Raw has more inputs so it wins (plus HQ headphone amp), otherwise they should sound completely identical.Given that no human being can hear the difference: which is better, this DAC or the D-6s?
View attachment 387767View attachment 387768
No, you choose which output is active. If headphones are on the others turn quietDo the outputs mute when plugging headphones in?
The RAW is much better in terms of price/performance, its a great dac and also a great headphone amp.Given that no human being can hear the difference: which is better, this DAC or the D-6s?
View attachment 387767View attachment 387768
So maybe only test some of the others only if the default is wrong or broken?I have gotten tired of running filter and filter response tests for all the settings as the results are always the same. So I am showing the default
NoDo the outputs mute when plugging headphones in?
usb c can déliver 100 W since thunderbolt 3 ( 10 year) , chip usb4 or thunder its 2/3 dollarsWhile USB C is capable of 9V 2A (18W), most USB devices are backwards compatible to USB A, 5V 1A (5W).
Amirm measured 1.365W/ch at 33 ohms, 2.7W + processor load = ~3.5W.
To make this device universal, they included a GOOD power supply,
That doesn't even have any magnetic influence!
(-150dB @ 60Hz, Hol E Shite!)
In this lil box.
Remarkable.
This Lil Box is made for perfect headphones, amplified . . . Perfectly!
usb c can déliver 100 W since thunderbolt 3 ( 10 year) , chip usb4 or thunder its 2/3 dollars
A DAC/AMP with physical tone controls or 7/10 band graphic EQ sliders would be perfect. It doesn't bother me much since I EQ at the source, but it would be VERY handy, indeed.Was thinking hard about this one to save some desktop space vs the current E50/THX-789 combo but realized I could use external physical tone controls if the DAC and amp are integrated... first-world problems.
So, what is the most mathematically accurate filter? One that completely prevents aliasing. I have the Do400.The filter tested is not the linear phase filter but the minimum phase filter which is the default on the ES9039Q2M which is identified by the stop band level and ripple. SMSL have been mislabeling the filters on their ES9039 DACs for a while now with the D-6S, DL200, DO100 Pro, SU-X, DO400, D400ES as well as the VMV D1se as I have shown in this thread I created on 26 June.
In particular on 29 June, I already pointed out that this is also the case for the RAW-MDA1 in this post in the above mentioned thread. The image quality is poor due to being from pre-release manual. However, it is identical in the manual available on the SMSL website. Note the date and time.
View attachment 387452
This is the menu screen for the filters from a YouTube video. Clearly, selecting the linear fast roll off filter enables the minimum phase filter.
View attachment 387453
At this point, almost two months later, I was hoping SMSL has managed to fix it but alas not. @SMSL-Mandy what in the world is making this take so long?
FL3's stop band begins at fs/2 at the cost of rolling off early at 18.5 kHz for 44.1 kHz sample rate. FL4 has extension to 20.5 kHz for 44.1 kHz sample rate but its stop band only begins at 0.55 fs.So, what is the most mathematically accurate filter? One that completely prevents aliasing. I have the Do400.
Pretty sure all of them adjusted at the same time.Sorry if I missed this along the way in this thread... but does the volume knob also adjust the output level of the XLR and RCA jacks on the rear panel or only the front panel headphone output level? I could not find this info on the product page at Shenzhenaudio.