The whole ethernet system uses caches so it doesn't matter.Thanks, but I guess what I’m asking is if the streamer caches music into its memerory, does a switch have any impact at all? In this case, it’s not pure streaming right?
So all the comments , excluding the bench test by Amir , are based on belief ( In the absence of proof)
For anyone with a understanding of digital fundamentals it is a pretty easy decision to label this switch as snake-oil. It's just that simple.OK I've read this thread in its entirety and it seems nobody has actually listened to one of these audiophile switches in their system.
So all the comments , excluding the bench test by Amir , are based on belief ( In the absence of proof)
I live in Thailand and the Etherstream Fidelizer is produced here, a similar audiophile switch to the SAB.
So ,I am going to take advantage of the 30 day trial on offer and audition this switch in my system -modest as it is.
I'll let you know how it goes .
Is there a switch that improves image quality? Data is data, once it is perfectly preserved, there isnt nothing more a switch can doOK I've read this thread in its entirety and it seems nobody has actually listened to one of these audiophile switches in their system.
So all the comments , excluding the bench test by Amir , are based on belief ( In the absence of proof)
I live in Thailand and the Etherstream Fidelizer is produced here, a similar audiophile switch to the SAB.
So ,I am going to take advantage of the 30 day trial on offer and audition this switch in my system -modest as it is.
I'll let you know how it goes .
OK I've read this thread in its entirety and it seems nobody has actually listened to one of these audiophile switches in their system.
So all the comments , excluding the bench test by Amir , are based on belief ( In the absence of proof)
I live in Thailand and the Etherstream Fidelizer is produced here, a similar audiophile switch to the SAB.
So ,I am going to take advantage of the 30 day trial on offer and audition this switch in my system -modest as it is.
I'll let you know how it goes .
Was about to reply the same.For anyone with a understanding of digital fundamentals it is a pretty easy decision to label this switch as snake-oil. It's just that simple.![]()
What? Listening tests were part of the review:OK I've read this thread in its entirety and it seems nobody has actually listened to one of these audiophile switches in their system.
Listening Tests
I queued up my reference playlist in Roon and streamed them to Ethernet i. Baseline was with the Bonn N8 in the loop. I switched to just the Netgear and it sounded better! More detail. More air. Just higher fidelity. I then reversed the AB sequence, starting with the Netgear and going to Bonn N8. Same difference! More air, more analog like, etc.
What is going on? Simple: you frame of mind makes a huge difference in what you perceive. When performing comparisons, your brain gets into instrumentation mode and analyzes music differently than when you lean back and just enjoy music. In doing so, it hears more detail, air, etc. It does so even when nothing is changed in the waveform. In other words, the Ethernet switch is not changing sound. It is you that is changing.
This is why we test people blind. When your brain doesn't know what is being tested, then its variations factor out (statistically speaking).
No, the bottom line is that you don't know how to do a proper listening tests so that your brain doesn't confuse you. You wasted your money on something that can't improve sound as a matter of engineering, measurements and proper listening tests.Bottom Line - The Etherstream is a keeper for sure.
Oh, now you are getting cute as well? Who do you live with, aliens? One more outburst like this and you will be gone.You sound like you have issues -Do you still live with your mother?
You sound like you have issues -Do you still live with your mother?
Delicately putting this a simple as possible... It is impossible for the picture quality and sound quality to change in any way shape or form. It just is. The hardware either works or it doesn't in this application and it does not change the sharpness or the outlines and the crispness etc etc. If the unit is working then you get a picture and sound and if there is a issue then you will not get a picture and sound. It is a either or situation and not a slight improvement situation. You have been duped into buying something that is snake-oil. If you have a double blind test you will see that there is no difference or you can just trust us and believe us.OK here is my review of the Etherstream Fidelizer network switch.
Here is my system
Router/LPS >audiophile Supra Cat8 >Etherstream/LPS >supra Cat8 >USB 3 port dedicated barebones windows 10 laptop> AudiophileOptimizer>Fidelizer Pro>Process Lasso>ROON Tidal/Qobuz >Supra audiophile USB out > M500 DAC> Balanced XLR out>Elac ARB 51 active speakers. All power via AQ Niagra 1200
Before the audio summary lets comment on the Tv via supra Cat 8 > Nvidia Shield> Display
Immediate obvious colour saturation and overall picture quality -noticeably the outline of images.
Also perceived a lack of buffering on IPTV
A good start.
The Audio.
I choose not to use exaggerated adjectives in this summary , as I find them annoying when used by reviewers.
