Doesn't Sony use some kind of flat speaker tech? I've wondered whether there's a future for that NXT technology with flat screen sets (Sony may be using something similar), especially the biggest screens where the panels could be long and thin down the edges of the screen.I think that with the TVs being so flat & thin, it would be difficult to get anything worthy of being called a speaker in there. Best to just go with a separate sound setup.
Yup. It works but it sounds eh.Doesn't Sony use some kind of flat speaker tech?
Can you please define “eh”. Objectively, of course.Yup. It works but it sounds eh.
Canadian. Everything comes out with a Canadian accent.Can you please define “eh”. Objectively, of course.
Not really. I've only heard it a few times, briefly and mostly by accident. No bass, lacked clarity or presence.Can you please define “eh”. Objectively, of course.
FYI & FWIW, I am enjoying the easy profundity of this observation @Kal RubinsonMadness lies in that direction because not all "dull" recordings are dull in the same way nor are all "bright" recordings bright in the same way. OTOH, all "accurate" recordings are, by definition, accurate in the same way.
The electrons will stay warm and comfortable too.Cottons electrical properties have been known for about 80 years. Cotton wires allow the electrons to flow and while flowing cleans up any bad electrons. Everyone knows cotton is a good cleaning cloth. So, get your cotton wires and see how it changes the sound. You will be amazed at how big of a difference it makes. You will have to turn up the volume though as a side effect of the cotton cleaning the electrons is it tends to ever so slightly slow them down.
Yup. It works but it sounds eh.
I believe that eh is like meh but less consonant -- i.e., more vowelistic, I suppose.Can you please define “eh”. Objectively, of course.
"Eh" is more casual and dismissive.I believe that eh is like meh but less consonant -- i.e., more vowelistic, I suppose.
![]()
Is it anything like "meh"?Not really. I've only heard it a few times, briefly and mostly by accident. No bass, lacked clarity or presence.
I think meh has more bass involved, eh seems to offer airy highs. Just a subjective opinion of course.I believe that eh is like meh but less consonant -- i.e., more vowelistic, I suppose.
![]()
You mean like the Marlboro Man had to be a smoker and died from cancer?Is there any way these companies could be forced to prove their claims in double-blind tests?
No Sir!...I believe that eh is like meh but less consonant -- ...
I heard it used with a exclamation mark but this requires the skill and deft ability of a master linguist."eh" is a Canuck word which always precedes a question mark and is not a relative of "meh"!
Dear god, no.I think the discriminators between meh and eh probably rate a separate thread*.![]()
Check mate inDear god, no.
Apparently.Check mate in49moves? is that even possible?
I am pretty sure Mr. (or is he Dr.) Rubinson was using it in a more Yankee-esque context, as he indicated.You mean like the Marlboro Man had to be a smoker and died from cancer?
NOTE: I am just joking, as I was with the cotton knots! Cigarettes lack any audio SnakeOil properties but I am sure someone may try to prove me wrong!
No Sir!
"eh" is a Canuck word which always precedes a question mark and is not a relative of "meh"!