quality, high-resolution audio to be passed through it. That means this Coax (SPDIF) output should be restricted to "CD quality", and that is max 16bits/48kHz. We'll check if that's the case, and since it implies an ASRC is in the digital chain, we want to know what's the impact of that on the PCM data (especially from CDA). In other words, and that's the main concern, can we get "digitally perfect" output from an Audio CD.


User Experience

No display on the front, you'll need a TV to see anything. Only two buttons, one to power on/off and one to open/close the tray, rest requires the remote control.

The good news is that, out of the box, there's no need to configure anything to listen to a CD. Plug in, insert the disc, press play on the remote (CD playback is selected by default after it recognizes there's a CD in the drawer), and you're good to go. Not even needed to connect it to a TV for whatever setup, provided you only intend to listen to a CDA.

It's not fast to skip a track, less so multiple, but is that a real problem if you're into listening to a full album at once? FFW/REW are available from the remote control but painful as it will skip 20sec at once and you get no audible feedback. But well, I survived it.

The drive is relatively noisy (50cm next to me), especially when reaching the outer section of a CD. It is difficult for me to tell you if you'd be annoyed as we don't have the same sensitivity to that type of noise. I could not hear it with my Beyer DT770Pro on my ears.

It had no issue reading 70min+ discs, CDR nor the CD layer of an SACD. I dreamt it would read the SACD layer and propose a downmix to PCM, but no. Anyways, most of the studios are now producing and releasing a CD layer made from the same mix than the one of the SACD master, so the quality is the same, only bit depth is decreased and proper shape dither applied to compensate for it, so I'm not too worried. A "stupid conversion to PCM" in the Player could be much worse.

Last before I go into the measurements blah blah, is that I must admit I spent unusual time listening to it (via the Topping D50III and A50III with my good old Beyer DT770 Pro), pushing the volume always more and more. I surprised myself, as I typed this review, to stop sometimes, close my eyes and listen to what I hear, or play air piano/drums/guitar. It made this review particularly long to finalize :)
That is, I had surprising pleasure and I guess it already tells you about what I'll soon report on quality perspective. The foot print of all my messy setup is reasonable as per the below picture (on top of Sir Accuphase DP-70):

View attachment 535728

You can't trust my old ears, anyways, but we are talking about a Sony, the masters of CD, and if Sony decides a device is to play a CD, it will play it per the Redbook. So yes, I am happy to report it is gapless playback and applies de-emphasis when required (in digital domain). This is a proper CD player! In a world of where many actors have forgotten about the Redbook, or just don't care, this is reassuring. Thank you Sony!

I'll be dividing this review in 3 sections:
  1. CD digital measurements + Drive tests
  2. High-res digital audio measurements (from USB and DVD-A)
  3. Analogue measurements from the Topping DAC (CD source only)

Sony BDP-S1700/K - Measurements (Coax out, CDA as source)

All measurements performed with an E1DA Cosmos ADCiso (grade 0), and the Cosmos Scaler (100kohms from unbalanced input) for analog outputs, and a Motu UltraLite Mk5 for digital.

I am now consistent with my specific measurements for CD Players, as I described them in the post “More than we hear”, and as I reported them for the SMSL PL-200 review. I used the commercial version of my Audio Technical CD for all measurements. Over time, this will help comparing the devices I reviewed.

The Sony BDP-1700S/K came with Firmware version M47.R.0011. I could not find a more recent one on Sony's website.

As a transport I only have the digital output to measure to verify it is "bit perfect". They are the same tests that I perform with all the CD Players I review when they offer a digital output.

This is my standard 999.91Hz test tone @0dBFS (without dither):

View attachment 535726

It is the same as if I run this test directly from the original WAV file that was used to create the CD. So it is "perfect".

----

Same with the good old 3DC test from Stereophile (undithered 997Hz sine at -90.31dBFS. With 16bits, the signal should appear (on a scope) as the 3DC levels of the smallest symmetrical sign magnitude digital signal):,

View attachment 535729

It is the expected square view that we want to see, with the Gibbs Phenomenon showing itself. That means no modification of the digital signal.

----

Of course, jitter is absent:

View attachment 535730

This the exact graphical representation of the test.

----

In the end, my ultimate proof of "perfect" digital output is when I reuse the intersample overs test at 5512.50Hz, with a phase shift of 67.5°, like I did for the TASCAM CD-200 review. This signal generates an overshoot of +0.69dB and so if the signal would be modified before being sent, it would show either a reduction of amplitude or we'd see some sort of saturation/increase noise/distortion. So here we go:

View attachment 535731

No changes when compared with the WAV file, again. We get the expected +0.69dB overshoot and no distortion whatsoever. So if there's an ASRC on the digital path (and there is one, see below), it works here in bypass mode.

