• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

SMSL SU-8 Version 2 Balanced DAC

rajapruk

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
472
Likes
489
Beta-testing done now then by Amir. Tested OK.
 
Last edited:

wyrainer

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2018
Messages
57
Likes
140
V2TOV1.jpg
 
Last edited:

wyrainer

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2018
Messages
57
Likes
140
No problem!
I bought a su-8 at 11.11, the price is about $158 (1099 rmb). I didn't know if they had corrected this problem, so after two days I returned it back...

then I bought a topping d10 and a khadas tone board
now I little regret, I like balance out
 

SMSL-Mandy

Senior Member
Audio Company
Joined
Aug 31, 2018
Messages
304
Likes
688
Something we have changed.

In order to prevent my translation errors, I will keep the Chinese that the engineer told here.Thanks.

输出端这三个开关的供电,由原来的5V提高在9V供电而已,其它在无更改。我们再说明一下,他之前测试时是因为他们测试方式都是以0dB频率信号进行测试的,之上一版本机器就后面开关供电的电压幅度不够所以看起来参数会差一点,但上版本的机器以-6dB频率信号进行测试,参数也会是很好的,当时设计人员认为用户正常使用播放歌曲信号,是不会有0dB频率信号那么高的幅值的,而且这个机器是有前级功能。

还有就是一个多余的时钟没用,删了,加了一个备用的保险丝。这些都不会影响参数的。
su8.jpg



The power supply of these three switches at the output is increased by the original 5V to 9V, nothing other have changed.

Because all tested with a 0dB frequency signal. In the previous version of the machine, the voltage of the power supply behind the switch is not enough, so it seems that the parameters will be a little worse. But if tested with a -6dB frequency signal, and the parameters would be very good,too. When we designed SU-8, the designer thought that the normal user would not have the same high amplitude as the 0dB frequency signal, and the machine is pre-AMP.

An extra clock is useless, deleted, and a spare fuse is added.These do not affect the parameters.
 
Last edited:

wyrainer

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2018
Messages
57
Likes
140
Something we have changed.

输出端这三个开关的供电,由原来的5V提高在9V供电而已,其它在无更改。我们再说明一下,他之前测试时是因为他们测试方式都是以0dB频率信号进行测试的,之上一版本机器就后面开关供电的电压幅度不够所以看起来参数会差一点,但上版本的机器以-6dB频率信号进行测试,参数也会是很好的,当时设计人员认为用户正常使用播放歌曲信号,是不会有0dB频率信号那么高的幅值的,而且这个机器是有前级功能。

还有就是一个多余的时钟没用,删了,加了一个备用的保险丝。这些都不会影响参数的。View attachment 18159

The power supply of these three switches at the output is increased by the original 5V to 9V, nothing other have changed.

Because all tested with a 0dB frequency signal. In the previous version of the machine, the voltage of the power supply behind the switch is not enough, so it seems that the parameters will be a little worse. But if tested with a -6dB frequency signal, and the parameters would be very good,too. When we designed SU-8, the designer thought that the normal user would not have the same high amplitude as the 0dB frequency signal, and the machine have pre-level functions.

An extra clock is useless, deleted, and a spare fuse is added.These do not affect the parameters.

难得能看到中文啊。。。。。
我这半吊子英文,看还勉强,发帖实在是发的痛苦啊。
 

rajapruk

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
472
Likes
489
Why is not OPPO UDP-205 at the top of the SINAD topchart anymore with its 115dB SINAD? Because it is not for sale any more?
 

BigDaddyLongnut

New Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2018
Messages
1
Likes
0
Something we have changed.

In order to prevent my translation errors, I will keep the Chinese that the engineer told here.Thanks.

输出端这三个开关的供电,由原来的5V提高在9V供电而已,其它在无更改。我们再说明一下,他之前测试时是因为他们测试方式都是以0dB频率信号进行测试的,之上一版本机器就后面开关供电的电压幅度不够所以看起来参数会差一点,但上版本的机器以-6dB频率信号进行测试,参数也会是很好的,当时设计人员认为用户正常使用播放歌曲信号,是不会有0dB频率信号那么高的幅值的,而且这个机器是有前级功能。

还有就是一个多余的时钟没用,删了,加了一个备用的保险丝。这些都不会影响参数的。View attachment 18159


The power supply of these three switches at the output is increased by the original 5V to 9V, nothing other have changed.

Because all tested with a 0dB frequency signal. In the previous version of the machine, the voltage of the power supply behind the switch is not enough, so it seems that the parameters will be a little worse. But if tested with a -6dB frequency signal, and the parameters would be very good,too. When we designed SU-8, the designer thought that the normal user would not have the same high amplitude as the 0dB frequency signal, and the machine have pre-level functions.

An extra clock is useless, deleted, and a spare fuse is added.These do not affect the parameters.
I have board version 1.1, I see v.1.0 and v.1.2 mentioned here, were any improvements made from 1.0 to 1.1?
 

SchwarzeWolke

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Messages
94
Likes
82
Did you not buy the GALA dac? Cold feet on that one?

I guess you can ask Amazon support what to do.
The price with 189€ was just too good and I realized that I always could resell it for this price. :)
Funding for the GALA is also not going well...
Edit: Given the really easy nature of disassembly/reassembly, the most efficient and environmental friendly way would be to send out new boards. As far as I can see, you don't have to solder anything. Just unscrew a little bit and exchange the board.
 

Javster

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2018
Messages
5
Likes
1
So how would you say overall this compares to the topping dx7s? Is it better or worse?
 

Jimster480

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Messages
2,895
Likes
2,054
Location
Tampa Bay
SU-8 comes with a remote.
Oh you are right, it could be used as a preamp then with powered speakers.
I just looked and amir noted this in his original review.
I guess then its just the difference of the bigger LCD screen + the amp + Coax output (on the DX7).
 
Top Bottom