• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required as is 20 years of participation in forums (not all true). There are daily reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Simulation Overview of the 'Double Bass Array' Configuration.

Flaesh

Active Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2021
Messages
192
Likes
119
Location
Eburg
1666316440554.png
 
OP
R

René - Acculution.com

Active Member
Technical Expert
Joined
May 1, 2021
Messages
219
Likes
729
I am not trying to argue that this response shape can be predicted from the radiation of a piston in an infinite baffle into half-space. My question was about the nature of the stimulus used in the simulation itself.

So why should I care about "radiation of a piston in an infinite baffle into half-space" then? Because that's how the on-axis pressure at a point at distance d from the piston is calculated using the Thiele/Small theory. For an ideal sealed or infinite-baffle subwoofer with zero voice-coil inductance, in the T/S theory the passband is the frequency region for which the acceleration amplitude is constant with frequency.

For such a sub, with an applied voltage having a constant amplitude vs. frequency:
  • The displacement amplitude vs. frequency has a low-pass characteristic
  • The velocity amplitude vs. frequency has a bandpass characteristic
  • The acceleration amplitude vs. frequency has a high-pass characteristic (same as the pressure response of the sub itself)
This nature then becomes relevant when such a sub is placed in multiples in a DBA. One might rightly wonder how the subs' response according to the T/S theory is modified by the DBA. I would argue that, to determine such an effect, such a simulation would best be done with a stimulus having a constant acceleration amplitude with frequency.
I believe I used constant acceleration without any filter on it. You then need to look up the pressure in a tube with one end having acceleration and the other end perfect absorption.
 

tmuikku

Member
Joined
May 27, 2022
Messages
73
Likes
72
You could argue that they should be placed halfway up now, but I am going with this setup, since you probably have to place them near the floor in most situations anyway. In general, as you stray more and more away from the ‘walls moving’ situation, the response curves will naturally take a hit.
Cool sims, thanks!

What do you think how far one push it to still be useful arrangement? I mean, if the idea and implementation was simplified to just two subs and vertical dimension would it still work?:D one sub below the main listening position seat and one above would make easiest / cheapest / smallest practical implementation only if it worked. If it works, then shape of the room would not matter that much.
 

sam_adams

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 24, 2019
Messages
527
Likes
1,201
Is this the reason of different delays?))
View attachment 238577

:
View attachment 238580

I agree; this will help to adjust the subs in reality

Notice that you have the rear subs pointed toward the wall. Right-clicking on them rotates the driver. Clicking on the individual sub to highlight it will allow you move the sub with the arrow keys for more accurate positioning. The spinbox for the delays only accepts whole numbers, so distance only moves in roughly one foot increments, therefore, 'inch' or sub-millisecond precision is not possible.
 

Flaesh

Active Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2021
Messages
192
Likes
119
Location
Eburg
you have the rear subs pointed toward the wall.
I had rear subs pointed toward the wall in my second DBA with IB front subs)).
In real processors\software delay and gain increments is small enough; for roomsim modeling you may adjust size and absorption respectively
 
OP
R

René - Acculution.com

Active Member
Technical Expert
Joined
May 1, 2021
Messages
219
Likes
729
Cool sims, thanks!

What do you think how far one push it to still be useful arrangement? I mean, if the idea and implementation was simplified to just two subs and vertical dimension would it still work?:D one sub below the main listening position seat and one above would make easiest / cheapest / smallest practical implementation only if it worked. If it works, then shape of the room would not matter that much.
It all depends. But perhaps it is the best way if two subs are to be used.
 

Serkan

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Messages
63
Likes
32
I have created a digital filter acting like a virtual bass array in REW. I never had a double bass array system so I cannot compare with the real thing but the digital version works nicely. Here's a link to the tutorial video if anyone is interested:

 

ppataki

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
725
Likes
756
Location
Budapest
I have created a digital filter acting like a virtual bass array in REW. I never had a double bass array system so I cannot compare with the real thing but the digital version works nicely. Here's a link to the tutorial video if anyone is interested:


This is pretty cool @Serkan, thank you for sharing, much appreciated!