----

The only small issue I could find with he Sony is a small imprecision of the internal clock that travels through the SPDIF. If you use a converter that has a very low phase noise clock, this variation will be filtered out by the PLL. If not, then you'll get a reasonably low -25ppm deviation (good luck to hear that).

I won't be adding more unnecessary measurements, it is every time the same story: I get the same as the original WAV files. It means the coax digital output of this transport is unaltered from CDA.


Sony BDP-1700S/K - Testing the drive

What would be good measurements if the drive would not properly read a slightly scratched CD, or one that was created at the limits of the norm? The below tests reply to these questions.

Here are the results:

Test typeTechnical testResults
Variation of linear cutting velocityFrom 1.20m/s to 1.40m/sPass
Variation of track pitchFrom 1.5µm to 1.7µmPass
Combined variations of track pitch and velocityFrom 1.20m/s & 1.5µm to 1.40m/s & 1.7µmPass
HF detection (asymmetry pitch/flat ratio)Variation from 2% to 18%Pass
Dropouts resistanceFrom 0.05mm (0.038ms) to 4mm (3.080ms)Pass
Combined dropouts and smallest pitchFrom 1.5µm & 1mm to 1.5µm & 2.4mmPass
Successive dropoutsFrom 2x0.1mm to 2x3mmPass

Yeah! Best in class! Not only a handful of drives achieve this performance, the Sony is also the least expensive transport (new) that I tested! I saw the Sony SERVO starting interpolating at high dropouts of 2.4mm and I could not hear anything up to 4mm. Drill a tiny hole in the CD, and the S1700 will continue to read it with you noticing :p


Sony BDP-S1700/K - Measurements (Coax out, USB and DVD-A as sources)

So we stay in digital domain for these measurements.

For the sake of simplicity, I'll show you only the standard dashboard with my pseudo 1kHz test tone.

First, from USB key (1kHz @0dBFS 24bits/48kHz):

View attachment 535733

As per the HDCP regulations, the signal is reduced to 16bits depth AND 48kHz output. I tried with 96kHz and 192kHz sampling rate test files, and got the same output 16bits/48kHz. We are indeed limited by 16bits/48kHz. At least the decrease of bit depth does not come with significant distorsion, but SNR is now limited to 99dB, as you can see.

Now, from a DVD-A, it is not the same story at all. Look at the same test tone (24bits/48kHz):

View attachment 535735

If the dashboard shows 16bits resolution, it is because of the distortion, and not limitation from the noise floor. Looking at the noise floor level, we are close to 18bits resolution. This is not the 24bits recorded on the DVD-A. So there is again significant processing here, and that does not to comply with 16bits/48kHz output. Strange.

Problem is that the situation degrades with lower levels of output as the distortion is roughly constant, and not level dependent (not shown). This is weird but means I can't recommend using it to listen to DVD-A, if you still have some. I could not find a firmware update to potentially fix this issue.

In the end, don't expect anything high resolution from the Coax output, use it for CD playback only. And note that a WAV file 16bits/44.1kHz, played from the USB stick, outputs the original unaltered PCM data stream.


Sony BDP-S1700/K - Measurements (CD source with Topping D50III as DAC)

Let me finalize this review with few tests from the output of the high precision DAC Topping D50III, the Sony BDP-S1700/K being the source, from CD audio. I used the RCA outputs of the Topping.

----

As usual, let's start with my standard 999.91Hz sine @0dBFS (without dither) from the Test CD (RCA out of the D50III):

View attachment 535737

As I reported with the test of the SMSL PL200, this is near perfection, so close to the original WAV file, and thanks to the high resolution of the Topping. Some distortion (at -135dBr!) might be due to my ADC, by the way, with that high-level test tone.

Let's try at -6dBFS:

View attachment 535738

Peeeerfect! You can't dream for more. The limit in the PCM 16bits format here, not the Topping and of course not the Sony!

I'll spare you with more measurements, but just a last one. Look at this magnificent Jitter trace:

View attachment 535739

It looks like the one done directly from the WAV file, but no, here we indeed have the Sony feeding the D50III and the result is nothing else but absolutely perfect. Impressive.

