I am having this dilemma from some months now, and I never thought ASR could be a place to ask.... but everywhere else I asked, the answers become fast political and are of little help.
Ok, the economic side:
I live in Luxemburg and even though my roof has a pretty good orientation and the government helps with the initial investment, the climate and the incredibly high installation prices vs neighbor countries make that we would need 7-10 years to break even, and at that point we might have to start thinking on replacing the battery (? not sure what is the state of the art). All in all it seems a pretty bad investment on my book.
People tend to counter this saying that the panels allowed them to have the AC running full power all summer, but we are more windows wide open kind of people, I wouldn't want air conditioning even for free.
On the environmental side things get much more complex, and this is the part I struggle more having a meaningful conversation with anyone, as people tend to rely on very simplistic arguments.
Filling the house with hundreds of kg of electronics, batteries and structural elements that for sure carry a heavy footprint to have them working well below their possibilities in central Europe doesn't seem like a no brainier to me unless someone shows me the numbers. And most especially when a good chunk of the electricity we buy today is from renewable sources. I know there are a lot of caveats here,and that my money will also help suppliers to keep advancing the technology, but my point is that I don't have enough information to make an informed decision.
Another argument to postpone the investment is the expectation that the technology evolves further, especially on the battery side. Also reverse charging (or whatever it is called) using a car battery sounds attractive, but is not available where we live at the moment.
Would love to hear your opinions and would love to be proven wrong. Thanks!