• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Sonnect SoundWire USB-C to XLR Cable Review

Rate this cable adapter:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 51 40.2%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 58 45.7%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 18 14.2%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    127

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
49,202
Likes
291,024
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Sonnect SoundWire USB-C to XLR cable adapter (DAC). It is on kind loan from a member and costs €148.84 or US $165.
Sonnect Soundwire USB C to XLR Balanced Cable DAC Professional review.jpg

This is basically a USB-C powered DAC dongle with XLR output. As a result, it is much lighter and smaller to carry. The braided cabling is difficult to wrap but otherwise, is thin and very light. The XLR connectors look and feel good.

Sonnect SoundWire Measurements
As usual we start with our dashboard:
Sonnect Soundwire USB C to XLR Balanced Cable DAC Professional Measurement.png

Two things are disappointing: high distortion products and low output. The latter is actually a hair better than spec (0 dBu) but still, I like to see 4 volt output. We have little headphone dongles with differential outputs that can do that. Back to distortion, it sets SINAD and compared to stand-alone DACs, performance is wanting:
Best usb c to xlr cable review.png

Best usb c to xlr cable zoomed review.png


Noise performance fortunately, is much better:
Sonnect Soundwire USB C to XLR Balanced Cable DAC Professional DNR Measurement.png


Despite very modest output, distortion rises in IMD tests well below max output (reason will become clear):
Sonnect Soundwire USB C to XLR Balanced Cable DAC Professional IMD Distortion Measurement.png


Multitone shows another clue as to the cause of distortion:
Sonnect Soundwire USB C to XLR Balanced Cable DAC Professional Multitone Measurement.png


Linearity is lost below 17 dB which is fine for this class:
Sonnect Soundwire USB C to XLR Balanced Cable DAC Professional linearity Measurement.png


There is jitter of course but fortunately, it doesn't rise to level of audibility:
Sonnect Soundwire USB C to XLR Balanced Cable DAC Professional Jitter Measurement.png


Filter response is good:
Sonnect Soundwire USB C to XLR Balanced Cable DAC Professional filter Measurement.png


We have a non-documented high pass filtered output:
Sonnect Soundwire USB C to XLR Balanced Cable DAC Professional filter frequency response Measu...png


1 dB attenuation at 20 Hz should not be a bother though.

THD+N vs frequency finally answers the reason for distortion:
Sonnect Soundwire USB C to XLR Balanced Cable DAC Professional THD vs Frequency Measurement.png

That kind of rise in low frequency is indication of a transformer in the output stage. Searching online, there are indeed little transformers embedded in the XLR connectors!

That makes the unit immune to 48 volt phantom power which is important in pro application.

Conclusions
Compared the last USB-C to XLR cable adapter I reviewed, the SoundWire has far cleaner performance. It is on equal footing as far as low output level. On the negative or positive side depending on your point of view, the output transformer loses linearity below 200 Hz and is likely responsible for low output voltage (as to keep its distortion from being worse yet).

Compared to our generic adapter cable, the price is much higher but in the context of professional applications. If you were on strict budget, you could use a headphone dongle with XLR adapter but that would be less robust physically.

I have very limited context here given the two devices of this type I have tested so far. Based on that comparison I can recommend the Sonnect SoundWire.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 
Specs:
Output Channels2 balanced
Output typeTransformer-isolated
XLR connectionGold-plated Neutrik
USB connectionGold-plated Type C
Sampling rate192 kHz
Bit depth32 bit
Dynamic range110 dB (A-Weighted)
THD-103 dB
THD+N-100 dB (@-1 dBFS)
Max output level0 dBu (@0 dBFS)
Cross-talk-110 dB (@1 kHz)
Bandwidth20-22,000 Hz
Output Z150 Ohm
Current draw100 mA
Ports compatibilityUSB-C, Lightning*
OS compatibilityMac, Win, iOS, Android
Overall length2.8 m | 9 ft
Weight140 g
Package180 x 180 x 40 mm 190 g
 
Last edited:
I wonder who might have real demand for such simple, yet "underwhelming" solutions.
 
Typical use case I imagine:
To plug someone's smartphone to the sound reinforcement mixer.
May be usefull for a pro event, as an example.
OK - but then, a BT adapter will do the job, without a cable.
 
