PL150 looks nicer
Yeah, that's a lot nicer. It's pretty cheap too, at least in Aus.PL150 looks nicer
Last edited:
PL150 looks nicer
Yeah, that's a lot nicer. It's pretty cheap too, at least in Aus.PL150 looks nicer
Yeah that's why I'm curious if the front is somehow removable so it car be diy-fixed, because it really do look like crap.I was interested in this one, but the design of the thing really put me off. If SMSL had just made it a silver face plate it, I think it would've been a no brainer. Looks like a cheapo product from 2005 as is. Hard to argue with the value of the thing, I suppose.
It can’t, no.This seems good for what it is in the current era. I wonder if it can be used as a PC disc drive via USB? That would be handy!
I’ll test one of these some day.
Again, thanks for the feedback, I planned it to be 3 short books. Maybe the president managed to somehow survive, and will be back in the final bookThat crossed through my mind as I felt sorry for him, looking for his daughter.
![]()
The PL150 looks much betterI was interested in this one, but the design of the thing really put me off. If SMSL had just made it a silver face plate it, I think it would've been a no brainer. Looks like a cheapo product from 2005 as is. Hard to argue with the value of the thing, I suppose.
Yep. Some people hate it. I actually like it. By comparison the black PL150 looks kinda anonymous, like the cheap Sony Blu-ray I replaced. The 150 also misses out on the milled aluminium of the PL100 which happens to match my other components.it really do look like crap
I don't need my CD player to stand out in any way whatsoever, and if it should stand out I don't want it to have any cheap graphics from the early 2000s. But yeah each to their own of course, would be nice to be able to pick from two coloured options just like the PL150.Yep. Some people hate it. I actually like it. By comparison the PL150 looks kinda anonymous, like the cheap Sony Blu-ray I replaced. The 150 also misses out on the milled aluminium of the PL100 which happens to match my other components.
Anyhoo, in Australia the 150 costs 50% more than the 100. Perhaps that’s how they set the price. Lol. Both are good value but the 100 is a very easy buy.
There's quite a few of us. (I also like to browse a physical library to select something to play, I don't like selecting from a screen).I suppose it's an item worth testing though for people that want to play their music directly from CD's each time.
Yeah, fair enough. Ha, £2K for a CD Player - that is insane!There's quite a few of us. (I also like to browse a physical library to select something to play, I don't like selecting from a screen).
I don't really think these SMSL players are expensive CD players - I paid £2K for mine but it's not slot loading and doesn't have those nasty circles on the front...
I'm getting back into playing CDs for similar reasons. I realised I wasn't actively listening to my music as much, and I missed the ritual of handling phsyical media and not having so much choice. I'll keep my streaming subscriptions, but on a Friday night while sipping on some fine booze, it's nice to put a CD on.That’s a really nice review, and it’s good to see that manufacturers haven’t completely given up on CD players. I recently picked up the SMSL PL200 top-loading model mainly for nostalgia (I used to own an old Sony CDP-338 ESD which started to show serious signs of aging). Objectively, my old DVD-ROM drive feeding the Eversolo DMP-A8 sounds just as transparent, but I still enjoy the ritual of putting on a disc and listening with full attention
It is a bit, but it's my only source, it gets used every day, and I wanted one that looks good (to me) and feels good to use.Yeah, fair enough. Ha, £2K for a CD Player - that is insane!
Yeah it's true, they're impractical and relatively expensive (for an antiquated function). But that's part of the point, at least for me.I suppose these CD players can feel quite cool & retro, but they're not very practical and are expensive for what they do given you can spend £10-20 on a USB DVD drive and use it to rip all your CD's to a PC or something similar - then you get perfect playback every time once you've ripped them. I suppose it's an item worth testing though for people that want to play their music directly from CD's each time.
It is a bit, but it's my only source, it gets used every day, and I wanted one that looks good (to me) and feels good to use.
Yes, I suppose it's part of the ritual and the approach to choosing your music you'll listen to for that day & you put in that CD then you listen to the whole albumn more likely rather than flitting around in playlists. I can understand that, albeit I'm a bit more on the fence re a £2K purchase for a CD Player, ha, albeit of course you can do same thing with ripped CD's re not flitting around & instead listening to whole albumn, but I get the ritual & tactile side of having the physical medium and perhaps getting up & looking through your shelf of CD's, so it's a way of doing it.Yeah it's true, they're impractical and relatively expensive (for an antiquated function). But that's part of the point, at least for me.
Actually it's just a transport...I can understand that, albeit I'm a bit more on the fence re a £2K purchase for a CD Player
Ha, makes sense!Actually it's just a transport...
I hear you and you're right, it was an indulgence. I was working long hours and had plenty of money and no time to spend it, so it was a reward of sorts.
It doesn't sound any different to the much cheaper one it replaced, nor did I expect it to.