somebodyelse
Master Contributor
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2018
- Messages
- 6,384
- Likes
- 6,244
It's a commonly described way to do a quick and dirty check for bad RF emissions, especially if you know what frequency range is likely to be a problem.You do that often?
It's a commonly described way to do a quick and dirty check for bad RF emissions, especially if you know what frequency range is likely to be a problem.You do that often?
Someone will eat me alive for this,but I think is the car audio variation (which is not a bad thing considering the conditions in a car)Infineon is what Genelec uses if I remember correctly. But different chips.
This is simple:It would be interesting to test an amplifier with a slightly "stronger" Merus MA5332 chip.
And I don't disagree with you. I'm with you on this.SMSL A100 is sold as a completed product, thus the customer is not supposed to insert inductors or anything into speaker wires. It must work “as is”. The complex load impedance of the speaker is also not pre-defined, parameters are specified to 4 and 8 ohm. I do not understand why some try to protect manufacturers, customers are to be protected.
Which also lacks an LC output filter, if I remember the internal pics correctly. There was also a complaint about interference with powerline ethernet in that thread.The Loxjie A30 is a good MA12070 based amplifier and a better alternative.
You must have issues with your test setup. I am always listening to music while testing including when I reviewed the SMSL A100. Had no interference issues whatsoever. I have had DACs be subject to interference but never had them stop working.However, this brings troubles in the field of electromagnetic interference. My wifi staying near was almost paralysed. The DAC feeding the amp with test signals was unable to work without using USB-ISO isolator. For the 5 minute rated power test I had to use analog generator, as the DAC was freezing at amplifier high power due to emitted interference.
Ah, if only it was "My WIFE" now THAT might be a feature worth a lot of money!troubles in the field of electromagnetic interference. My wifi staying near was almost paralysed.
Such issues, plus questionable reliability, serviceability and support make me stay away from such "SINAD wonders" and rather buy devices with lower SINAD (which is still inaudible to me during normal music listening) from decades old and renown large manufacturers.Well, that settles it then. Makes me wonder how many other budget amps have the same issue. There must be people out there spending hours troubleshooting their Wi-Fi and swapping out gear unnecessarily.
It is only a case of filter-less class D, ICs like TPA3110 or MA12070. The cheapest junk amplifiers.Well, that settles it then. Makes me wonder how many other budget amps have the same issue. There must be people out there spending hours troubleshooting their Wi-Fi and swapping out gear unnecessarily.
Various inexpensive MA12070 amplifiers (boards) for €/$ 25-50 have filters with coils as standard.It is only a case of filter-less class D, ICs like TPA3110 or MA12070. The cheapest junk amplifiers.
Probably -you definitely know way more about this than I do. My point was just that, outside of this very specific niche group we’re in right now, no one would ever notice what would be wrong when their Wi-Fi starts acting up.It is only a case of filter-less class D, ICs like TPA3110 or MA12070. The cheapest junk amplifiers.
This one and other similar cheap amps based on TPA3110 (TI) series and MA12070 (Infeon) do nothing right. They are mediocre in all audio parameters. They are just cheap, so you can (or better say could before the start of customs wars) buy them at less than $20 - like this one:Some budget gear clearly comes with its risks, no matter how well it performs otherwise.
www.audiosciencereview.com