I'd be impressed if anyone listening to explosions might even think they can tell one amp from another on an A-B test, or that it might matter!![]()
Its all the same unless you exceed capability.It's really hard to hear a difference between Purifi 9040, 7040 and 1ET6525SA amps with level matched listening tests when you don't know which one is playing. With a decent speaker they all sound very similar. Even with giant explosions in movie tracks each sounds amazingly clean. About the only way I can tell a difference is looking at their measurements or visually inspecting the modules. Hearing a consistent difference audibly is tough.
I find a quality input board paired with the Purifi amp like the custom-designed Boxem Stage III which utilizes a composite (OPA1612/OPA1656) design to achieve ultra-low noise and distortion can be just as important as the Purifi module installed.
So if I blind A/B test a 6525 and 9040 on a set of speakers that are not pushing the 6525 past its capabilities, the 9040 should sound better just because it is "more capable"?I call it 'dynamic contrast'.
Limits are not suddenly reached, a more capable amplifier will sound better even at levels a less capable one should be just as good, in theory.
Not here to argue..
Good question.So if I blind A/B test a 6525 and 9040 on a set of speakers that are not pushing the 6525 past its capabilities, the 9040 should sound better just because it is "more capable"?
Is that what you are implying?
I am asking you based on your own statement:Good question.
If you want to dance around an answer because you know it doesn't support your "theory", that is OK too.Limits are not suddenly reached, a more capable amplifier will sound better even at levels a less capable one should be just as good, in theory.
Can't do that for an A-B test, cause it has to be level matched.So if I blind A/B test a 6525 and 9040 on a set of speakers that are not pushing the 6525 past its capabilities, the 9040 should sound better just because it is "more capable"?
Is that what you are implying?
When your theory goes against established science, on a science based forum, the onus is on you to prove it. Until then, of course it will be called out to make sure others reading understand the shortcomings.Does it matter what I think, in theory?
Do you know all the facts?
Why many leave.
Cheers.
The question isn't about comparing the two amps at levels that are demanding to both, the question is about at a level that is not demanding to the lesser powered amp, will there be an audible difference because the more "capable" amp has better dynamics/headroom/etc.Can't do that for an A-B test, cause it has to be level matched.
In this case (assuming that both of the amps have their theoretical thermal management at check all the way to their rated so it can be continuous) one wouldn't know where to start to be fair to both with demanding material (classical with 20dB peaks for example)
It will either be tough for one or have the other one cruising.
Tricky at the end.
Still unfair, as even at lower levels the lesser one can theoretically face some struggle.The question isn't about comparing the two amps at levels that are demanding to both, the question is about at a level that is not demanding to the lesser powered amp, will there be an audible difference because the more "capable" amp has better dynamics/headroom/etc.
So yes, you can level match them and test.
What, perhaps there is something else other what you are capable of measuring that may influence your enjoyment level?When your theory goes against established science, on a science based forum,
Yes, psychologyWhat, perhaps there is something else other what you are capable of measuring that may influence your enjoyment level?
Maybe.
Or something your measurements do not reveal.Yes, psychology
You can keep saying in theory to cover yourself, but it holds no weight until you show a way to back it up with data.Or something your measurements do not reveal.
In theory.
![]()
Still unfair, as even at lower levels the lesser one can theoretically face some struggle.
Imagine a big treated room with 4-5 meters listening distance playing Scheherazade for example, were the trick is not how loud you go on peaks but how loud it needs to be for the silent parts to be audible (assuming a fairly silent room of course)
It's not that simple as you see below, there's a range from 55dB to +100dB to cover:
View attachment 530989
A THD+N vs level COULD be useful for the envelop to play, but still.
What I'm asking.Still unfair, as even at lower levels the lesser one can theoretically face some struggle.
Conditions is the death of blanket statements.What I'm asking.
You have access to the equipment and protocols to carry out honest experimentation, so no reason to be "asking". Test your theoryWhat I'm asking.