• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Snake Oil Department, Top This


Here's the manufacturer's website.

If that speaker meets the specs they give it will sell like wildfire at any price to the fullrange driver crowd. I guess we wait for independent measurements. It's quite a claim.

I'm sure the driver has been misidentified here, though. I think we can move on for now.
 

Here's the manufacturer's website.

If that speaker meets the specs they give it will sell like wildfire at any price to the fullrange driver crowd. I guess we wait for independent measurements. It's quite a claim.

I'm sure the driver has been misidentified here, though. I think we can move on for now.
It is not a claim, but a guess.
The drivers in the other speakers are also very easy to identify, in my opinion. From the front, the drivers look absolutely identical, but have a different basket and magnet, so it's just a coincidence.
But as I said, maybe it's all just a big coincidence, like the DIY construction proposal from 2016 with the Monacor SPX-200 WP, which deviates by a full 0.1 liters in volume, i.e. significantly less than 1%.
We'll probably never know the truth...
 
It is not a claim, but a guess.
The drivers in the other speakers are also very easy to identify, in my opinion. From the front, the drivers look absolutely identical, but have a different basket and magnet, so it's just a coincidence.
But as I said, maybe it's all just a big coincidence, like the DIY construction proposal from 2016 with the Monacor SPX-200 WP, which deviates by a full 0.1 liters in volume, i.e. significantly less than 1%.
We'll probably never know the truth...
To clarify, the claim I am referring to there is that in their specification, not the driver identification.
 
https://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/shunyata-research-sigma-nr-v2-power-cord

A $3500 power cord.
"This power cord brings an accuracy of timbre and harmony, a musical veracity, that I’ve simply not experienced before. Yes, it’s got all the audiophile virtues I’ve described in my previous experiences with Shunyata power cables. But those attributes really don’t speak to what the Sigma NR v2 is about. "

What drugs was he on? Can I have some?
Talking about cable nonsense, I spotted this on Ebay today, as part of a description for a pair of used horn speakers:

2010:
Pair of 5 metre Pure Silver Speaker Cable Looms, custom made for these speakers (Cost £5200!)


I had almost identical speakers and found that my (much less costly) solid silver cables somewhat unsatisfactory, so I moved to Duelund tinned copper ones at a fraction the price!
 
Now, look at this https://www.ecoustics.com/products/...Yvdn9zObq0AH6CMs98_aem__VNOnE6ohIiAHO0vBmP94g

And this PA waterproof speaker from Monacor
View attachment 383761

All reviews I was able to find did not mention that these 30.000EUR/pair "handcrafted with love" speakers from Milan use the 60EUR Monacor driver. I conjecture that in the review contract with the magazines, the reviewers would only get the speakers if they committed not to mention what components were used. In fact, the italian Audioreview magazine asked for a review pair but they were denied: not surprising, since they also measure everything and they have been the first ones, decades ago, to report on transient and step response and 3-frequency IMD plots. Being (mostly) objective they would object (sic) to such a restriction.

Since I am italian and live close to italy in the european union, where italian courts have jurisdiction, I STRONGLY DENY (fingers crossed) that this is bordering on fraud, lest they sue me.
Slam dunk of snake oil with this sentence:

 
To be fair - practically all speaker manufacturers are claiming burn in time.
I could see where in a new speaker, suspension components may become a bit more flexible with early use, and sound quality might change as a result of that. That sort of change should occur over a very short time interval, though. It's possible that the sonic changes might be too small to notice, too.
 
To be fair - practically all speaker manufacturers are claiming burn in time.
The burn-in time would have to be over 2 weeks so that the speaker cannot be returned in the EU...

....But they are clever enough to only build the speaker individually to order, which is why there is no return option. However, it is forbidden to circumvent the Consumer Protection Act in this way.
 
I could see where in a new speaker, suspension components may become a bit more flexible with early use, and sound quality might change as a result of that. That sort of change should occur over a very short time interval, though. It's possible that the sonic changes might be too small to notice, too.
The drivers are designed such that the suspension components don't get more flexible over time. I think it's our brains that are slowly adapting to the sound. But still this makes more sense than speaker cable run in periods I see in some ads.
 
I could see where in a new speaker, suspension components may become a bit more flexible with early use, and sound quality might change as a result of that. That sort of change should occur over a very short time interval, though. It's possible that the sonic changes might be too small to notice, too.
Oh I agree. I know from personal experience that ear/hearing adaptation as a result of listening for changes is *way* more significant than any (inaudible) change to the speakers.
 
Oh I agree. I know from personal experience that ear/hearing adaptation as a result of listening for changes is *way* more significant than any (inaudible) change to the speakers.
I know what you mean. I'm sure my wife's voice has not changed over the years but she claims I hear less and less of what she's saying.
 
Similar, but not the same. Visually, the magnet is deeper and not as wide. The frame is also different.
View attachment 383768View attachment 383771

The size of the magnet is about twice that of the treble horn in both cases, and the relative size of the treble horn with respect to the cone is the same. The angle of the perspective is different, in one case it is wider, probably because of a closer shot. This, and the fact that the glossy surround increase the diameter, makes the magnet look smaller in comparison. In the case of the modified driver, the main symmetry axis of the driver makes a smaller angle with the camera's plane, hence the apparent bigger depth. Also, the frame has been clearly edited in post processing, to hide the "pro" shape of the folded metal. Or maybe they put some putty on it.

To me it is clearly the same driver.
 
Last edited:

Here's the manufacturer's website.

If that speaker meets the specs they give it will sell like wildfire at any price to the fullrange driver crowd. I guess we wait for independent measurements. It's quite a claim.

I'm sure the driver has been misidentified here, though. I think we can move on for now.

I am quite sure the driver has not been misidentified. Read my reply to @ta240: https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...ke-oil-department-top-this.19045/post-2043746
 
Slam dunk of snake oil with this sentence:


"We may have created the best full-range speaker of all time, aimed at competent audiophiles who appreciate beauty. The F85 is truly Made in Italy, offering maximum expression of naturalness of sound, without electro-acoustic obstacles, with a direct path from amplifier to driver. All characteristics that we like to describe as a simple passion for perfect sound and true Italian class.”

Oh, my!
 
the italian Audioreview magazine asked for a review pair but they were denied: not surprising, since they also measure everything and they have been the first ones, decades ago, to report on transient and step response and 3-frequency IMD plots.
Interesting! Could you link such an article? Or it is only print? I looked at their website some but did not find anything measured. Grazie!
 
To be fair - practically all speaker manufacturers are claiming burn in time.

Mechanical "burn in" is an obvious matter, but it takes little time. 150 hours is exaggerated, but audiophiles are attracted to stuff that requires A LOT of burn-in time. If you claim 300 hours, then you must of course price the speaker even higher.
 
Back
Top Bottom