This is a review and detailed measurements of the SMSL A50Pro stereo amplifier. It is on kind loan from a member and sells for US $96.00.
There is a white LED which shows the current volume level which I appreciate. The volume control is "overloaded" with menu and input selections but you can kind of figure it out. Back panel shows impressively level of functionality including a dedicated amplifier for the subwoofer!
You even get a remote control. The whole bit makes me think this is a platform made for soundbars given the HDMI and Toslink inputs. Let's hope it performs better than that.
SMSL A50 Pro Amp Measurements
As usual, I set the gain to 25 dB and tested with analog input:
Wow, this is exceptionally bad performance. We have distortion products that are nearly -60 dB and very high noise level resulting in very poor combo as represented in SINAD.
Fortunately things improve somewhat if you use digital input such as Toslink optical:
While general noise level and distortion peaks are reduced, we have a ton of interference. This level of performance lands the A50Pro in the "need work" category:
As noted, noise performance is poor:
Fortunately frequency response is not load dependent but is severely cut off, indicating input digitization at low sample rate:
I was hoping that feeding it digital input would allow wider bandwidth but it does not:
If anything, you will lose a bit of bandwidth into the audio band.
Power into 4 ohm is very limited:
I didn't see the point to continue as there are many better choices of amplification in this class but perhaps not with this level of connectivity.
Conclusions
Seems my guess was right that this is hardware platform designed for sound bar use with its HDMI and subwoofer analog output and such. In that class, measured performance is not critical but cost very much is. I get that this is a very competitively priced device but it needs to achieve a minimum standard of performance to fit in our vocabulary.
Needless to say, I can't recommend the SMSL A50 Pro. A cleaned up version of this functionality would be a nice thing to have, but not this.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
There is a white LED which shows the current volume level which I appreciate. The volume control is "overloaded" with menu and input selections but you can kind of figure it out. Back panel shows impressively level of functionality including a dedicated amplifier for the subwoofer!
You even get a remote control. The whole bit makes me think this is a platform made for soundbars given the HDMI and Toslink inputs. Let's hope it performs better than that.
SMSL A50 Pro Amp Measurements
As usual, I set the gain to 25 dB and tested with analog input:
Wow, this is exceptionally bad performance. We have distortion products that are nearly -60 dB and very high noise level resulting in very poor combo as represented in SINAD.
Fortunately things improve somewhat if you use digital input such as Toslink optical:
While general noise level and distortion peaks are reduced, we have a ton of interference. This level of performance lands the A50Pro in the "need work" category:
As noted, noise performance is poor:
Fortunately frequency response is not load dependent but is severely cut off, indicating input digitization at low sample rate:
I was hoping that feeding it digital input would allow wider bandwidth but it does not:
If anything, you will lose a bit of bandwidth into the audio band.
Power into 4 ohm is very limited:
I didn't see the point to continue as there are many better choices of amplification in this class but perhaps not with this level of connectivity.
Conclusions
Seems my guess was right that this is hardware platform designed for sound bar use with its HDMI and subwoofer analog output and such. In that class, measured performance is not critical but cost very much is. I get that this is a very competitively priced device but it needs to achieve a minimum standard of performance to fit in our vocabulary.
Needless to say, I can't recommend the SMSL A50 Pro. A cleaned up version of this functionality would be a nice thing to have, but not this.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
