- Joined
- May 28, 2020
- Messages
- 2,565
- Likes
- 10,652
You will always continue to go around in a circle as to not spoil your subjectivist approach. Sad, but that is your business decisionNot entirely.

You will always continue to go around in a circle as to not spoil your subjectivist approach. Sad, but that is your business decisionNot entirely.

This is what I mean.
How do we define the point at which less capable is actually audibly less capable?
Answers on a postcard..
They are FANTASTIC amps, that is for sure. And there is no harm in getting them, even if you may never need the extra power. On paper (and measurements) they are at the very top.I highly doubt you’d hear a difference in the test described by @Buckeye Amps in post #115. That hasn’t stopped me from getting Purifi 9040 based L/C/R monoblocks though. Why? … psychology!
Pride of ownership.I suppose you define that point on a case-by-case basis through blind testing. True blind testing is often a humbling, “the emperor has no clothes” experience for expensive amps. I am fascinated by situations where objectively better measurements don’t translate to subjectively better in “real world” listening or blind testing.
I highly doubt you’d hear a difference in the test described by @Buckeye Amps in post #115. That hasn’t stopped me from getting Purifi 9040 based L/C/R monoblocks though. Why? … psychology!
Objective measurements performed on one aspect of the entire chain, otherwise in some way, variable factors affecting the control.II am fascinated by situations where objectively better measurements don’t translate to subjectively better in “real world” listening or blind testing.
That is not what is being discussed, the opposite: if two level matched and SOTA amps are not clipping, will one hear a difference.I haven’t followed the discussion closely but surely it’s not controversial to say that two level-matched amps could sound different if one of them is clipping?
Or is that not what’s being discussed?
Got it thanks.That is not what is being discussed, the opposite: if two level matched and SOTA amps are not clipping, will one hear a difference.
Cheerse broThey are FANTASTIC amps, that is for sure. And there is no harm in getting them, even if you may never need the extra power. On paper (and measurements) they are at the very top.
I just won't ever upsell someone on them based on my "subjective" view that they will sound better on the same level playing field as something like the 6525 is all. Others will apparently.
Purifi builds are not cheap, but they mustn't be thousands of $ either. The "cheapest" stereo (1ET6525SA, 2 x 450w) here is 1290 €. I think your AVR is above that, so is mine by list price. And I had way more expensive AVR units.And that's why I love this site and objective,honest audio equipment sellers like Buckeye amps and other members that are onest and for whom making audio amplifiers is a profession!
I'm just a guy who enjoys watching movies and listening to music and honestly I felt bed when I read the review of my Yamaha AVR V6a,but the more I read here and realized that if the amplifier has 16 bit resolution and you listen to CD music or Spotify, there's no point in buying Purify amp that coast thousand of dollars... especially if my speakers are Elac debuts...
It's really not like it's a difference like IPS LCD technology (which drove me crazy because of the washed out blacks) vs. OLED.
Thank you Buckeye amps and other honest people here and if I ever decide by Purify amps when my Yamaha goes dead on me rest assure that will not be from Nord even though I'm from Europe...
I'd buy Nord as I'm in the UK.We have a lunatic system of import duties and red tape.
I've recommended Nord to people many times.
In the end the opinions of the the boss aren't a big deal, it's the product that counts, and that consists of bought-in modules and assembly into a bought-in box.
I'm not going to not buy Shell petrol if their boss claims their fuel is a magic cure for genital warts (I always buy in supermarkets, but sometimes Shell on a road trip is all there is)
Should my Quad Acoustics amplification fail me, your products would be top of the replacement list!My intentions here have been distorted to totally subjective and therefore not 'honest'.
We build a range of amplifiers.
9040 is the best.
When I listen to it, I hear it as the best.
Knowing that it is the end game, fully capable is one thing, reassuring.
But also when you have top tier equipment, I mean properly full range speakers of extreme resolution, turning it up, it will just get louder and remain resolute.
Other lesser amplifiers do not.
I guess in some way it is psychological, but I can't listen without psychology.
My apologies for being human and having an open mind.
![]()
Good luck hearing a difference!Hi everyone,
I sold my Nord Three 1ET7040SA MKII reference monoblocks to a friend who visited to listen to my hi-fi system last weekend. He was so impressed by their performance that he offered to buy them on the spot. As a result, I’ve decided to stay with Nord Acoustics and upgrade to their latest flagship: the Nord Three 1ET9040BA MB MKII monoblocks.
These units utilize the Purifi 1ET9040BA module, offering superior performance over the 1ET7040SA with <0.0001% THD+N, a 137dB SNR, and higher damping factors. Featuring the Nord REV D input buffer and specialized Hypex power supplies, they deliver 375W/8Ω, 750W/4Ω, and 925W/2Ω for significantly increased output headroom. [1]
My objectives for this upgrade, beyond pure curiosity, focus on these measurable technical improvements:
Key Differentiators over the 1ET7040SA MKII:
- Ultra-low distortion and noise floor: <0.0001% THD+N (vs 0.00035% on the 7040SA) and a 137dB SNR (vs 129dB) for enhanced transparency.
- High damping factors: >500 (vs ~400) for superior bass control and authority with demanding speakers.
- Increased dynamic headroom: 375W/8Ω, 750W/4Ω, and 925W/2Ω (compared to 250W/8Ω, 500W/4Ω, and 950W/2Ω).
- Proven Input Stage: The same excellent Nord REV D input buffer (4-position gain 12.8-29dB, Weiss OP2 op-amps, and discrete regulation).
I’m surprised by the relative lack of in-depth reviews for Nord on this forum, given their engineering focus on Purifi modules. While I considered Buckeye and Apollon, I decided to stay with Nord Acoustics after three great years of ownership. I hope these new monos to deliver even greater transparency, significantly improved bass authority, and effortless dynamics without compression—even during the most demanding musical passages (I listen to Acoustic guitars/Pop/Metal/Electronics music)
- Purifi 1ET9040BA module: 40A/90V capability (vs 25-40A) drives all core performance gains.
- Enhanced Power Supply: Specialized higher-capacity Hypex SMPS matched to the 9040BA’s kilowatt demands.
- Premium Build: Refined thermal design and hardware, including Switchcraft RCA/XLR connectors and CHK binding posts.
Delivery is expected within two weeks. I’ll post detailed impressions once the 1ET9040BA MB MKII is properly integrated.
Total price: £3,460 / €3,989 / $4,656
Christian
Congrats on your amp! And a very nice choice too. Always curious to read impressions of upgrades between high end class D amps.
Nice build. Power supply heatsink making contact with the chassis heatsink. Short inner cables for AC, DC, line level and speakers. The premium SE case is just cherry on top.
![]()
![]()
They will!Should my Quad Acoustics amplification fail me,