----

Now, one very interesting thing here, about the "intersample-overs" test which intends to identify the behavior of the digital filtering and DAC when it come to process near clipping signals. Because of the oversampling, there might be interpolated data that go above 0dBFS and would saturate (clip) the DAC and therefore the output. And this effect shows through distorsion (THD+N measurement up to 96kHz). But let me lower the Topping output by 3dB, since we have so much headroom with 16bits signal:


Intersample-overs tests
Bandwidth of the THD+N measurements is 20Hz - 96kHz
5512.5 Hz sine,
Peak = +0.69dBFS
7350 Hz sine,
Peak = +1.25dBFS
11025 Hz sine,
Peak = +3.0dBFS
Teac VRDS-20-30.7dB-26.6dB-17.6dB
Yamaha CD-1-84.6dB-84.9dB-78.1dB
Denon DCD-900NE-34.2dB-27.1dB-19.1dB
Denon DCD-SA1-33.6dB-27.6dB-18.3dB
Onkyo C-733-88.3dB-40.4dB-21.2dB
Denon DCD-3560-30.2dB-24.7dB-17.4dB
Myryad Z210-70.6dB (noise dominated)-71.1dB (noise dominated)-29.4dB (H3 dominated)
Sony CDP-X333ES-30.5dB-24.8dB-16.3dB
BARCO-EMT 982-32.7dB-24.5dB-16.3dB
TASCAM CD-200-73.5dB-36.3dB-19.7dB
Sony CDP-597-30.4dB-24.7dB-16.5dB
SMSL PL100-53.1dB-31dB-19.1dB
OPPO BDP-95-39dB-28.8dB-19.2dB
OPPO BDP-95 (vol -2dB)-95dB-97.5dB-32.7dB
SMSL PL200-94.8dB-97dB-39.5dB
SMSL PL200 (vol -1dB)-94.8dB-97dB-58.7dB
Orpheus Zero-88.7dB-87.3dB-56.8dB
Azur 640C V2-89.8dB-91dB-64.5dB
NAD C540-34.1dB-26.3dB-20.4dB
Consonance CD120B-84.3dB-39.6dB-20.9dB
Fosi Merak-38.8dB-28.5dB-18.5dB
PROCEED PCD 3-29.7dB-23.9dB-15.8dB
Sony BDP-S1700/K + Topping D50III (vol -3dB)-95.1dB-97.1dB-97.2dB

Best of the best! Actually I never performed this test before with a transport and the D50III. And it means what it means: this combo provided me with the best analogue output I ever witnessed! Even the star SMSL PL200 started to slightly clip with 3dB overs. And if you're worried that -3dB output volume might decrease max performance, let me reassure you:

View attachment 535747

Actually the third harmonic, that we could see from my initial test, is gone :cool: So that is the equivalent of measuring the original WAV file!


Conclusion

You get here one of the best CD Transport ever made at a very low price, from a highly praised brand. I was expecting nothing special from this Transport, what a biased mistake that was!

Not only the digital output is untouched, the drive resistance to borderline pressed CDs or those that suffered a very busy life, and that many CD Players would have difficulties to read (or fail to), is a HUGE plus.

Only the small clock deviation could be improved. Probably Sony thought about leaving something to please the DIY community?

With a well chosen DAC, you'll be able to benefit from what most of us never had: absolute transparency -- a SOTA CD Player of all times.

And note that all my measurements were performed with the HDMI output feeding a monitor. I tried also without the cable connected, and I saw the same perfection, of course, what more to expect?

Remains the ergonomics, clearly not the best, but if you accept to turn on the TV, it's more than ok. Fact that it plays, OOB and without setup required, a CDA with absolute perfection is something I particularly appreciate.

Never one Sony CD Player failed me, in my reviews. As a CD lover, I can only praise Sony for keeping up with the CD, giving it careful attention. Sony left the market of pure CD Player, but did they, really? I think this Blu-Ray tells us that no. More than 40 years later, their engineers still care about their baby. I love it.

---------------
Somewhere deep down at Sony, there is a piece of code, know as the Primary Gene, that rules everything out, its internal code name is CDA :p:cool:
---------------

The conclusion of the conclusion is that what I measured, with the Sony and the Topping acting together, made me want to listen more to them. And that is the pleasure I was talking about in the introduction. What if you'd know that after inserting a CD and pressing play, the only thing you'd need to care about is sit, relax, listen, and enjoy? Because what you get is exactly, precisely to the last bit, what the artists wanted you to hear. What a delight...

Enjoy your weekend!

