• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Snobbery in Hi-Fi. Why are people so stupid and turn their noses up at gear costing much less which is just as good?

But I'm telling you I know individuals who have bought it believing it is superior, and you will not convince them otherwise.
Yes, I agree that is the vast majority of people buying products like Chord DAVE. No-one is disputing that.
 
Calling me a HiFi Snob is simply wrong and I can prove it scientifically by applying mathematics. It shows that my spending on HiFi equipment is insignificant compared to the amount I have spent on premium cars (including Mercedes), premium watches, and premium alcoholic beverages.

No any feelings of guilt here. I have earned my money by legal means and in my opinion I'm entitled to spend it the way I see fit. No any "delusions of grandeur" either. At least I don't believe myself to be such ethically and cognitively superior person that I would be qualified to tell others how they should spend their money.
I am with you. Can't really list all of my spending habits as this is family friendly forum. But would add premium real estate, art, jewelery and good food to the list.

Among other things, I was stupid for most of my life to take as much as I felt was needed for me and my family. While the concept is not wrong, I did not count with inflation getting so high in the last 5 years and threatening to spill into next 5 years. Should have taken more while it was available.
 
Just not many and even fewer might post about it on hi-fi forums.
Yup, that's my supposition as well, although I think those cases are exceptional. They wouldn't go on forums and defend it that way, but audio hobby sites select for those who do (along with the usual hifi publications).
 
I don’t think anyone is defending $30k components (that $ threshold is arbitrary)

This ^^ is where I think folks are taking issue, particularly when it goes well beyond the ridiculously expensive.

Specifically projecting what you determine as the value / cost benefit ratio and anything beyond is snobbery.

e.g:
My son and his classmate were over at our house yesterday working on a school project, building a Roman time siege weapon for their Latin class.

They decided to work in our house because I have almost every tool you can imagine. Because they were teenagers and with no experience working with power tools, I did not feel comfortable with them working with power tools without my supervision, especially with saws, so I was helping them.

I gave them a tour and an brief overview what each tool does:
1777305666384.png


Then I made a half joking and half serious comment: "Boys, when you get older and don't get yourself cheap tools, get yourself some quality tools for real men."
 
Not sure what members on this thread are guilty of exactly. Some of us buy expensive HiFi equipment, because we fancy it and we can. Not sure what guilt anyone of us are feeling; in fact, I think most of us are proud of it.

Here is a picture of my Ascend Acoustics ELX RAAL outfitted with Isoacoustics Gaia II, I am proud that I got it before the price hike.

Here is a picture of my Benchmark AHB2 that drives the Ascend, got it on the use market about two years ago and now the price has increased by $400, pretty glad I got it when I did.

Here is a picture of my Yamaha A-S2200, SINAD most likely measures worse than a Fosi, but why would I want a cheapo Fosi when it's one fart away from flying out the window, when I can have this 50 lbs. beast with the UV meters?

No guilt here, just beaming pride and joy.
Perhaps it's a language thing but "Guilty" has multiple meanings aside from something a judge barks at you on your way to the gallows.

As I've said to you previously, I think you are trying too hard tbh.
 
Wait, what? Since when is relative spending an index of snobbery? Or did I miss the joke?
It was kind of light hearted remark: "HiFi snob" is not right the right label, because if anything, labeling me a "car snob", "watch snob" or "wine/scotch snob" would be much more accurate.

I think that at least in the culture where I live, index of snobbery related to spending habits is relative to what You are spending on. It is way more acceptable to spend a lot (considering Your wealth) on a house, than on a watch (again considering Your wealth). Buying a house that is way more luxurious and bigger than what You need and which You can barely finance, is usually not seen as mark of snobbism , whereas spending 5K€ on watch, even if You can easily afford it, is.
 
As I've said to you previously, I think you are trying too hard tbh.
I don't think I am trying hard enough TBH, certainly nowhere as hard as the OP trying to convince other people to not buy expensive stuff.
 
Then I made a half joking and half serious comment: "Boys, when you get older and don't get yourself cheap tools, get yourself some quality tools for real men."

Bad advice and is actually a good indicator as to where the schism exists in this thread.

You buy a tool to suit the job. Period.

If it's a tool for a one off unicorn project which will only ever get used once and then spend the rest of it's life in the shed, you're an idiot for buying something expensive.

If it's a tool that will spend most of its time out of the shed, working a hard life, you're an idiot for buying cheap.

It's an important point.
If you always go for premier products regardless then you'll likely not buy the best tool for the job because you'll find a way to make do for the one-off.

If you always go cheap regardless then you'll be constantly at the tool store for replacements.

You are applying a black and white filter to what is a grey and fuzzy problem.
 
Which the OP isn't doing at all.
I think we have enough consensus that he is.

Bad advice and is actually a good indicator as to where the schism exists in this thread.

You buy a tool to suit the job. Period.

If it's a tool for a one off unicorn project which will only ever get used once and then spend the rest of it's life in the shed, you're an idiot for buying something expensive.

If it's a tool that will spend most of its time out of the shed, working a hard life, you're an idiot for buying cheap.

It's an important point.
If you always go for premier products regardless then you'll likely not buy the best tool for the job because you'll find a way to make do for the one-off.

If you always go cheap regardless then you'll be constantly at the tool store for replacements.

You are applying a black and white filter to what is a grey and fuzzy problem.
You are reasonable for saying this, I don't think the OP will agree with you.

But you are misinterpreting.
 
You are reasonable for saying this, I don't think the OP will agree with you.

But you are misinterpreting.
Why wouldn’t I agree with that. That post makes a valid point about something and its application. There's nothing not to agree with.
 
Why wouldn’t I agree with that. That post makes a valid point about something and its application. There's nothing not to agree with.
So you no longer upset at tool snobs now. . .good start. Just need to work on watches, cars and HiFi equipment (the ones we know about here).
 
You're correct. The OP isn't trying to convince folks not to buy "premium" hi-fi equipment
He's saying they're stupid if they do
There's nothing wrong with premium gear, premium gear can be defined by something that is well constructed, fit for purpose, will probably last as long as any other well-designed gear and measures well. We can add all sorts of variables to that and get the same product but increase the value by x10 or x100 or more. This is where it becomes mindless spending. We are going beyond ‘good hi-fi’ into bias influenced or subjective spending, it’s not better ‘hi-fi’, yet there are swarms of people who swear it is, and even turn their noses up at the lower end ‘premium’ stuff because they don’t think it’s in the same league. It is just as good though.
 
There's nothing wrong with premium gear, premium gear can be defined by something that is well constructed, fit for purpose, will probably last as long as any other well-designed gear and measures well. We can add all sorts of variables to that and get the same product but increase the value by x10 or x100 or more. This is where it becomes mindless spending. We are going beyond ‘good hi-fi’ into bias influenced or subjective spending, it’s not better ‘hi-fi’, yet there are swarms of people who swear it is, and even turn their noses up at the lower end ‘premium’ stuff because they don’t think it’s in the same league. It is just as good though.
So if I buy something that is 10x or 100x more than a "just as good" cheap stuff but I don't turn my nose up at the cheap stuff, is that OK with you?
 
"Premium" refers to anything that's more expensive than the OP deems necessary.
Next, will you ask me to define "necessary"?

That's a bit of an odd, meaningless, and wrong response tbh.

"I don't know" would have been a better one.
 
You are so off the mark, I really need to meet you.
I am also very intrigued by your outlook in life. You are free to private message me if you like, I would take the opportunity to learn more about you and why you feel other people shouldn't spend their money as they like.
 
Back
Top Bottom