• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

SMSL Sanskrit 10th MK II vs Topping E30: Features

MondoAudio said:
Interesting. These measurements of the E30 from the Canadian Amazon site:
Color:Black/Silver
Size:10x12.5x32cm
Weight:265g
But I see on the Aliexpress site that it's definitely a compact little feller. Thanks.
Click to expand...

;-)
smsl_10th_scale - Copy2 - Copy.png

The banana is 7,5x4,5x14,4cm.
 
MondoAudio said:
In the last week, it's great to see @amirm post reviews of two budget DACs that perform in the top tier. What's cool is that, unlike the Katana and the Khadas Tone Board, they are standalone DACs with enclosures and even remotes! They have a tightwad audio listener like me reaching for my wallet. But before I do, I have questions that I hope @amirm (who might be the only person in the world to use them both) will be able to answer...
  • I use quite a bit of vintage gear with optical outs. The Sanskrit 10th MK II performance isn't as good with optical, being better with USB. How about the E30? Any degradation from optical relative to USB?
  • How do the remotes compare? Any one work better or have better features?
  • I know nothing about filters, but I'm willing to listen. Any differences?
From an audible audio perspective, it looks like they're a wash. So I'm looking for differences in features. Any other meaningful differences?
Thanks!
Click to expand...

Filter settings. Whether or not they make any difference whatsoever you be the judge.
smsl_10th_filters.png
 
The filters on the E30 are even in the same order so the chart definitely applies (#3 is default).
 
Hi all, this is my first post so my apologies if I'm asking in the wrong thread.

I'm also considering either the e30 or SMSL 10th MKII. My main consideration is the way that the digital volume is handled as I'll be connecting either one of them directly to a rega maia power amp. SMSL states that there would be no changes to the signal so it looks like they've addressed bit clipping. Just wondering if the same can be said for e30... Cant find much info on whether the pre amp is actually well considered or just there as an extra feature. I'd like to see these budget dacs incorporate an analogue volume control to negate bit clipping issue. Thanks
 
Just got my Sanskrit a few days ago... Great dac, clear, dead silent, without any noticeable color. Reminds me of apogee duet - except duet is a bit on the lean side sound wise. Looks much better in real life then I expected. Remote control is garbage though - only works when you are straight in front of the dac and pointing the remote straight at it - any angle and it does not work... but that's a minor gripe considering the performance.
 
Hey guys, I'm a little late to the party on this thread. I've never owned a standalone DAC, but I'm thinking about getting one to upgrade the output of a Logitech Squeezebox Touch. The Touch has USB, Coax, and Toslink outputs available. I mainly stream redbook quality FLAC files to it from a home server, with the occasional Hi Rez file and some Spotify or Tidal streaming every now and then.

These 2 DACs appear to offer the best bang for the buck and seem like a good way to dip my toe in. I have Emotiva electronics (USP1->XPA2) driving Vandersteen 3a Signature speakers. Do any of you have an opinion about adding either the MKII or e30 to my system? Would either make a difference or am I just wasting my time and should I jump higher up the food chain immediately?
 
AlexFNYC said:
Just got my Sanskrit a few days ago... Great dac, clear, dead silent, without any noticeable color. Reminds me of apogee duet - except duet is a bit on the lean side sound wise. Looks much better in real life then I expected. Remote control is garbage though - only works when you are straight in front of the dac and pointing the remote straight at it - any angle and it does not work... but that's a minor gripe considering the performance.
Click to expand...

Anyone know if the remotes are any better on topping gear ?
 
rtraut said:
Hey guys, I'm a little late to the party on this thread. I've never owned a standalone DAC, but I'm thinking about getting one to upgrade the output of a Logitech Squeezebox Touch. The Touch has USB, Coax, and Toslink outputs available. I mainly stream redbook quality FLAC files to it from a home server, with the occasional Hi Rez file and some Spotify or Tidal streaming every now and then.

These 2 DACs appear to offer the best bang for the buck and seem like a good way to dip my toe in. I have Emotiva electronics (USP1->XPA2) driving Vandersteen 3a Signature speakers. Do any of you have an opinion about adding either the MKII or e30 to my system? Would either make a difference or am I just wasting my time and should I jump higher up the food chain immediately?
Click to expand...
Whatever’s the cheaper option for you. Both awesome devices :)
 
Phew! Great info. Been running FL1 and getting frustrated by edginess in the music. FL3, smoothed everything out. That seems to work nicely with KEF LS50W’s.
 
Last edited:
After reading both reviews from amir and Wolfx700 i really can't deside between Topping E30 and Smsl Sanskrith. Coax is much better in the Topping E30, but i will never use it.

Why measure Amir and Wolfx700 so diffrent in the Multi Tone Test?
 
Saeniv said:
After reading both reviews from amir and Wolfx700 i really can't deside between Topping E30 and Smsl Sanskrith. Coax is much better in the Topping E30, but i will never use it.

Why measure Amir and Wolfx700 so diffrent in the Multi Tone Test?
Click to expand...

The great thing about these lower priced DACs is, you don’t have to agonize so much over your choice. If they cost megabucks, you’d have cause for concern. At these prices you could buy one of each and sell what you don’t like.
 
Now MKII driver V4.67 from SMSL but E30 driver V4.86 from Topping.
 
Milesian said:
The great thing about these lower priced DACs is, you don’t have to agonize so much over your choice. If they cost megabucks, you’d have cause for concern. At these prices you could buy one of each and sell what you don’t like.
Click to expand...

That is true, but for a student, 130€ + shipping is still a lot of money.

And i also like to hear a scientific explanation. I mean that is what the website is about. Two people measure the same thing and get results so diffrent from eachother why? How could this be?

If one person is getting results, a sceond one has to proof it, if nobody verifys it, then it is not scientific proofed.
 
Saeniv said:
That is true, but for a student, 130€ + shipping is still a lot of money.

And i also like to hear a scientific explanation. I mean that is what the website is about. Two people measure the same thing and get results so diffrent from eachother why? How could this be?

If one person is getting results, a sceond one has to proof it, if nobody verifys it, then it is not scientific proofed.
Click to expand...
What's the difference you are referring to? You meant the Sanskrit mkii? I have used Amir's multitone file before, Amir's multitone file seems to be very hot but no real clipping. DACs may get internal clipping or perform worse in Amir's test. But it's still legit. If you compare to a different dac in Amir's measurements, you can still get the idea.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Topping E30 II Lite alternatives
Replies
8
Views
1K
JorgeO
J
T
Topping E30 II Lite issues
Replies
1
Views
3K
staticV3
staticV3
R
Topping E30 vs Musical Fidelity V90
Replies
1
Views
417
staticV3
staticV3
A
SPDIF input: Topping E30 II, E30 II Lite, FiiO K7, or something else?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Sstorm
S
J
Wiim Pro Plus vs Wiim Mini + Topping e30 ii
Replies
10
Views
2K
jpcesar
J
Back
Top Bottom