So in brief when compared to other tweaks or additional changes I have used in the past
AQ Cables - No audio gain
AQ Niagra 1200 power conditioner -No audio gain
Supra Cat8 ethernet cable -No audio Gain
Supra USB cable - SQ gain over standard USB cable
AO - SQ Gain
Fidelizer Pro - Significant SQ gain
Process Lasso - No SQ gain
Audiophile fuses - No SQ gain
Contact Oil - No SQ gain
ROON 1.8 - No SQ gain
Eherstream Fidelizer network Switch - Significant SQ gain
More authority , better instrument separation, increased depth- The SQ change is not subtle
Currently burning in around the clock -apparently SQ increase after 100-200 hours
Caveats
Maybe the improvement in SQ would have been achieved with a standard network switch without the modifications given by Fidelizer or maybe it wouldn't .
Also I live in a condo in Thailand and access to the internet is via copper cable only , no optical fibre cable here , so open to a significant amount of EMI and RFI in the power and internet delivery and of course whatever interference that my supply is subject to within the condo itself.
Bottom Line - The Etherstream is a keeper for sure.
Uh huh.OK here is my review of the Etherstream Fidelizer network switch.
Here is my system
Router/LPS >audiophile Supra Cat8 >Etherstream/LPS >supra Cat8 >USB 3 port dedicated barebones windows 10 laptop> AudiophileOptimizer>Fidelizer Pro>Process Lasso>ROON Tidal/Qobuz >Supra audiophile USB out > M500 DAC> Balanced XLR out>Elac ARB 51 active speakers. All power via AQ Niagra 1200
Before the audio summary lets comment on the Tv via supra Cat 8 > Nvidia Shield> Display
Immediate obvious colour saturation and overall picture quality -noticeably the outline of images.
Also perceived a lack of buffering on IPTV
A good start.
The Audio.
I choose not to use exaggerated adjectives in this summary , as I find them annoying when used by reviewers.
So in brief when compared to other tweaks or additional changes I have used in the past
AQ Cables - No audio gain
AQ Niagra 1200 power conditioner -No audio gain
Supra Cat8 ethernet cable -No audio Gain
Supra USB cable - SQ gain over standard USB cable
AO - SQ Gain
Fidelizer Pro - Significant SQ gain
Process Lasso - No SQ gain
Audiophile fuses - No SQ gain
Contact Oil - No SQ gain
ROON 1.8 - No SQ gain
Eherstream Fidelizer network Switch - Significant SQ gain
More authority , better instrument separation, increased depth- The SQ change is not subtle
Currently burning in around the clock -apparently SQ increase after 100-200 hours
Caveats
Maybe the improvement in SQ would have been achieved with a standard network switch without the modifications given by Fidelizer or maybe it wouldn't .
Also I live in a condo in Thailand and access to the internet is via copper cable only , no optical fibre cable here , so open to a significant amount of EMI and RFI in the power and internet delivery and of course whatever interference that my supply is subject to within the condo itself.
Bottom Line - The Etherstream is a keeper for sure.
(Being as generous as I can here.)OK here is my review of the Etherstream Fidelizer network switch.
Here is my system
Router/LPS >audiophile Supra Cat8 >Etherstream/LPS >supra Cat8 >USB 3 port dedicated barebones windows 10 laptop> AudiophileOptimizer>Fidelizer Pro>Process Lasso>ROON Tidal/Qobuz >Supra audiophile USB out > M500 DAC> Balanced XLR out>Elac ARB 51 active speakers. All power via AQ Niagra 1200
Before the audio summary lets comment on the Tv via supra Cat 8 > Nvidia Shield> Display
Immediate obvious colour saturation and overall picture quality -noticeably the outline of images.
Also perceived a lack of buffering on IPTV
A good start.
The Audio.
I choose not to use exaggerated adjectives in this summary , as I find them annoying when used by reviewers.
So in brief when compared to other tweaks or additional changes I have used in the past
AQ Cables - No audio gain
AQ Niagra 1200 power conditioner -No audio gain
Supra Cat8 ethernet cable -No audio Gain
Supra USB cable - SQ gain over standard USB cable
AO - SQ Gain
Fidelizer Pro - Significant SQ gain
Process Lasso - No SQ gain
Audiophile fuses - No SQ gain
Contact Oil - No SQ gain
ROON 1.8 - No SQ gain
Eherstream Fidelizer network Switch - Significant SQ gain
More authority , better instrument separation, increased depth- The SQ change is not subtle
Currently burning in around the clock -apparently SQ increase after 100-200 hours
Caveats
Maybe the improvement in SQ would have been achieved with a standard network switch without the modifications given by Fidelizer or maybe it wouldn't .
Also I live in a condo in Thailand and access to the internet is via copper cable only , no optical fibre cable here , so open to a significant amount of EMI and RFI in the power and internet delivery and of course whatever interference that my supply is subject to within the condo itself.
Bottom Line - The Etherstream is a keeper for sure.
Immediate obvious colour saturation and overall picture quality -noticeably the outline of images.