• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

SMSL AO200 THD+N compared to other "lower power" class D amplifiers

RandomEar

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Feb 14, 2022
Messages
591
Likes
1,406
I just happended to stumble upon THD+N data @ 4 Ω for the AO200, published by Aoshida. SMSL isn't even displaying this data themselves on their AO200 page. They only show results for 8 Ω. Obviously, I can't check whether the data is correct and actually belongs to the AO200. But I thought I'd put together a quick graph, comparing the performance to other amps of somewhat similar power. The results look plausible to me.


DISCLAIMER: The data shown below is shamelessly stolen from different sources (including ASR reviews, if available) using Web Plot Digitizer. As the measurements were performed by different operators sometimes also using different or unknown analyzers, they may not be 100% comparable. All data shown is for the worst channel of a stereo setup, in case both were given in the source.

THD+N Comparison.png


From the graphs, it looks like SMSL managed to push the noise down by one order of magnitude on the AO200 when compared to the DA-9. Power is very similar on these two amps. The Topping PA5 and Hypex NC122MP-based amps perform better concerning THD+N and power - at slightly higher price points. Some AO200 THD+N numbers (for 1 kHz, 4 Ω):
  • Min(THD+N) = 0.0026% @ 47.3 W
    (This is the global minimum and also the point, where distortion takes over. From my understanding, this is what @amirm would quote as power.)
  • 63.9 W @ THD+N = 0.1%
  • 75.4 W @ THD+N = 1%
  • 98.4 W @ THD+N = 10%
    (I guess this is what SMSL refers to when advertising the amp as "90 W". Let's call it "creative marketing".)
 
I just got reminded of the Topping MX5, which uses the same Infineon MA12070 chip as the AO200 and should perform similar. After grabbing the data, this is how it compares:
THD+N Comparison_MX5.png

And indeed, it is pretty close in performance. Lower distortion and slightly lower noise floor than the AO200, but also less power (about 41 W at the bend, 53 W @ 0.1% THD+N and 61 W @ 1% THD+N).
 
Intitially forgot to add the sources. Here they are:

I also just received a unit of the AO200 and sadly, it seems to be defective :( There's a high-pitched sizzling/crackling noise coming from the amp itself, when not muted. And it generates a similar sound from the speakers. Too bad - already the second SMSL product I received that has issues right out of the box.
 
Thank you for posting these charts - I have the AO200 and am driving a pair of Whafedale Lintons (90 dB) with it (also use a separate subwoofer via sub out) and it performs remarkably well. It fills a medium sized room to uncomfortable levels at about 12 o’clock on my preamp.

The current Topping LA90 review and thread makes me wonder how the AO200 compares - slightly worse SINAD, about the same power, but more features (Bluetooth, tone controls, sub out, USB in, display, in-built power supply) and the AO200 is much less expensive albeit chip amp versus AB. Too bad SMSL has not sent Amir one of these to test.
 
Thank you for the graphs. The SMSL AO200 is definitely a great unit. It drives my speakers with ease. I believe it is better than the AO200-MKII because the MKII uses a different chip (the Infineon MA5332MS) which I believe is not load independent so the frequency response will vary depending on the impedance of the speaker. The first edition of the AO200 uses the Infineon MA12070 which is not load dependent. I'm very happy with this unit. However - there is very tough competition from the Topping MX3s. It is cheaper, uses the same chip (MA12070), and if you look at the graphs (ones from SMSL and ones from Topping) the power output is very similar before clipping. The MX3s also has a good headphone amp and dac built in and definitely better bluetooth. There is no balanced input though.
 
Thank you for the graphs. The SMSL AO200 is definitely a great unit. It drives my speakers with ease. I believe it is better than the AO200-MKII because the MKII uses a different chip (the Infineon MA5332MS) which I believe is not load independent so the frequency response will vary depending on the impedance of the speaker. The first edition of the AO200 uses the Infineon MA12070 which is not load dependent. I'm very happy with this unit. However - there is very tough competition from the Topping MX3s. It is cheaper, uses the same chip (MA12070), and if you look at the graphs (ones from SMSL and ones from Topping) the power output is very similar before clipping. The MX3s also has a good headphone amp and dac built in and definitely better bluetooth. There is no balanced input though.
Why do you believe the MA5332MS chip is load dependent?
 
Back
Top Bottom