Flo

Hallo Flo,
Now it finally happens: exactly what I predicted in a personal massage in September 27, 2025!
The sound quality of cheap BluRay Players, used as CD Players, may be also a sensation!
I have not managed to buy a second item of the BD 420 from LG. And it’s perhaps a bit difficult to send some HiFi-Electronics to Switzerland, even if it is used.
But Maybe, I can donate EUR 50,— or so to you via PayPal friend and family and you can buy a used one and test it as you have tested the Sony???
If perhaps any other member is interested in getting Flo in such a research project (and donating him EUR 5,— or so for purchasing another cheap BluRay-Player), please contact him via p.m.!

Here is the translation of my p.m. from September 2025:

Dear Flo,
First of all, I have to say how thrilled I am with your incredibly in-depth CD player reviews in general—and, of course, with the Oppo and S.M.S. (!) L.(!) tests in particular.
That’s absolutely awesome—I wouldn’t know where else to get this kind of information, right down to the inter-sample issues.
A heartfelt thank you for that!

I’d like to ask if it would be beneath you to take a closer look at a very specific LG Blu-ray player:
I’d buy it cheaply on Kleinanzeigen.de and ship it directly to you in Switzerland.

Here’s why I’m curious:
I originally come from the German forum https://www.aktives-hoeren.de/, where I can also be found under the username totti1965.
There, Dr. Gert Volk’s modifications are all the rage. And I, too, have owned a Sonos StreamerDAC modified by him for over 7 years, a second one for 4 years, and of course a Linn Majik modified by Gert.

The following subjective experience gave me pause.
When, for lack of a CD player, I dragged the LG BP420—equipped with analog audio outputs—from the living room into the listening room and compared a few Tidal tracks (I think it was Reinhard Mey), played through the modified Linn Majik and the modified Sonos, with the CD (played through the LG BP420, which now costs only about EUR 100), it sounded, contrary to expectations, much better and more natural through the LG.
I didn’t have an exact level match and even it could have been differently mastered versions of the same song…. But in any case, I imagined that the LG Blu-ray player sounds damn audiophile……

So would you be interested in putting this “favorite killer” on your lab bench?
Maybe Oppo isn’t the only company that’s made sure their Blu-ray players sound great???

Since ours still does a good job playing movies in the living room every now and then, I’d just buy a BD420 for around EUR 30 and send it straight to you in Switzerland.
Since sending it back and forth would surely just annoy you, you should keep it as a gift/donation.

You would be doing audio science another great service with these measurements!

I’m from Bonn, Germany…….



Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
 
Last edited:
So then I will keep my cheapo CDP-XE 700 in my main system as transport. I think it is 30 years old now and still reads every CD I throw at it.

I was already fearing the worst when I saw the picture of the backside and read "Java powered"... :eek:
 
Nice, especially the ability to read even the worst abused discs. But without a display it's a big no for me.
+ this "The drive is relatively noisy (50cm next to me)"
 
I was thinking this could be a good cheap transport for my study system but I can't find these for sale anywhere in Australia unfortunately.
 
Thank you @NTTY ! I had one of these, or perhaps a very similar Sony, that I bought used for $20 and it was a delight through an SMSL C200 DAC.

Some thoughts:
1. If you hook it up to a TV you can enter the menu and select fast loading. It makes a big difference and you only have to do it once.

2. The remote works great but is a bit small with a surfeit of buttons you’ll never need.

3. I found the mechanical noise a little distracting.

4. The lack of any display at all is slightly annoying for selecting tracks.

It seemed to me that any player able to read 4k BluRay likely finds audio CDs a doddle. Very cool to see your tests confirm this.

IMG_6142.jpeg
 
Last edited:
As always, great review by Flo! Thank you.

The digital results are certainly fantastic, but a drive mechanism that you can still hear from 50 cm away?
We are talking about standard playback spinning noise? I'll give it a pass!
There are many older players that are almost inaudible, even at very close range.
In that respect, it is not SOTA - it is simply a mechanical design flaw.

A 20-second gap when FFW or REW? That's not practical either.
The gap performance is stunning but I don't care as 99 % of my CDs are in pristine condition.

Rated mediocre.
 
I've looked at several of these kind of transports so I can put my CD collection to use, but sadly the usability problems (slow loading, slow track skipping, slow/unwieldy seeking, remote-only operation, drive noise, etc.) have put me off every time. If I'm taking out the physical disc, I want the experience to be more pleasing than just listening to the CD rip on my PC, not less.

It's a shame because such a device can be found for tens of dollars at a thrift store these days.

That said, older used dedicated Sony CDP units deliver on all of those things, even cheaper models, as long as there is a digital out. They just don't fit on my desk...
 
Back
Top Bottom