I don't want to play the devil's advocate here but just one point that came to my mind: one of the advantages of a real-life DBA is to get rid of the freq. dips too (DBA would create a wave plain that should fill the dips pretty much everywhere in the room)
With this digital solution I don't see that really happening
It indeed cut the peaks and somewhat filled the dips too but what is the added value vs doing the same with traditional EQ filters?
Thank you
 

Serkan

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Messages
63
Likes
32
This is pretty cool @Serkan, thank you for sharing, much appreciated!

I don't want to play the devil's advocate here but just one point that came to my mind: one of the advantages of a real-life DBA is to get rid of the freq. dips too (DBA would create a wave plain that should fill the dips pretty much everywhere in the room)
With this digital solution I don't see that really happening
It indeed cut the peaks and somewhat filled the dips too but what is the added value vs doing the same with traditional EQ filters?
Thank you
Your welcome! You're absolutely right that this is not a true replacement for a physical double bass array but more like a quick and easy to implement digital prefilter before you start correcting your speaker response.

Edited: As per the added value compared to EQ filters, I guess you can expect less overall deterioration in clarity as the counter signal is based on a Dirac delta which will not lower the impulse magnitude of the final response as an IIR filter does.
 
Last edited:

ppataki

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
725
Likes
756
Location
Budapest
Your welcome! You're absolutely right that this is not a true replacement for a physical double bass array but more like a quick and easy to implement digital prefilter before you start correcting your speaker response.

Edited: As per the added value compared to EQ filters, I guess you can expect less overall deterioration in clarity as the counter signal is based on a Dirac delta which will not lower the impulse magnitude of the final response as an IIR filter does.
Sounds good, next week I will have time to try it
Will report back with my measurements

Can you please elaborate what you mean by lowering the impulse magnitude
Thank you
 

Serkan

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Messages
63
Likes
32
Sounds good, next week I will have time to try it
Will report back with my measurements

Can you please elaborate what you mean by lowering the impulse magnitude
Thank you
You can see the difference better in step response (un-normalized) comparison which is sort of integral of the impulse response:

1671285241742.png

red is 100Hz xo VBA filter, blue is 20-100Hz 6 band REW auto min phase EQ


sorry for off topic!
 

Serkan

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Messages
63
Likes
32
Virtual Pseudo DBA and w\o virtual rears:
View attachment 250592
and normal DBA:
View attachment 250593
See also Nils Öllerer, 2015 Varianten des Double Bass Arrays p.15 http://hannover-hardcore.de/infinity_classics/!!!/

I made a huge mistake by posting under this topic. I didn't use to consider a double bass array in my system but these graphs are obliterating my digital correction works in every way and it seems I will have to cough up some cash for new subs soon :facepalm:
 

ppataki

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
725
Likes
756
Location
Budapest
I made a huge mistake by posting under this topic. I didn't use to consider a double bass array in my system but these graphs are obliterating my digital correction works in every way and it seems I will have to cough up some cash for new subs soon :facepalm:

Beware @Serkan that DBA will work only in a regular-shaped room with at least 4 subs - if you have an irregular shaped room most likely it won't work
I tried it in my irregular shaped room and unfortunately it did not work........ :(
 

Flaesh

Active Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2021
Messages
192
Likes
119
Location
Eburg
I made a huge mistake by posting under this topic
I think not! VPDBA (sometimes and somwhere wrong called SBA) deserves fair criticism and exposure))
To be honest ever arbitrary placed VPDBA (APVPDBA :)) "kills" first lenght mode:
1671286764726.png

to cough up some cash for new subs soon
More or less suitable room is desirable for simple 2channel DBA, while some unperfections may be compensated by EQing subs individually.
Can you show your room drawing?
 

Serkan

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Messages
63
Likes
32
Beware @Serkan that DBA will work only in a regular-shaped room with at least 4 subs - if you have an irregular shaped room most likely it won't work
I tried it in my irregular shaped room and unfortunately it did not work........ :(
My room has a descent rectangular shape (5.35m x 3.75m x 2.65m) but there's a door opening in the middle of the rear wall and there's no door. So there's a door sized hole at the back. Would that be a problem?
 
Top Bottom