I can't see this being very much more lightweight than for example an Apple dongle plus cable. And no cheaper.
 
I can't see this being very much more lightweight than for example an Apple dongle plus cable. And no cheaper.
You'd still need to protect your dongle from accidentally sending 48V phantom power.

Typically, You'd still need something like this after your dongle:

But it's not performing any better, and it's a much more expensive solution, if you add the dongle and the cables.
 
Last edited:
Tear down
See attached files
From what I read in the site "the first DAC-to-XLR interface in cable form". It is more a dac than a cable....
 

Attachments

  • SOUNDWIRE-BDL_SONNECT_HD06.jpg
    SOUNDWIRE-BDL_SONNECT_HD06.jpg
    65.4 KB · Views: 204
  • SOUNDWIRE-BDL_SONNECT_HD05.jpg
    SOUNDWIRE-BDL_SONNECT_HD05.jpg
    71 KB · Views: 209
But why single ended out of DAC. Can the transformer be smaler that way?
 
Thanks for the review.

I don't think pro would use such a cable.
Compared to a more traditional box, it seems at least as good, though.
(https://www.radialeng.com/product/usb-pro)

If Dante is available, you have this: https://www.audinate.com/press/audinate-announces-new-dante-avio-usb-c-adapter-is-now-shipping/
I’m a professional live sound systems engineer/designer/occasional FOH mix engineer.

This is a live sound product. No one would purchase this for domestic/hifi/studio use as there are much more practical solutions for less money.

We use products like this to do easy reference soundchecks with songs from cell phones, and if console network audio/usb interface isn’t available, to run emergency evacuation announcements, intermission playback music, etc. with a product that easily fits into a pants pocket or small pocket in a backpack and doesn’t require any additional cables.

Bleeding edge SINAD is not relevant. Nothing else after the console is going to be significantly better than -85db SINAD especially after factoring ambient noise floor. Modern live sound consoles have tons of clean preamp gain so the output level is a non-issue.

Accidental phantom power protection and bulletproof reliability/dependency, and usb class compliance for plug and play compatibility with every source and every receiver is. We cannot guarantee that every console we work with will have a Dante/waves/usb interface.

there is a reason why this is the industry standard device.

I these days, personally carry a Fosi DS2 with a custom 4.4mm to dual XLR cable with caps to block phantom power. But if someone wants a plug and play solution without worrying about making custom cables, these are great.
 
Last edited:
For that price? You can buy a usb powered DAC and two very decent XLR cables and have 4V out, a SINAD of +100 and tens of $ to spare. It won't be that compact, but by all other standards this is bordering on a scam.
 
I’m a professional live sound systems engineer/designer/occasional FOH mix engineer.

This is a live sound product. No one would purchase this for domestic/hifi/studio use as there are much more practical solutions for less money.

We use products like this to do easy reference soundchecks with songs from cell phones, and if console network audio/usb interface isn’t available, to run emergency evacuation announcements, intermission playback music, etc. with a product that easily fits into a pants pocket or small pocket in a backpack and doesn’t require any additional cables.

Bleeding edge SINAD is not relevant. Nothing else after the console is going to be significantly better than -85db SINAD especially after factoring ambient noise floor. Modern live sound consoles have tons of clean preamp gain so the output level is a non-issue.

Accidental phantom power protection and bulletproof reliability/dependency, and usb class compliance for plug and play compatibility with every source and every receiver is. We cannot guarantee that every console we work with will have a Dante/waves/usb interface.

there is a reason why this is the industry standard device.

I these days, personally carry a Fosi DS2 with a custom 4.4mm to dual XLR cable with caps to block phantom power. But if someone wants a plug and play solution without worrying about making custom cables, these are great.
Are you referring to the DUT or the Radial?
 
A DAC that saturates significantly below 0 dBFS, -12 in this case, is no use, imo. How am I supposed to arrange that the digital signals sent to it are suitably attenuated?

That's probably the very definition of a bad DAC.))

I quote :
"USB-C DAC to dual ISO-XLR™
The SoundWire is the go-to USB-C DAC to dual ISO-XLR™ cable interface, reliably streaming 192 kHz, 32-bit audio from your playback directly to the mixing console, bypassing DI boxes and protecting against 48V."
 
Back
Top Bottom